Public trust in institutions and information sources regarding risk management and communication: towards integrating extant knowledge

The present article attempts an integrative review of knowledge on public trust in institutions and information sources regarding risk management and communication. The review is based on 27 empirical studies, and is organised around four groups of trust‐related factors. The empirical studies reveal that this field of research suffers from a lack of consistency in conceptualising ‘trust’. Based on the review, a ‘layering’ of four different aspects of trust, from more general to more specific, has been designed, reflecting the identified layers of trust‐related factors vis‐à‐vis: (1) socio‐cultural and individual personality characteristics; (2) perceived attributes of institution or information source; (3) risk aspects; (4) information‐specific aspects. This layered conceptualisation of trust demonstrates that trust in those managing and communicating risk is a complex phenomenon operative simultaneously in and interplaying across a number of levels.

[1]  N. Allum.  An Empirical Test of Competing Theories of Hazard‐Related Trust: The Case of GM Food , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  N. Rexha,et al.  Determinants of three facets of customer trust: A marketing model of Japanese buyer-supplier relationship , 2004 .

[3]  A. Knight.  Intervening Effects of Knowledge, Morality, Trust, and Benefits on Support for Animal and Plant Biotechnology Applications , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[5]  Paul Upham,et al.  Applying environmental-behaviour concepts to renewable energy siting controversy: Reflections on a longitudinal bioenergy case study , 2009 .

[6]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[8]  Helmut Jungermann,et al.  Credibility, Information Preferences, and Information Interests , 1995 .

[9]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[10]  Keith S. Coulter,et al.  Determinants of trust in a service provider: the moderating role of length of relationship , 2002 .

[11]  C. Hanf,et al.  Confidence lost and — partially — regained: consumer response to food scares , 2000 .

[12]  Joachim Scholderer,et al.  Communicating about the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods: The Mediating Role of Trust , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Linda Ferrell,et al.  Consumers' trust of salesperson and manufacturer: an empirical study , 2001 .

[14]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  Y. Maeda,et al.  Determinants of Trust in Industry, Government, and Citizen's Groups in Japan , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Linda R. Weber,et al.  On constructing trust: temporality, self‐disclosure, and perspective‐taking , 1998 .

[17]  Matthew H. Roy,et al.  Developing Trust: The Importance of Cognitive Flexibility and Co-Operative Contexts , 1998 .

[18]  T. Earle,et al.  Thinking Aloud about Trust: A Protocol Analysis of Trust in Risk Management , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Shared Values, Social Trust, and the Perception of Geographic Cancer Clusters , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Credibility and trust in risk communication , 1991 .

[21]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  New Information and Social Trust: Asymmetry and Perseverance of Attributions about Hazard Managers , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  K. Newton,et al.  Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven nations , 2002 .

[23]  G. Dapiran,et al.  Are co‐operation and trust being confused with power? An analysis of food retailing in Australia and the UK , 2003 .

[24]  Raymond Fisman,et al.  Is Trust a Historical Residue? Information Flows and Trust Levels , 1999 .

[25]  D. Cowles.  The role of trust in customer relationships: asking the right questions , 1997 .

[26]  J. Eiser,et al.  Marginal Trust in Risk Managers: Building and Losing Trust Following Decisions Under Uncertainty , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  A. Warde,et al.  Recuperating from BSE: The shifting UK institutional basis for trust in food , 2006, Appetite.

[28]  Susan Miles,et al.  The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[29]  V T Covello,et al.  The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[30]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  J. Eiser,et al.  Trust, Perceived Risk, and Attitudes Toward Food Technologies , 2002 .

[32]  Wallace M. S. Yee,et al.  Trust building in livestock farmers: an exploratory study , 2002 .

[33]  Sabine Pahl,et al.  Trust in Risky Messages: The Role of Prior Attitudes , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  R Shepherd,et al.  What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[35]  William Leiss,et al.  “Down and Dirty:” The Use and Abuse of Public Trust in Risk Communication , 1995 .

[36]  F. Selnes.  Antecedents and consequences of trust and satisfaction in buyer‐seller relationships , 1998 .

[37]  Eric M. Uslaner,et al.  Democracy and Trust: Democracy and social capital , 1999 .

[38]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. , 1996 .

[39]  M. Siegrist.  The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[40]  Matthew T.G. Meulenberg,et al.  A Note on Modeling Consumer Reactions to a Crisis: The Case of the Mad Cow Disease , 2002 .

[41]  Michael R Greenberg,et al.  Geographical Dimensions and Correlates of Trust , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[42]  Devon S. Johnson,et al.  Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships , 2005 .

[43]  Ewald A. Kaluscha,et al.  Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[44]  Susan Miles,et al.  Temporal stability of the psychological determinants of trust: Implications for communication about food risks , 2003 .

[45]  C. Hampden-Turner,et al.  Riding the waves of culture , 2009 .

[46]  L. Frewer,et al.  Trust in sources of information about genetically modified food risks in the UK , 2001 .

[47]  J M Morse,et al.  An exploration and advancement of the concept of trust. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[48]  J. Barnett,et al.  Belief in Public Efficacy, Trust, and Attitudes Toward Modern Genetic Science , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[49]  N. Coulson.  Source of food safety information: whom do adolescents trust? , 2002, Appetite.

[50]  Susanna Hornig Priest,et al.  The “Trust Gap” Hypothesis: Predicting Support for Biotechnology Across National Cultures as a Function of Trust in Actors , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[51]  L Sjöberg,et al.  Limits of Knowledge and the Limited Importance of Trust , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[52]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Trust in Risk Regulation: Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of GM Food? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[53]  James A. Young,et al.  How now, mad‐cow? Consumer confidence and source credibility during the 1996 BSE scare , 1999 .

[54]  Timothy C. Earle,et al.  Culture, Cosmopolitanism, and Risk Management , 1997 .

[55]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[56]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities , 1998 .

[57]  A. Sohal,et al.  An examination of the relationship between trust, commitment and relationship quality , 2002 .

[58]  Mattias Viklund.  Trust and Risk Perception in Western Europe: A Cross‐National Study , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.