The fatigue limit and its elimination

The classical fatigue limit of ferrous metals is a consequence of testing materials at a constant range of cyclic stress and determining the cyclic stress range below which fatigue failures do not occur. This classical fatigue limit of a material is equated to the condition for which fatigue cracks can not propagate beyond microstructural barriers. This paper discusses the causes, leading to the elimination of this fatigue limit, including the introduction of transitory cyclic-dependent mechanisms and time-dependent processes that will permit a previously non-propagating crack to grow across the different threshold states expressed in terms of linear-elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM), elastic-plastic fracture mechanics (EPFM) and microstructural fracture mechanics (MFM). These transitory mechanisms and processes include different loading and environmental conditions, which in a long-life engineering plant (e.g. 30 years lifetime) can lead to apparently premature failures. Of greater concern is the creation of a new crack-initiation zone, i.e. a transfer from a surface-generated crack to an internal-generated crack that eventually dominates the fatigue failure event. The impact of these conditions on the elimination of the classical fatigue limit necessitates changes in Design Codes of Practice, and such changes are discussed in relation to the extremely long-lifetime regime (10 7

[1]  W. Rizk,et al.  Investigations into the Failure of Gas Circulators and Circuit Components at Hinkley Point Nuclear Power Station , 1964 .

[2]  E. R. Rios,et al.  ANALYSIS OF CRACK TIP HYDROGEN DISTRIBUTION UNDER I/II MIXED MODE LOADS , 1994 .

[3]  K. Kanazawa,et al.  Fatigue fracture of low alloy steel at ultrahighcycle region under elevated temperature condition. , 1997 .

[4]  W. L. Server,et al.  Residual life assessment of major light water reactor components: Overview , 1989 .

[5]  W. L. Server,et al.  Residual life assessment of light water reactor pressure vessels , 1987 .

[6]  N. Thompson,et al.  Xi. The origin of fatigue fracture in copper , 1956 .

[7]  K. J. Miller,et al.  The application of microstructural fracture mechanics to various metal surface states , 1997 .

[8]  K. J. Miller,et al.  INITIATION AND GROWTH OF CRACKS IN BIAXIAL FATIGUE , 1979 .

[9]  K. G. DeWall,et al.  Survey of aged power plant facilities , 1985 .

[10]  K. Miller,et al.  The three thresholds for fatigue crack propagation , 1997 .

[11]  W. J. Plumbridge,et al.  Influence of a zero-load rest period in elevated-temperature fatigue , 1976 .

[12]  K. J. Miller,et al.  A Theory for Fatigue Failure under Multiaxial Stress-Strain Conditions , 1973 .

[13]  K J Miller,et al.  Increases in fatigue life caused by the introduction of rest periods , 1972 .

[15]  Masayuki Takada,et al.  Super-long life tension–compression fatigue properties of quenched and tempered 0.46% carbon steel , 1998 .

[16]  E. R. Rios,et al.  FORMATION OF HYDROGEN-ASSISTED INTERGRANULAR CRACKS IN HIGH STRENGTH STEELS , 1995 .

[17]  D. L. Berry,et al.  Report of results of nuclear power plant aging workshops , 1984 .

[18]  A. Navarro,et al.  Short and long fatigue crack growth: A unified model , 1988 .

[19]  M. Gell,et al.  Mechanisms of Fatigue in the Creep Range , 1971 .