Living in an age of online incivility: examining the conditional indirect effects of online discussion on political flaming

Communication scholars have examined the potential pitfalls and rewards associated with the ability to communicate in online spaces. We continue in that line of research by proposing a mediated moderated communication process model focused on what conditions lead people to engage in aggressive online communication behaviors, otherwise known as flaming. Specifically, we argue that online political discussion socializes individuals to see flaming as an acceptable behavior. This increase in perceived acceptability in turn increases intention to flame. Results demonstrate that this increase in intention to flame is greater among those with high levels of verbal aggression. To test our model, we conducted two surveys that asked students and blog users questions about their online media behaviors. Results replicate across both surveys.

[1]  J. Geer,et al.  Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate , 2007 .

[2]  E. Lambeth With Malice toward All? the Media and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions , 2000 .

[3]  B. Krahé,et al.  Exposure to violent video games and aggression in German adolescents: a longitudinal analysis. , 2009, Aggressive behavior.

[4]  Charles R. Berger,et al.  The handbook of communication science , 1987 .

[5]  Jennifer A. H. Becker,et al.  Reported Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggressiveness Levels: The Influence of Type of Argument , 2007 .

[6]  Tim Phillips,et al.  Everyday Incivility: Towards a Benchmark , 2003 .

[7]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation , 2009 .

[8]  Diana C. Mutz Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[9]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  Effects of violent movies and trait hostility on hostile feelings and aggressive thoughts , 1997 .

[10]  R. L. Holbert,et al.  Intramedia Mediation: The Cumulative and Complementary Effects of News Media Use , 2005 .

[11]  Lorenzo Mosca,et al.  The political use of the internet: Some insights from two surveys of Italian students , 2007 .

[12]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Andrew Howes,et al.  HARMONY AND TENSION ON SOCIAL NETWORK SITES , 2012 .

[14]  A. Buss,et al.  The aggression questionnaire. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  L. R. Huesmann,et al.  Human aggression: A social-cognitive view , 2003 .

[16]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Flaming in electronic communication , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Flaming among first-time group support system users , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Verbal aggression during disengagement of dating relationships , 1998 .

[19]  Vincent Cicchirillo,et al.  How could you think that?!?!: Understanding intentions to engage in political flaming , 2015, New Media Soc..

[20]  Jens Woelke,et al.  Personal Influence. The Part Played by the People in the Flow of Mass Communication , 2016 .

[21]  Dustin B. Wygant,et al.  The Role of Peer Attachment and Normative Beliefs about Aggression on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying. , 2013 .

[22]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct , 1990 .

[23]  L. R. Huesmann,et al.  Children's normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  J. M. Kayany Contexts of uninhibited online behavior: flaming in social newsgroups on Usenet , 1998 .

[25]  Philip A. Thompsen,et al.  Effects of Pictographs and Quoting on Flaming in Electronic Mail. , 1996 .

[26]  J. C. Wilson,et al.  Are Graphic Media Violence, Aggression and Moral Disengagement Related? , 2008 .

[27]  Karen E. Dill,et al.  The interactive relations between trait hostility, pain, and aggressive thoughts , 1998 .

[28]  Diana C. Mutz Effects of “In-Your-Face” Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition , 2007, American Political Science Review.

[29]  Shiv R. Upadhyay Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses , 2010 .

[30]  John A. Daly,et al.  Personality and interpersonal communication , 1987 .

[31]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  The Influence of Descriptive and Injunctive Peer Norms on Adolescents' Risky Sexual Online Behavior , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[32]  Eric M. Uslaner,et al.  The decline of comity in Congress , 1993 .

[33]  Thomas E. Mann,et al.  It's Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism , 2012 .

[34]  Jonathan S. Morris,et al.  High-Conflict Television News and Public Opinion , 2006 .

[35]  Juan Herrero,et al.  Acceptability of domestic violence against women in the European Union: a multilevel analysis , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[36]  Diana C. Mutz Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[37]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[38]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  The transsituational influence of social norms. , 1993 .

[39]  C. Anderson,et al.  The Effects of Reward and Punishment in Violent Video Games on Aggressive Affect, Cognition, and Behavior , 2005, Psychological science.

[40]  M. Stock,et al.  Adolescent alcohol-related risk cognitions: the roles of social norms and social networking sites. , 2011, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[41]  M. Lindsay,et al.  ONLINE HARASSMENT AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS , 2012 .

[42]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the internet among politically interested internet users , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[44]  B. Bushman,et al.  Moderating role of trait aggressiveness in the effects of violent media on aggression. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community , 2005, GROUP.

[46]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy , 1995 .

[47]  C. Hardaker,et al.  Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions , 2010 .

[48]  Brad J. Bushman,et al.  Individual Differences in the Extent and Development of Aggressive Cognitive-Associative Networks , 1996 .

[49]  Kit-Aun Tan,et al.  Normative Beliefs About Aggression as a Mediator of Narcissistic Exploitativeness and Cyberbullying , 2011, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[50]  William P. Eveland Interactions and Nonlinearity in Mass Communication: Connecting Theory and Methodology , 1997 .

[51]  J. Berry,et al.  From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News , 2011 .

[52]  R. Putnam The strange disappearance of civic America , 1996 .

[53]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Beyond Deliberation: New Directions for the Study of Informal Political Conversation from a Communication Perspective , 2011 .

[54]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[55]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[56]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[57]  Kelly A. Rocca,et al.  Trait verbal aggression, sports fan identification, and perceptions of appropriate sports fan communication , 1999 .

[58]  L. R. Huesmann,et al.  The Role of Social Norms in the Development of Aggressive Behavior , 1992 .

[59]  Rekha Menon,et al.  Child Nutrition, Child Health, and School Enrollment: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1997 .

[60]  Sabrina Eberhart,et al.  The Handbook Of Communication Science , 2016 .

[61]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[62]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Hot Diggity Blog: A Cluster Analysis Examining Motivations and Other Factors for Why People Judge Different Types of Blogs as Credible , 2011 .

[63]  Mona Khoury-Kassabri,et al.  Student victimization by school staff in the context of an Israeli national school safety campaign. , 2008, Aggressive behavior.

[64]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[65]  Shujun Wang,et al.  Exposure to violent computer games and Chinese adolescents' physical aggression: The role of beliefs about aggression, hostile expectations, and empathy , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[66]  B. Krahé,et al.  Playing violent electronic games, hostile attributional style, and aggression-related norms in German adolescents. , 2004, Journal of adolescence.

[67]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .

[68]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[69]  T. Postmes,et al.  Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[70]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior , 1991 .

[71]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[72]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Statistical Methods for Communication Science , 2005 .

[73]  Tatsuya Suda,et al.  Anonymity and roles associated with aggressive posts in an online forum , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..