Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders

Smartwatches provide technology-based assessments in Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is necessary to evaluate their reliability and accuracy in order to include those devices in an assessment. We present unique results for sensor validation and disease classification via machine learning (ML). A comparison setup was designed with two different series of Apple smartwatches, one Nanometrics seismometer and a high-precision shaker to measure tremor-like amplitudes and frequencies. Clinical smartwatch measurements were acquired from a prospective study including 450 participants with PD, differential diagnoses (DD) and healthy participants. All participants wore two smartwatches throughout a 15-min examination. Symptoms and medical history were captured on the paired smartphone. The amplitude error of both smartwatches reaches up to 0.005 g, and for the measured frequencies, up to 0.01 Hz. A broad range of different ML classifiers were cross-validated. The most advanced task of distinguishing PD vs. DD was evaluated with 74.1% balanced accuracy, 86.5% precision and 90.5% recall by Multilayer Perceptrons. Deep-learning architectures significantly underperformed in all classification tasks. Smartwatches are capable of capturing subtle tremor signs with low noise. Amplitude and frequency differences between smartwatches and the seismometer were under the level of clinical significance. This study provided the largest PD sample size of two-hand smartwatch measurements and our preliminary ML-evaluation shows that such a system provides powerful means for diagnosis classification and new digital biomarkers, but it remains challenging for distinguishing similar disorders.

[1]  Julian Varghese,et al.  The Smart Device System for Movement Disorders: Preliminary Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy in a Prospective Study , 2020, MIE.

[2]  Max A. Little,et al.  Technology in Parkinson's disease: Challenges and opportunities , 2016, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[3]  Maria Mahmood,et al.  WHITE STAG model: wise human interaction tracking and estimation (WHITE) using spatio-temporal and angular-geometric (STAG) descriptors , 2019, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[4]  A Parziale,et al.  Cartesian genetic programming for diagnosis of Parkinson disease through handwriting analysis: Performance vs. interpretability issues , 2021, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[5]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  The Balanced Accuracy and Its Posterior Distribution , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Dingguo Zhang,et al.  A Novel Posture for Better Differentiation Between Parkinson's Tremor and Essential Tremor , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[7]  J Hornegger,et al.  [Mobile biosensor-based gait analysis: a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in Parkinson's disease]. , 2011, Der Nervenarzt.

[8]  Anna Veronika Dorogush,et al.  CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features support , 2018, ArXiv.

[9]  D. Heldman,et al.  Clinician versus machine: reliability and responsiveness of motor endpoints in Parkinson's disease. , 2014, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[10]  Tim Oates,et al.  Time series classification from scratch with deep neural networks: A strong baseline , 2016, 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[11]  David J. Mack,et al.  Association between vestibulo-ocular reflex suppression, balance, gait, and fall risk in ageing and neurodegenerative disease: protocol of a one-year prospective follow-up study , 2015, BMC Neurology.

[12]  B. Eskofier,et al.  „Wearables“ in der Behandlung neurologischer Erkrankungen – wo stehen wir heute? , 2019, Der Nervenarzt.

[13]  M. Hallett,et al.  Consensus Statement on the classification of tremors. from the task force on tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society , 2018, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[14]  Poonam Zham,et al.  Efficacy of Guided Spiral Drawing in the Classification of Parkinson's Disease , 2018, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[15]  Claudia Manfredi,et al.  Analysis of facial expressions in parkinson's disease through video-based automatic methods , 2017, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  J. Varghese Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Chances and Challenges for Wide Clinical Adoption , 2020, Visceral Medicine.

[17]  Jens Havskov,et al.  Routine data processing in earthquake seismology , 2010 .

[18]  Max A. Little,et al.  Feasibility of large-scale deployment of multiple wearable sensors in Parkinson's disease , 2017, PloS one.

[19]  Gaurav Kumar,et al.  MATHEMATICS FOR MACHINE LEARNING , 2020, Journal of Mathematical Sciences & Computational Mathematics.

[20]  Larsson Omberg,et al.  Detecting confounding due to subject identification in clinical machine learning diagnostic applications: a permutation test approach , 2017 .

[21]  Iñaki Soto-Rey,et al.  A Smart Device System to Identify New Phenotypical Characteristics in Movement Disorders , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[22]  Ahmad Jalal,et al.  Wearable Inertial Sensors for Daily Activity Analysis Based on Adam Optimization and the Maximum Entropy Markov Model , 2020, Entropy.

[23]  R. Postuma Prodromal Parkinson disease: do we miss the signs? , 2019, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[24]  Gavin Hackeling,et al.  Mastering Machine Learning With scikit-learn , 2014 .

[25]  Michal Novotný,et al.  Speech disorders reflect differing pathophysiology in Parkinson’s disease, progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy , 2015, Journal of Neurology.

[26]  Roongroj Bhidayasiri,et al.  Parkinson’s Disease: Hoehn and Yahr Scale , 2012 .

[27]  N. M. Tahir,et al.  Feature selection for gait recognition , 2012, 2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research.

[28]  Asad Malik,et al.  Feature Selection Based on L1-Norm Support Vector Machine and Effective Recognition System for Parkinson’s Disease Using Voice Recordings , 2019, IEEE Access.