Aortic Root Measurement by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Specification of Planes and Lines of Measurement and Corresponding Normal Values

Background—Cardiovascular magnetic resonance is widely used for aortic root visualization and measurement, but methods still need to be standardized. Our aim was to identify appropriate planes of acquisition and lines of measurement and record corresponding normal values. Methods and Results—We studied 120 healthy volunteers, 10 of each gender in each decile between 20 and 80 years, by using a 1.5-T cardiovascular magnetic resonance system. Steady-state free precession cine acquisitions aligned with the left ventricular outflow tract in oblique sagittal and coronal orientations were used to locate 2 sinus planes that transected the root at its widest point in its maximally expanded systolic and at its end diastolic positions. We measured the cusp-cusp and the cusp-commissure dimensions in these cine planes, each as the average of 3. Diastolic cusp-commissure dimensions were smaller than diastolic cusp-cusp dimensions (32.0±3.5 mm versus 34.6±4.0 mm in men, 28.4±2.8 mm versus 30.7±3.3 mm in women, P<0.001 for both). The diastolic cusp-commissure dimensions increased by 0.9 mm per decade in men and 0.7 mm per decade in women (P<0.001 for both) and gave higher R2 values with respect to age and body surface area (0.40 for men, 0.27 for women) than diastolic cusp-cusp, systolic cusp-commissure, or sinus measurements made in the left ventricular outflow tract planes. Conclusions—The results indicate the importance of consistent methods for measurement of the aortic root by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. We recommend diastolic cusp-commissure measurements, which yielded favorable R2 values with respect to age and body surface area and were found to correspond closely with reference echocardiographic root measurements recorded in the Framingham cohort. We recorded reference values for these and other possible aortic root measurements by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

[1]  H. Kamiya,et al.  Aortic valve-sparing operation in Marfan syndrome: what do we know after a decade? , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Parallel imaging in cardiovascular MRI: methods and applications , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  J. Gardin,et al.  Usefulness of aortic root dimension in persons > or = 65 years of age in predicting heart failure, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality and acute myocardial infarction (from the Cardiovascular Health Study). , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  Denis Berdajs,et al.  The Anatomy of the Aortic Root , 2002, Cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  S. Ho,et al.  Anatomic basis of cross-sectional echocardiography , 1983, Heart.

[6]  R. Anderson Clinical anatomy of the aortic root , 2000, Heart.

[7]  P Boesiger,et al.  Heart motion adapted cine phase‐contrast flow measurements through the aortic valve , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  A. Weyman,et al.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of the progression of aortic root size in 127 patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: role of the supraaortic ridge and relation to the progression of the lesion. , 1997, American heart journal.

[9]  D. Levy,et al.  Echocardiographic reference values for aortic root size: the Framingham Heart Study. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[10]  D. Levy,et al.  Gender-Specific Reference M-Mode Values in Adults: Population-Derived Values with Consideration of the Impact of Height , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  D. Levy,et al.  Determinants of echocardiographic aortic root size. The Framingham Heart Study. , 1995, Circulation.

[12]  G. Sutherland,et al.  Anatomical basis of cross sectional echocardiography. , 1983, British heart journal.

[13]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Recommendations Regarding Quantitation in M-Mode Echocardiography: Results of a Survey of Echocardiographic Measurements , 1978, Circulation.

[14]  D. DuBois,et al.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known , 1989 .