Atazanavir trough plasma concentration monitoring in a cohort of HIV-1-positive individuals receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES Atazanavir is a recently approved HIV protease inhibitor (PI). As with other PIs, careful attention to potential pharmacokinetic drug interactions in clinical practice is necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical associations with plasma atazanavir concentrations in HIV-positive individuals. METHODS Individuals established on an atazanavir-containing regimen, completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire recording atazanavir dosing characteristics, concomitant medication use and adherence. After completion, plasma atazanavir concentrations were measured. RESULTS Of 100 individuals, mean trough plasma atazanavir concentrations (mug/L) were 282 (95% CI 95-468, n = 19) and 774 (95% CI 646-902, n = 81) in those on non- and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir regimens, respectively. Eighty-five individuals had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL. Seven individuals had atazanavir plasma concentrations below the assay limit of detection (<50 microg/L), all of whom had undetectable plasma HIV RNA. In a multivariate analysis, nevirapine use was associated with significantly lower trough atazanavir concentrations (P = 0.011) and lopinavir/ritonavir use with higher trough atazanavir concentrations (P = 0.032). Dosing characteristics (including food taken), concomitant medications (including drugs used for dyspepsia) and HIV RNA were not significantly associated with trough atazanavir concentrations. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort, despite the wide inter-individual variability of atazanavir trough concentrations, no significant association with dosing characteristics, concomitant medication (with the exception of nevirapine and lopinavir/ritonavir) or virological response was observed. Further work is needed to assess the optimal dosing regimen when using atazanavir with nevirapine.

[1]  J. Gatell,et al.  Comparison of Once-Daily Atazanavir With Efavirenz, Each in Combination With Fixed-Dose Zidovudine and Lamivudine, As Initial Therapy for Patients Infected With HIV , 2004, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[2]  V. Calvez,et al.  Interactions between Atazanavir-Ritonavir and Tenofovir in Heavily Pretreated Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients , 2004, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[3]  P. Pham Drug profile: atazanavir (Reyataz, ATV). , 2003, The Hopkins HIV report : a bimonthly newsletter for healthcare providers.

[4]  R. Aarnoutse,et al.  Evaluation of antiretroviral drug measurements by an interlaboratory quality control program. , 2003, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[5]  G. Moyle Overcoming obstacles to the success of protease inhibitors in highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens. , 2002, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[6]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Impact of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy on Individual AIDS‐Defining Illness Incidence and Survival in Australia , 2002, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[7]  F. Hecht,et al.  Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy. , 2001 .

[8]  David A. Stock,et al.  BMS-232632, a Highly Potent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitor That Can Be Used in Combination with Other Available Antiretroviral Agents , 2000, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[9]  K. Röhss,et al.  Esomeprazole provides improved acid control vs. omeprazole in patients with symptoms of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease , 2000, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[10]  E. Acosta,et al.  Pharmacodynamics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors. , 2000, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[11]  G. Satten,et al.  Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  C. Flexner Dual protease inhibitor therapy in HIV-infected patients: pharmacologic rationale and clinical benefits. , 2000, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.