Abstract A dominant theme in innovation policy throughout the world has been the support of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Although policy-making has been evolving away from simplistic and `universal' measures addressing all SMEs towards more targeted approaches, there is still a lack of knowledge about the nature and extent of SME support needs and the mechanisms for delivering it effectively. The result is that the policy environment is characterised by a wide range of experimentation; this paper reports on one such experiment—Supernet—aimed at improving the access of SMEs to major centres of technological excellence in the UK. During its two and a half years of operation Supernet largely succeeded in establishing a mechanism through which SMEs could access the extensive technology base of the UK. Its limitations were less in execution (indeed, overall management of the operation was generally well-regarded) than in positioning. As a stand-alone venture it was probably too specialised a service for the needs of many SMEs (although valuable for a few) but as part of a broad spectrum of innovation support it filled an important niche, complementing other, more locally oriented types of provision, particularly those being developed by the `Business Links' network. The paper reviews the history of Supernet and explores some of the issues that its implementation raises for innovation policy. In particular, it argues that there is a need for some form of managed network enabling access for SMEs to the technology infrastructure within a national system of innovation. It concludes with some thoughts on the design and operation of such a network based on lessons offered by the Supernet experience.
[1]
John Bessant,et al.
Technology Institutes: Strategies for Best Practice
,
1996
.
[2]
K. Pavitt.
Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy
,
1984
.
[3]
R. Oakey,et al.
High Technology Small Firms
,
1984
.
[4]
Sydney Gregory,et al.
Industrial innovation and public policy: R Rothwell and W Zegveld London (1981) 251 pp
,
1982
.
[5]
H. Schmitz,et al.
Collective Efficiency and Increasing Returns
,
1997
.
[6]
H. Rush,et al.
Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer
,
1995
.
[7]
R. Rothwell.
Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s
,
1992
.
[8]
John Bessant,et al.
Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review
,
1998
.
[9]
J. Tromm.
Europe's Next Step
,
1992
.
[10]
M. Hobday,et al.
Strategies for Best Practice in Research and Technology Institutes
,
1995
.
[11]
W. Diebold,et al.
The Second Industrial Divide
,
1985
.
[12]
Ernst Braun.
Industrial innovation and public policy
,
1982
.
[13]
R. Nelson.
Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?
,
1991
.
[14]
Ray Oakey,et al.
High Technology Small Firms: Their Potential for Rapid Industrial Growth
,
1991
.
[15]
David C. Mowery,et al.
Technology and the Wealth of Nations
,
1992
.
[16]
John Bessant,et al.
Effective Innovation Policy: A New Approach
,
1997
.
[17]
John R. Opel,et al.
Technology and the wealth of nations
,
1987
.