The role of learner and input variables in learning inflectional morphology

To examine effects of input and learner characteristics on morphology acquisition, 60 adult English speakers learned to inflect masculine and feminine Russian nouns in nominative, dative, and genitive cases. By varying training vocabulary size (i.e., type variability), holding constant the number of learning trials, we tested whether learners required a “critical mass” of vocabulary to generalize case marking patterns to new nouns. Cattell's Culture-Fair IQ Test mediated the effect of type variability on success in generalizing case marking to new vocabulary: only participants with above-median Culture-Fair Test scores showed the predicted critical mass effect of better generalization with larger training vocabulary. These results demonstrate how individual differences in central executive functioning and attention allocation capacity can affect adult second language learning.

[1]  Vera Kempe,et al.  The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Russian gender : Can elements of child-directed speech aid in learning morphology? , 2001 .

[2]  Individual differences in working memory: introduction to the special section. , 2001 .

[3]  A. Miyake,et al.  Individual differences in working memory: introduction to the special section. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980 .

[5]  E. Bates,et al.  Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[6]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging , 1992 .

[8]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[9]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition. , 1997 .

[10]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Genetic evidence for bidirectional effects of early lexical and grammatical development. , 2003, Child development.

[12]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  MORPHOLOGY AND LONGER DISTANCE DEPENDENCIES , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[13]  Linda Price,et al.  Individual Differences in Learning: Cognitive control, cognitive style, and learning style , 2004 .

[14]  G. Hitch,et al.  Phonological short-term memory and new word learning in children. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[15]  J. Norris,et al.  Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta‐analysis , 2000 .

[16]  R. Gómez.  Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[17]  Ping Li,et al.  The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[19]  P. Robinson.  Attention, Memory, and the “Noticing” Hypothesis , 1995 .

[20]  N. Ellis,et al.  Implicit and explicit learning of languages , 1997 .

[21]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  J. Duncan,et al.  Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[24]  S. Hale,et al.  Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[25]  A. Miyake,et al.  The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  S. Gathercole,et al.  Limitations in working memory: implications for language development. , 2000, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[27]  Nick C. Ellis.  Language Learning. A Journal of Research in Language Studies , 1948 .

[28]  What Does Daneman and Carpenter's Reading Span Really Measure? , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[29]  R. Cattell,et al.  Abilities : Their Structure , Growth , and Action , 2015 .

[30]  James E. McDermott,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. , 1999 .

[31]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[32]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  A Theory‐Based Approach to the Measurement of Foreign Language Learning Ability: The Canal‐F Theory and Test , 2000 .

[33]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[34]  Patricia J. Brooks,et al.  Exploring language acquisition in children with a miniature artificial language: Effects of item and pattern frequency, arbitrary subclasses, and correction☆ , 1990 .

[35]  Jean Christophe Verstraeh.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .

[36]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[37]  Fred Genesee,et al.  Individual differences in second language learning , 1978, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[38]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[39]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The phonological loop as a language learning device. , 1998, Psychological review.

[40]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Transfer and competition in second language learning , 1992 .

[41]  Roman Taraban,et al.  Drawing learners’ attention to syntactic context aids gender-like category induction , 2004 .

[42]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[43]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[44]  Patrick Juola,et al.  A connectionist model of english past tense and plural morphology , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  R. Schmidt.  The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[46]  David J. Therriault,et al.  A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence , 2002 .

[47]  E. Newport,et al.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  S. Hale,et al.  Processing Speed, Working Memory, and Fluid Intelligence: Evidence for a Developmental Cascade , 1996 .

[49]  R. Gómez,et al.  Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  A. Miyake,et al.  Individual Differences in Second-Language Proficiency , 2006, Psychological science.

[51]  Patricia J. Brooks,et al.  Acquisition of Gender-like Noun Subclasses in an Artificial Language: The Contribution of Phonological Markers to Learning , 1993 .

[52]  Paul J. Angelis.  SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY, FOREIGN LANGUAGE APTITUDE, AND INTELLIGENCE: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ANALYSES. Miyuki Sasaki. New York: Peter Lang, 1996. Pp. xii + 155. $40.95 cloth. , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.