Predicting storm-triggered debris flow events: application to the 2009 Ionian Peloritan disaster (Sicily, Italy)

Abstract. The main assumption on which landslide susceptibility assessment by means of stochastic modelling lies is that the past is the key to the future. As a consequence, a stochastic model able to classify past known landslide events should be able to predict a future unknown scenario as well. However, storm-triggered multiple debris flow events in the Mediterranean region could pose some limits on the operative validity of such an expectation, as they are typically resultant of a randomness in time recurrence and magnitude and a great spatial variability, even at the scale of small catchments. This is the case for the 2007 and 2009 storm events, which recently hit north-eastern Sicily with different intensities, resulting in largely different disaster scenarios. The study area is the small catchment of the Itala torrent (10 km2), which drains from the southern Peloritani Mountains eastward to the Ionian Sea, in the territory of the Messina province (Sicily, Italy). Landslides have been mapped by integrating remote and field surveys, producing two event inventories which include 73 debris flows, activated in 2007, and 616 debris flows, triggered by the 2009 storm. Logistic regression was applied in order to obtain susceptibility models which utilize a set of predictors derived from a 2 m cell digital elevation model and a 1 : 50 000 scale geologic map. The research topic was explored by performing two types of validation procedures: self-validation, based on the random partition of each event inventory, and chrono-validation, based on the time partition of the landslide inventory. It was therefore possible to analyse and compare the performances both of the 2007 calibrated model in predicting the 2009 debris flows (forward chrono-validation), and vice versa of the 2009 calibrated model in predicting the 2007 debris flows (backward chrono-validation). Both of the two predictions resulted in largely acceptable performances in terms of fitting, skill and reliability. However, a loss of performance and differences in the selected predictors arose between the self-validated and the chrono-validated models. These are interpreted as effects of the non-linearity in the domain of the trigger intensity of the relationships between predictors and slope response, as well as in terms of the different spatial paths of the two triggering storms at the catchment scale.

[1]  W. Köppen,et al.  Die Klimate der Erde : Grundriss der Klimakunde , 1923 .

[2]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[3]  D. Varnes.  SLOPE MOVEMENT TYPES AND PROCESSES , 1978 .

[4]  E. E. Brabb.  Innovative approaches to landslide hazard and risk mapping , 1985 .

[5]  J. N. Hutchinson.  General report: morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology : Proc 5th International Symposium on Landslides, Lausanne, 10–15 July 1988V1, P3–35. Publ Rotterdam: A A Balkema, 1988 , 1988 .

[6]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[7]  Gary A. Peterson,et al.  Soil Attribute Prediction Using Terrain Analysis , 1993 .

[8]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Gis Technology in Mapping Landslide Hazard , 1995 .

[9]  Hans C. Jessen,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[10]  P. Atkinson,et al.  GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELLING IN GEOMORPHOLOGY , 1998 .

[11]  J. N. Hutchinson,et al.  A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type , 2001 .

[12]  Joseph D Conklin,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 2002, Technometrics.

[13]  P. Frattini,et al.  Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard , 2003 .

[14]  U. Ligges.  Review of An R and S-PLUS companion to applied regression by J. Fox, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California 2002 , 2003 .

[15]  John C. Davis,et al.  Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA , 2003 .

[16]  Andrea G. Fabbri,et al.  Validation of Spatial Prediction Models for Landslide Hazard Mapping , 2003 .

[17]  Peloritani continental crust composition (southern Italy); geological and petrochemical evidence , 2004 .

[18]  S. Oliveira,et al.  Integration of spatial and temporal data for the definition of different landslide hazard scenarios in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal) , 2004 .

[19]  V. Doyuran,et al.  A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate , 2004 .

[20]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale , 2005 .

[21]  Ricco Rakotomalala,et al.  TANAGRA : un logiciel gratuit pour l'enseignement et la recherche , 2005, EGC.

[22]  A. Brenning.  Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation , 2005 .

[23]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models , 2006 .

[24]  S. Beguería,et al.  Changes in land cover and shallow landslide activity: a case study in the Spanish Pyrenees , 2006 .

[25]  Olaf Conrad,et al.  SAGA - Entwurf, Funktionsumfang und Anwendung eines Systems für Automatisierte Geowissenschaftliche Analysen , 2007 .

[26]  G. Ohlmacher.  Plan curvature and landslide probability in regions dominated by earth flows and earth slides , 2007 .

[27]  H. A. Nefeslioglu,et al.  An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps , 2008 .

[28]  Christian Conoscenti,et al.  Soil erosion susceptibility assessment and validation using a geostatistical multivariate approach: a test in Southern Sicily , 2008 .

[29]  Christian Conoscenti,et al.  GIS analysis to assess landslide susceptibility in a fluvial basin of NW Sicily (Italy) , 2008 .

[30]  P. Frattini,et al.  Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment , 2008 .

[31]  Katrin Meusburger,et al.  On the influence of temporal change on the validity of landslide susceptibility maps in an alpine catchment, Switzerland , 2009 .

