The design and development of domestic smart grid interventions: Insights from the Netherlands

Abstract When studying smart grids experiments, much scholarly attention is directed at the household level. This article argues for the importance to look “further upstream” by studying the development and design phase of such interventions. The article focusses on the development of two smart grid projects in the Netherlands. Using a set of qualitative research approaches the article investigates and maps the diversity of actors that are typically involved in smart grid projects. Three themes are identified that play a central role in the design of smart energy interventions. Given the type of actors prominent in the design, this article finds that current smart energy interventions are designed based on decisions favouring technological default, certain sticky user-assumptions, and automated control. The discussion covers some implications of the prominence of these particular actors in smart grid projects, and the supply-side biased design that it engenders.

[1]  Angelina H.M.E. Reinders,et al.  Empowering the end-user in smart grids: Recommendations for the design of products and services , 2013 .

[2]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004) , 2007 .

[3]  Ji Johanna Höffken,et al.  Smart Business for Smart Users: A Social Agenda for Developing Smart Grids , 2016 .

[4]  Inge Røpke,et al.  Constructing users in the smart grid—insights from the Danish eFlex project , 2013 .

[5]  Niamh Murtagh,et al.  Managing professional jurisdiction and domestic energy use , 2018 .

[6]  Theodore R. Schatzki,et al.  The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events , 2010 .

[7]  M. Akrich.  User Representations: Practices, Methods and Sociology , 1995 .

[8]  William Throndsen,et al.  What do experts talk about when they talk about users? Expectations and imagined users in the smart grid , 2017 .

[9]  G. Verbong,et al.  Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy , 2013 .

[10]  S. Woolgar.  Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[11]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Learning about and involving users in energy saving on the local level , 2013 .

[12]  Ji Johanna Höffken,et al.  Is the resource man coming home? : engaging with an energy monitoring platform to foster flexible energy consumption in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[13]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? , 2013 .

[14]  Ângela Guimarães Pereira,et al.  What smart grids tell about innovation narratives in the European Union: Hopes, imaginaries and policy , 2016 .

[15]  Brit Ross Winthereik,et al.  Innovating Relations - or why smart grid is not too complex for the public , 2013 .

[16]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects , 2018 .

[17]  Sampsa Hyysalo,et al.  User representation: A journey towards conceptual maturation , 2016 .

[18]  Lea Schick,et al.  Flexible and inflexible energy engagements—A study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy , 2015 .

[19]  G. Fulli,et al.  A business case for Smart Grid technologies: A systemic perspective , 2011 .

[20]  Thomas Berker,et al.  Planning story lines in smart grid road maps (2010–2014): three types of maps for coordinated time travel , 2017 .

[21]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Making it experimental in several ways: The work of intermediaries in raising the ambition level in local climate initiatives , 2017 .

[22]  C. Lindkvist,et al.  Ambivalence, designing users and user imaginaries in the European smart grid: Insights from an interdisciplinary demonstration project , 2015 .

[23]  I. Ballo.  Imagining energy futures: Sociotechnical imaginaries of the future Smart Grid in Norway , 2015 .

[24]  Ijeoma Onyeji,et al.  Consumer engagement: An insight from smart grid projects in Europe , 2013 .

[25]  Derk Loorbach,et al.  Actor roles in transition: Insights from sociological perspectives , 2017 .

[26]  Rm Ruth Mourik,et al.  User-centred sustainable business model design: The case of energy efficiency services in the Netherlands , 2018 .

[27]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[28]  Anna J. Wieczorek,et al.  Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review , 2016, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[29]  Tom Hargreaves.  Beyond energy feedback , 2018 .

[30]  A. Petersen,et al.  Exploring the Transition Potential of Renewable Energy Communities , 2015 .

[31]  Aurélie Tricoire,et al.  Uncertainty, vision, and the vitality of the emerging smart grid , 2015 .

[32]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .