Functional imaging of brain responses to different outcomes of hypothesis testing: revealed in a category induction task

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine differences in brain activation that occur when a person receives the different outcomes of hypothesis testing (HT). Participants were provided with a series of images of batteries and were asked to learn a rule governing what kinds of batteries were charged. Within each trial, the first two charged batteries were sequentially displayed, and participants would generate a preliminary hypothesis based on the perceptual comparison. Next, a third battery that served to strengthen, reject, or was irrelevant to the preliminary hypothesis was displayed. The fMRI results revealed that (1) no significant differences in brain activation were found between the 2 hypothesis-maintain conditions (i.e., strengthen and irrelevant conditions); and (2) compared with the hypothesis-maintain conditions, the hypothesis-reject condition activated the left medial frontal cortex, bilateral putamen, left parietal cortex, and right cerebellum. These findings are discussed in terms of the neural correlates of the subcomponents of HT and working memory manipulation.

[1]  Jun Tanji,et al.  Role for supplementary motor area cells in planning several movements ahead , 1994, Nature.

[2]  C. Kennard,et al.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  J. Schall,et al.  Performance monitoring by the supplementary eye ® eld , 2000 .

[6]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[7]  M. Petrides,et al.  Functional role of the basal ganglia in the planning and execution of actions , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[8]  N C Andreasen,et al.  Hypofrontality in neuroleptic-naive patients and in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Assessment with xenon 133 single-photon emission computed tomography and the Tower of London. , 1992, Archives of general psychiatry.

[9]  J. Tanji.  The supplementary motor area in the cerebral cortex , 1994, Neuroscience Research.

[10]  M. Brammer,et al.  Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event‐related tasks of cognitive control , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Prolonged Reaction Time to a Verbal Working Memory Task Predicts Increased Power of Posterior Parietal Cortical Activation , 2000, NeuroImage.

[12]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs , 2001, NeuroImage.

[13]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[15]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Differential involvement of left prefrontal cortexin inductive and deductive reasoning , 2004, Cognition.

[16]  Susan M. Courtney,et al.  Differential Neural Activation for Updating Rule versus Stimulus Information in Working Memory , 2008, Neuron.

[17]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  The Human Striatum is Necessary for Responding to Changes in Stimulus Relevance , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  M. Petrides,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Revisited: Distinct Neural Circuits Participating in Different Stages of the Task Identified by Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Zhouyi Guo,et al.  Learning and Memory Deficits Caused by a Lesion in the Medial Area of the Left Putamen in the Human Brain , 2009, CNS Spectrums.

[20]  Richard Coppola,et al.  Physiological activation of a cortical network during performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A positron emission tomography study , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Temporal course and the electrophysiological correlates of hypothesis testing as revealed in a modified category induction task , 2009, Brain Research.

[22]  J. Rowe,et al.  What “Works” in Working Memory? Separate Systems for Selection and Updating of Critical Information , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Anterior prefrontal cortex mediates rule learning in humans. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  L. Wasserman,et al.  Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure , 2002 .

[25]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Bradley Voytek,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia contributions to visual working memory , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[28]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Human category learning. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  P C Wason,et al.  Reasoning about a Rule , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task , 1997, Nature.

[31]  H Garavan,et al.  A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring , 2003, NeuroImage.

[32]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Performance Monitoring by the Anterior Cingulate Cortex During Saccade Countermanding , 2003, Science.

[33]  P. Haggard,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Intentional Inhibition in Human Action: the Power of 'no' , 2022 .

[34]  R. Dolan,et al.  Neural systems engaged by planning: a PET study of the Tower of London task , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  C. Kennard,et al.  Human Medial Frontal Cortex Mediates Unconscious Inhibition of Voluntary Action , 2007, Neuron.

[36]  Donald T. Stuss,et al.  Inhibitory Control is Slowed in Patients with Right Superior Medial Frontal Damage , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Christian Bellebaum,et al.  Focal basal ganglia lesions are associated with impairments in reward-based reversal learning. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  R. Elliott,et al.  Activation of Different Anterior Cingulate Foci in Association with Hypothesis Testing and Response Selection , 1998, NeuroImage.

[39]  Hong Li,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of hypothesis testing , 2009, Neuroreport.

[40]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Transient Activation of Superior Prefrontal Cortex during Inhibition of Cognitive Set , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Hong Li,et al.  Similar Brain Mechanism of Hypothesis-Testing Between Children and Adults , 2011, Developmental neuropsychology.

[43]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Dissociation of human mid-dorsolateral from posterior dorsolateral frontal cortex in memory processing. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[45]  T. Goldberg,et al.  Uncoupling Cognitive Workload and Prefrontal Cortical Physiology: A PET rCBF Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[46]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[47]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  The functional anatomy of the frontal lobes , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  Koji Jimura,et al.  Role for Presupplementary Motor Area in Inhibition of Cognitive Set Interference , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Dynamics of frontal, striatal, and hippocampal systems during rule learning. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  S. Shye.  Inductive and deductive reasoning: A structural reanalysis of ability tests. , 1988 .

[51]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Cortical and subcortical brain regions involved in rule-based category learning , 2005, Neuroreport.

[52]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Planning and Spatial Working Memory: a Positron Emission Tomography Study in Humans , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[53]  H. Karnath,et al.  Keeping Memory Clear and Stable—The Contribution of Human Basal Ganglia and Prefrontal Cortex to Working Memory , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Fabio Sambataro,et al.  Selective updating of working memory content modulates meso-cortico-striatal activity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[55]  Hong Li,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of hypothesis evaluation: Revealed with a modified Wason's selection task , 2011, Brain Research.

[56]  T. Robbins,et al.  Extra-dimensional versus intra-dimensional set shifting performance following frontal lobe excisions, temporal lobe excisions or amygdalo-hippocampectomy in man , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  Hillel Pratt,et al.  Time course and nature of stimulus evaluation in category induction as revealed by visual event-related potentials , 2004, Biological Psychology.