Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Temperament and Character Inventory.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), a self-report questionnaire based on Cloninger's biosocial model of personality. The TCI was translated into Korean and administered to 851 Korean college students. A test-retest study of the TCI was conducted across a 3-month interval with 130 subjects. Internal consistency was calculated by Cronbach alpha. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. Factor analyses for the temperament and character dimensions were performed using principal component analysis, rotating factors obliquely by promax. A comparison of TCI scores between Korean and United States college students was done using independent t tests. Cronbach alpha values for the TCI scales ranged from.60 to.85 for the temperament scales and from.82 to.87 for the character scales. Test-retest correlations (r) ranged from.52 to.72 for the temperament scales and from.52 to.71 for the character scales. Principal component factor analyses showed similar factor structures of four temperaments and three characters as the American version of the TCI, except for the Reward Dependence and Persistence temperament scales. Explorative factor analysis with a condition of eigenvalue greater than 1 produced five factors, as compared to seven factors extracted in Cloninger's original report. Results using a preset seven-factor solution was forced and did not successfully extract Cloninger's seven factors. Korean college students had higher mean scores on Harm Avoidance and lower mean scores on the rest of the scales as compared to a sample of US college students. The results of this study confirm that the Korean TCI has satisfactory psychometric properties and reflects Cloninger's biosocial model of personality.

[1]  H. Eysenck,et al.  The nature of extraversion: a genetical analysis. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  H. Eysenck The learning theory model of neurosis--a new approach. , 1976, Behaviour research and therapy.

[3]  Dragan M. Svrakic,et al.  The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire: U.S. Normative Data , 1991, Psychological reports.

[4]  C. Robert Cloninger,et al.  Further contribution to the conceptual validity of the unified biosocial model of personality: US and Yugoslav data. , 1991, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[5]  P. Costa,et al.  Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. , 1992 .

[6]  L. Clark,et al.  A reanalysis of the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) and its relation to Cloninger's Type 2 alcoholism. , 1993 .

[7]  A. Yoshino,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire among university students. , 1993, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[8]  C. R. Cloninger,et al.  A psychobiological model of temperament and character. , 1993, Archives of general psychiatry.

[9]  C. R. Cloninger,et al.  Differential diagnosis of personality disorders by the seven-factor model of temperament and character. , 1993, Archives of general psychiatry.

[10]  N. Martin,et al.  Testing a model for the genetic structure of personality: a comparison of the personality systems of Cloninger and Eysenck. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  C. Robert Cloninger,et al.  Temperament predicts clomipramine and desipramine response in major depression. , 1994, Journal of affective disorders.

[12]  C. R. Cloninger,et al.  The temperament and character inventory (TCI) : a guide to its development and use , 1994 .

[13]  Mark D. Wood,et al.  The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity Studies and Derivation of a Short Form. , 1995 .

[14]  C. Robert Cloninger,et al.  The tridimensional personality questionnaire as a predictor of response to nefazodone treatment of depression. , 1995, Journal of affective disorders.

[15]  Genetic and Environmental Structure of the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire: Three or Four Temperament Dimensions? , 1996 .

[16]  R. Ebstein,et al.  Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[17]  D. Murphy,et al.  Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[18]  L. Siever,et al.  D4 dopamine-receptor (DRD4) alleles and novelty seeking in substance-dependent, personality-disorder, and control subjects. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  C. R. Cloninger,et al.  Measurement of temperament and character in mood disorders: a model of fundamental states as personality types. , 1998, Journal of affective disorders.

[20]  C. Robert Cloninger,et al.  Temperament, character, and personality disorders. , 1998, Journal of personality disorders.

[21]  T. Przybeck,et al.  Swedish normative data on personality using the Temperament and Character Inventory. , 1998, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[22]  P. Sullivan,et al.  No association between novelty seeking and the type 4 dopamine receptor gene (DRD4) in two New Zealand samples. , 1998, The American journal of psychiatry.

[23]  P. Costa,et al.  Do the dimensions of the temperament and character inventory map a simple genetic architecture? Evidence from molecular genetics and factor analysis. , 2000, The American journal of psychiatry.

[24]  J. Lépine,et al.  Normative data and factor structure of the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) in the French version , 2000, Psychiatry Research.