LCA and C-LCC Indicator as Tools for Sodium-Ion Batteries’ Eco-Design

Sodium-ion batteries are considered promising alternatives to lithium-ion technology; however, the diffusion on a commercial scale is hindered by the struggle to identify materials with high electrochemical performances. Studies available in the literature are mainly focused on electrochemical performance and neglect aspects related to the environmental sustainability. In fact, the current state-of-the-art (presented in this study) shows that life cycle assessment (LCA) studies related to the production processes of electrode materials for Na-ion batteries are still very limited. The LCA methodology applied during the development of a technology phase can constitute a valid support for an eco-oriented design and, therefore, to the choice of solutions characterized by a lower environmental impact with the same electrochemical performance. In this context, a life cycle-based environmental–economic assessment was performed to evaluate the environmental impacts of the production process of cathode and anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. The study is focused on the cathodic active material Na0.66MnO2, considering two synthesis paths, and the anodic material consisting of tin (Sn) and Sn-carbon nanofiber (Sn-Cn) active material, binder, and other additives. Results illustrate the environmental performance of the different materials and constitute a useful input for their selection within an eco-design view.

[1]  P. Shirage,et al.  Transition metal oxides as a cathode for indispensable Na-ion batteries , 2022, RSC advances.

[2]  Ehsan Vahidi,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of synthesis routes for cathode materials in sodium-ion batteries , 2022, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[3]  Y. Meng,et al.  Perspective: Design of cathode materials for sustainable sodium-ion batteries , 2022, MRS Energy & Sustainability.

[4]  E. Brivio,et al.  Sodium-Ion Batteries with Ti1Al1TiC1.85 MXene as Negative Electrode: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Critical Resource Use Analysis , 2022, Sustainability.

[5]  M. Reddy,et al.  SnO2 Quantum Dots Distributed along V2O5 Nanobelts for Utilization as a High-Capacity Storage Hybrid Material in Li-Ion Batteries , 2021, Molecules.

[6]  Tong Qiu,et al.  A life cycle assessment of hard carbon anodes for sodium-ion batteries , 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[7]  C. Scown,et al.  Life‐Cycle Assessment Considerations for Batteries and Battery Materials , 2021, Advanced Energy Materials.

[8]  M. Carvalho,et al.  The Commodity Life Cycle Costing Indicator. An Economic Measure of Natural Resource Use in the Life Cycle , 2021, Sustainability.

[9]  A. Malara,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of Fe2O3-based fibers as anode materials for sodium-ion batteries , 2020, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[10]  M. Shahzad,et al.  Prospects in anode materials for sodium ion batteries - A review , 2020 .

[11]  S. Passerini,et al.  A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries , 2018 .

[12]  Li-zhen Fan,et al.  Research and application progress on key materials for sodium-ion batteries , 2017 .

[13]  A. B. Gallo,et al.  Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review , 2016 .

[14]  Jens F. Peters,et al.  Life cycle assessment of sodium-ion batteries , 2016 .

[15]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[16]  G. Cao,et al.  Understanding electrochemical potentials of cathode materials in rechargeable batteries , 2016 .

[17]  Vikas Khanna,et al.  Carbon Nanofiber Production , 2008 .

[18]  J. Binder,et al.  On the environmental competitiveness of sodium-ion batteries under a full life cycle perspective – a cell-chemistry specific modelling approach , 2021, Sustainable Energy & Fuels.

[19]  M. Weil,et al.  A review of hard carbon anode materials for sodium-ion batteries and their environmental assessment , 2019, Matériaux & Techniques.

[20]  Elina Johansson,et al.  Life cycle analysis on phase change materials for thermal energy storage , 2019 .

[21]  Sala Serenella,et al.  Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods , 2018 .

[22]  Q. Dai Life Cycle Assessment of Natural Gas Utilization in Light-duty Passenger Vehicles. , 2014 .

[23]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2 , 2010 .

[24]  COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS , 2009 .