A Comparison between the 4DVAR and the Ensemble Kalman Filter Techniques for Radar Data Assimilation

Abstract A four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVAR) algorithm is compared to an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) for the assimilation of radar data at the convective scale. Using a cloud-resolving model, simulated, imperfect radar observations of a supercell storm are assimilated under the assumption of a perfect forecast model. Overall, both assimilation schemes perform well and are able to recover the supercell with comparable accuracy, given radial-velocity and reflectivity observations where rain was present. 4DVAR produces generally better analyses than the EnKF given observations limited to a period of 10 min (or three volume scans), particularly for the wind components. In contrast, the EnKF typically produces better analyses than 4DVAR after several assimilation cycles, especially for model variables not functionally related to the observations. The advantages of the EnKF in later cycles arise at least in part from the fact that the 4DVAR scheme implemented here does not use a forecast ...

[1]  P. Courtier,et al.  Variational Assimilation of Meteorological Observations With the Adjoint Vorticity Equation. I: Theory , 2007 .

[2]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Hydrologic Data Assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2002 .

[3]  Jeffrey L. Anderson.  An Ensemble Adjustment Kalman Filter for Data Assimilation , 2001 .

[4]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  A Monte Carlo Implementation of the Nonlinear Filtering Problem to Produce Ensemble Assimilations and Forecasts , 1999 .

[5]  P. Houtekamer,et al.  An Adaptive Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2000 .

[6]  Mingjing Tong,et al.  Ensemble kalman filter assimilation of doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model : OSS experiments , 2005 .

[7]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic noise reduction , 2001 .

[8]  P. Courtier,et al.  Variational Assimilation of Meteorological Observations With the Adjoint Vorticity Equation. Ii: Numerical Results , 2007 .

[9]  J. M. Lewis,et al.  The use of adjoint equations to solve a variational adjustment problem with advective constraints , 1985 .

[10]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Real-Time Low-Level Wind and Temperature Analysis Using Single WSR-88D Data , 2001 .

[11]  G. Evensen.  Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi‐geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics , 1994 .

[12]  Andrew C. Lorenc,et al.  The potential of the ensemble Kalman filter for NWP—a comparison with 4D‐Var , 2003 .

[13]  F. L. Dimet,et al.  Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects , 1986 .

[14]  Monique Tanguay,et al.  Four‐dimensional data assimilation with a wide range of scales , 1995 .

[15]  James A. Hansen.  Accounting for Model Error in Ensemble-Based State Estimation and Forecasting , 2002 .

[16]  C.,et al.  Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction , 2022 .

[17]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Wind and Thermodynamic Retrieval from Single-Doppler Measurements of a Gust Front Observed during Phoenix II , 1994 .

[18]  P. Houtekamer,et al.  Data Assimilation Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter Technique , 1998 .

[19]  Tianfeng Chai,et al.  On the smoothness constraints for four-dimensional data assimilation , 2002 .

[20]  R. Daley.  Atmospheric Data Analysis , 1991 .

[21]  J. Whitaker,et al.  Distance-dependent filtering of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter , 2001 .

[22]  S. Cohn,et al.  An Introduction to Estimation Theory , 1997 .

[23]  Stephen E. Cohn,et al.  An Introduction to Estimation Theory (gtSpecial IssueltData Assimilation in Meteology and Oceanography: Theory and Practice) , 1997 .

[24]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Dynamical and Microphysical Retrieval from Doppler Radar Observations Using a Cloud Model and Its Adjoint. Part I: Model Development and Simulated Data Experiments. , 1997 .

[25]  S. Cohn,et al.  Ooce Note Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation Construction of Correlation Functions in Two and Three Dimensions and Convolution Covariance Functions , 2022 .

[26]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Impacts of Initial Estimate and Observation Availability on Convective-Scale Data Assimilation with an Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2004 .

[27]  P. Houtekamer,et al.  A Sequential Ensemble Kalman Filter for Atmospheric Data Assimilation , 2001 .

[28]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Assimilating Radar, Surface, and Profiler Data for the Sydney 2000 Forecast Demonstration Project , 2001 .

[29]  J. Whitaker,et al.  Ensemble Data Assimilation without Perturbed Observations , 2002 .

[30]  Chris Snyder,et al.  Toward a nonlinear ensemble filter for high‐dimensional systems , 2003 .

[31]  C. Snyder,et al.  Assimilation of Simulated Doppler Radar Observations with an Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2003 .

[32]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Dynamical and Microphysical Retrieval from Doppler Radar Observations Using a Cloud Model and Its Adjoint. Part II: Retrieval Experiments of an Observed Florida Convective Storm , 1998 .

[33]  J. Mahfouf,et al.  The ecmwf operational implementation of four‐dimensional variational assimilation. III: Experimental results and diagnostics with operational configuration , 2000 .

[34]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  Wind and Temperature Retrievals in the 17 May 1981 Arcadia, Oklahoma, Supercell: Ensemble Kalman Filter Experiments , 2004 .