Analysis of naming game over networks in the presence of memory loss

In this paper, we study the dynamics of naming game where individuals are under the influence of memory loss. An extended naming game incorporating memory loss is proposed. Different from the existing naming game models, the individual in the proposed model would forget some words with a probability in his memory during interaction and keep his conveyed word unchanged until he reaches a local agreement. We analyze the dynamics of the proposed model through extensive and comprehensive simulations, where four typical networks with different configuration are employed. The influence of memory loss as well as the population size on the performance of the proposed model is investigated. The simulation results show that (i) the stronger memory loss, the larger convergence time; (ii) as the strength of memory loss becomes stronger, maximum number of total words will decrease, while the maximum number of different words among the population remains almost unchanged; (iii) the maximum number of different words increases linearly with the increase of the population size and coincides with each other under different strength of memory loss. The findings in the proposed model may give an insight to understand better the influence of memory loss on the transient dynamics of language evolution and opinion formation over networks.

[1]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  Role of feedback and broadcasting in the naming game. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Naming Games in Two-Dimensional and Small-World-Connected Random Geometric Networks , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Propensity and Stickiness in the Naming Game - Tipping Fractions of Minorities , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Analysis of the “naming game” with learning errors in communications , 2015, Scientific reports.

[5]  Adam Lipowski,et al.  Phase transition and fast agreement in the Naming Game with preference for multi-word agents , 2013, 1308.3781.

[6]  Ying-Cheng Lai,et al.  Optimal convergence in naming game with geography-based negotiation on small-world networks , 2011 .

[7]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Journal of Statistical Mechanics: An IOP and SISSA journal Theory and Experiment Sharp transition towardsshared vocabularies in multi-agent systems , 2006 .

[8]  Yilun Shang,et al.  Deffuant model of opinion formation in one-dimensional multiplex networks , 2015 .

[9]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Non-equilibrium phase transition in negotiation dynamics , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Yuan Gao,et al.  Naming Game on Networks: Let Everyone be Both Speaker and Hearer , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[11]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[12]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Nonequilibrium dynamics of language games on complex networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Serge Galam,et al.  Modeling the Forming of Public Opinion: An approach from Sociophysics , 2013 .

[14]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence: A Survey , 2007, 0707.1762.

[15]  Xue Lin,et al.  Finite-Time Consensus of Switched Multiagent Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[16]  Tommy W. S. Chow,et al.  Naming Game with Multiple Hearers , 2013, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[17]  Animesh Mukherjee,et al.  Opinion formation in time-varying social networks: The case of Naming Game , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  The Naming Game in Social Networks : Community Formation and Consensus Engineering , 2009 .

[19]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[20]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[21]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[22]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.