Identifying Face Quality and Factor Measures for Video

This paper identifies important factors for face recognition algorithm performance in video. The goal of this study is to understand key factors that affect algorithm performance and to characterize the algorithm performance. We evaluate four factor metrics for a single video as well as two comparative metrics for pairs of videos. This study carried out an investigation of the effect of nine factors on three algorithms using the Point-and-Shoot Challenge (PaSC) video dataset. These factors can be categorized into three groups: 1) image/video (pose yaw, pose roll, face size, and face detection confidence); 2) environment (environmental condition with person’s activity and sensor model); and 3) subject (subject ID, gender, and race). For videobased face recognition, the analysis shows that the distribution-based methods were generally more effective in quantifying factor values. For predicting face recognition performance in a video, we observed that face detection confidence and face size serve as potentially useful quality measure metrics. We also find that male faces are easier to identify than female faces, and Asians are easier than Caucasians. Further, on the PaSC video dataset, the performance of face recognition algorithms are primarily driven by environment and sensor factors.

[1]  Rayford B. Vaughn,et al.  Information assurance measures and metrics - state of practice and proposed taxonomy , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[2]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  Principal Angles Separate Subject Illumination Spaces in YDB and CMU-PIE , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  An introduction to the good, the bad, & the ugly face recognition challenge problem , 2011, Face and Gesture 2011.

[4]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  Focus on quality, predicting FRVT 2006 performance , 2008, 2008 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition.

[5]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  On the existence of face quality measures , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[6]  Ken-ichi Maeda,et al.  Face recognition using temporal image sequence , 1998, Proceedings Third IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition.

[7]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 Large-Scale Experimental Results , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  P. Phillips,et al.  How features of the human face affect recognition: a statistical comparison of three face recognition algorithms , 2004, CVPR 2004.

[9]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  The challenge of face recognition from digital point-and-shoot cameras , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[10]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  A meta-analysis of face recognition covariates , 2009, 2009 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems.

[11]  George W. Quinn,et al.  Report on the Evaluation of 2D Still-Image Face Recognition Algorithms , 2011 .

[12]  James J. Filliben,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for biometric systems: A methodology based on orthogonal experiment designs , 2012, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[13]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  On the Existence of Face Quality Measures | NIST , 2013 .