[32]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Combined landslide inventory and susceptibility assessment based on different mapping units: an example from the Flemish Ardennes, Belgium , 2009 .

[33]  Pinggen Zhou,et al.  GIS-Based and Data-Driven Bivariate Landslide-Susceptibility Mapping in the Three Gorges Area, China , 2009 .

[34]  Giovanni B. Crosta,et al.  Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models , 2010 .

[35]  Giuseppe Tito Aronica,et al.  Flash floods and debris flow in the city area of Messina, north-east part of Sicily, Italy in October 2009: the case of the Giampilieri catchment , 2010 .

[36]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Optimal landslide susceptibility zonation based on multiple forecasts , 2010 .

[37]  Christian Conoscenti,et al.  Exporting a Google Earth™ aided earth-flow susceptibility model: a test in central Sicily , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[38]  Christian Conoscenti,et al.  The role of the diagnostic areas in the assessment of landslide susceptibility models: a test in the sicilian chain , 2011 .

[39]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Autologistic modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the Central Apennines, Italy , 2011 .

[40]  Peter Lehmann,et al.  Spatial statistical modeling of shallow landslides—Validating predictions for different landslide inventories and rainfall events , 2011 .

[41]  Fausto Guzzetti,et al.  Semi-automatic recognition and mapping of rainfall induced shallow landslides using optical satellite images , 2011 .

[42]  M. Seta,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Upper Orcia Valley (Southern Tuscany, Italy) through conditional analysis: A contribution to the unbiased selection of causal factors , 2011 .

[43]  Neil C. Mitchell,et al.  Distribution and causes of landslides in the eastern Peloritani of NE Sicily and western Aspromonte of SW Calabria, Italy , 2011 .

[44]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  An integrated approach to the study of catastrophic debris-flows: geological hazard and human influence , 2012 .

[45]  F. Guzzetti,et al.  Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem , 2012 .

[46]  G. Gigli,et al.  Landslide inventory map for the Briga and the Giampilieri catchments, NE Sicily, Italy , 2012 .

[47]  C. Irigaray,et al.  Factors selection in landslide susceptibility modelling on large scale following the gis matrix method: application to the river Beiro basin (Spain) , 2012 .

[48]  Giuseppe T. Aronica,et al.  Assessment and mapping of debris-flow risk in a small catchment in eastern Sicily through integrated numerical simulations and GIS , 2012 .

[49]  Xueliang Wang,et al.  Regional landslide susceptibility zoning with considering the aggregation of landslide points and the weights of factors , 2014, Landslides.

[50]  C. Irigaray,et al.  Forward logistic regression for earth-flow landslide susceptibility assessment in the Platani river basin (southern Sicily, Italy) , 2014, Landslides.

[51]  S. Leroueil,et al.  The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update , 2014, Landslides.

[52]  Salvatore Scudero,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Peloritani Mts. (Sicily, Italy) and clues for tectonic control of relief processes , 2013 .

[53]  A. Brenning,et al.  Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps – case study Lower Austria , 2014 .

[54]  Enrico Foti,et al.  A comparative assessment of two different debris flow propagation approaches – blind simulations on a real debris flow event , 2014 .

[55]  Shou-Hao Chiang,et al.  Modeling the spatial occurrence of shallow landslides triggered by typhoons , 2014 .

[56]  Antonino Cancelliere,et al.  Derivation and evaluation of landslide-triggering thresholds by a Monte Carlo approach , 2014 .

[57]  D. Or,et al.  Monitoring and prediction in early warning systems for rapid mass movements , 2014 .

[58]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  The Influence of Land Use Change on Landslide Susceptibility Zonation: The Briga Catchment Test Site (Messina, Italy) , 2013, Environmental Management.

[59]  Samuele Segoni,et al.  Technical Note: An operational landslide early warning system at regional scale based on space–time-variable rainfall thresholds , 2014 .

[60]  M. Becht,et al.  Sample size matters: investigating the effect of sample size on a logistic regression susceptibility model for debris flows , 2014 .

[61]  E. Rotigliano,et al.  A test of transferability for landslides susceptibility models under extreme climatic events: application to the Messina 2009 disaster , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[62]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  Remote sensing as tool for development of landslide databases: The case of the Messina Province (Italy) geodatabase , 2015 .

[63]  Claudia Meisina,et al.  Site-specific to local-scale shallow landslides triggering zones assessment using TRIGRS , 2015 .

[64]  Roland Kaitna,et al.  Modeling debris-flow runout patterns on two alpine fans with different dynamic simulation models , 2015 .

[65]  Samuele Segoni,et al.  Quantitative comparison between two different methodologies to define rainfall thresholds for landslide forecasting , 2015 .

[66]  C. Tseng,et al.  Landslide susceptibility analysis by means of event-based multi-temporal landslide inventories , 2015 .

[67]  Fausto Guzzetti,et al.  Calibration and validation of rainfall thresholds for shallow landslide forecasting in Sicily, southern Italy. , 2015 .

[68]  Richard Gloaguen,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping in Mawat area, Kurdistan Region, NE Iraq: a comparison of different statistical models , 2015 .