All about Acceptability?: Identifying Factors for the Adoption of Data Glasses

Innovations often trigger objections before becoming widely accepted. This paper assesses whether a familiarisation over time can be expected for data glasses, too. While user attitudes towards those devices have been reported to be prevalently negative [14], it is still unclear, to what extent this initial, negative user attitude might impede adoption. However, indepth understanding is crucial for reducing barriers early in order to gain access to potential benefits from the technology. With this paper we contribute to a better understanding of factors affecting data glasses adoption, as well as current trends and opinions. Our multiple-year case study (N=118) shows, against expectations, no significant change towards a more positive attitude between 2014 and 2016. We complement these findings with an expert survey (N=51) investigating prognoses, challenges and discussing the relevance of social acceptability. We elicit and contrast a controversial spectrum of expert opinions, and assess whether initial objections can be overwritten. Our analysis shows that while social acceptability is considered relevant for the time being, utility and usability are more valued for long-term adoption.

[1]  Daniel W. E. Hein,et al.  Fashion or Technology? A Fashnology Perspective on the Perception and Adoption of Augmented Reality Smart Glasses , 2016, i-com.

[2]  Enrico Rukzio,et al.  Belt: An Unobtrusive Touch Input Device for Head-worn Displays , 2015, CHI.

[3]  Munkee Choi,et al.  User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value , 2016, Telematics Informatics.

[4]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[5]  Shuhei Hosokawa,et al.  The walkman effect , 1984, Popular Music.

[6]  Vivian Genaro Motti,et al.  Understanding the wearability of head-mounted devices from a human-centered perspective , 2014, SEMWEB.

[7]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Usability - Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation , 1991, Interact. Comput..

[8]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[9]  Marion Koelle,et al.  Don't look at me that way!: Understanding User Attitudes Towards Data Glasses Usage , 2015, MobileHCI.

[10]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology , 2015, Internet Res..

[11]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[12]  Tadayoshi Kohno,et al.  In situ with bystanders of augmented reality glasses: perspectives on recording and privacy-mediating technologies , 2014, CHI.

[13]  P. Mayring Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution , 2014 .

[14]  Philipp A. Rauschnabel,et al.  Augmented reality smart glasses: an investigation of technology acceptance drivers , 2016 .

[15]  N. Selwyn Apart from technology: understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life , 2003 .

[16]  Alexander Brem,et al.  Who will buy smart glasses? Empirical results of two pre-market-entry studies on the role of personality in individual awareness and intended adoption of Google Glass wearables , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Hee-Cheol Kim,et al.  Acceptability Engineering: the Study of user Acceptance of Innovative Technologies , 2015 .

[18]  Hee-Cheol Kim,et al.  Six Human Factors to Acceptability of Wearable Computers , 2013 .

[19]  Alan McQuinn,et al.  The Privacy Panic Cycle: A Guide to Public Fears About New Technologies , 2015 .

[20]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  Supporting Subtlety with Deceptive Devices and Illusory Interactions , 2015, CHI.

[21]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[22]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  Candid Interaction: Revealing Hidden Mobile and Wearable Computing Activities , 2015, UIST.

[23]  Steve Benford,et al.  Designing the spectator experience , 2005, CHI.

[24]  van Km Koert Mensvoort Pyramid of technology : how technology becomes nature in seven steps , 2013 .

[25]  Angela Berkley,et al.  Snapshot Seeing: Kodak Fiends, Child Photographers, and Henry James’s What Maisie Knew , 2015 .