Intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning using single-field optimization: the impact of monitor unit constraints on plan quality.

PURPOSE To investigate the effect of monitor unit (MU) constraints on the dose distribution created by intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment planning using single-field optimization (SFO). METHODS Ninety-four energies between 72.5 and 221.8 MeV are available for scanning beam IMPT delivery at our institution. The minimum and maximum MUs for delivering each pencil beam (spot) are 0.005 and 0.04, respectively. These MU constraints are not considered during optimization by the treatment planning system; spots are converted to deliverable MUs during postprocessing. Treatment plans for delivering uniform doses to rectangular volumes with and without MU constraints were generated for different target doses, spot spacings, spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) widths, and ranges in a homogeneous phantom. Four prostate cancer patients were planned with and without MU constraints using different spot spacings. Rounding errors were analyzed using an in-house software tool. RESULTS From the phantom study, the authors have found that both the number of spots that have rounding errors and the magnitude of the distortion of the dose distribution from the ideally optimized distribution increases as the field dose, spot spacing, and range decrease and as the SOBP width increases. From our study of patient plans, it is clear that as the spot spacing decreases the rounding error increases, and the dose coverage of the target volume becomes unacceptable for very small spot spacings. CONCLUSIONS Constraints on deliverable MU for each spot could create a significant distortion from the ideally optimized dose distributions for IMPT fields using SFO. To eliminate this problem, the treatment planning system should incorporate the MU constraints in the optimization process and the delivery system should reliably delivery smaller minimum MUs.

[1]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Effect of anatomic motion on proton therapy dose distributions in prostate cancer treatment. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  He Wang,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of four target alignment methods for prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  A. Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization. , 1995, Medical physics.

[5]  Daniel W. Miller,et al.  Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system. , 2009, Medical physics.

[7]  D M Shepard,et al.  Direct aperture optimization: a turnkey solution for step-and-shoot IMRT. , 2002, Medical physics.

[8]  Uwe Titt,et al.  Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston. , 2009, Medical physics.

[9]  A. Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 1: the potential effects of calculational uncertainties , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Alessandra Bolsi,et al.  Treatment planning and verification of proton therapy using spot scanning: initial experiences. , 2004, Medical physics.

[11]  A J Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 2: the potential effects of inter-fraction and inter-field motions , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[13]  B. Dobler,et al.  Radiation Oncology Comparison of Direct Machine Parameter Optimization versus Fluence Optimization with Sequential Sequencing in Imrt of Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma , 2007 .

[14]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  SU-FF-T-150: Optimizing Spot Spacing and Margin for Intensity-Modualted Proton Therapy Planning , 2009 .

[15]  P. Andreo,et al.  Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water , 2001 .

[16]  D. Schardt,et al.  Magnetic scanning system for heavy ion therapy , 1993 .

[17]  E. Pedroni,et al.  Intensity modulated proton therapy: a clinical example. , 2001, Medical physics.

[18]  Michael Gillin,et al.  Spot scanning proton beam therapy for prostate cancer: treatment planning technique and analysis of consequences of rotational and translational alignment errors. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.