UNDERSTANDING THE EMERGENCE AND DEPLOYMENT OF " NANO " S

As an introduction to the special issue on “emerging nanotechnologies”, this paper puts in perspective contemporary debates and challenges about nanotechnology. It presents an overview of diverse analyses and expectations about this presumably revolutionary set of technological, scientific and industrial developments. Three main lines of argument can then be delineated: first of all, the degree of cumulativeness of science and technologies and the respective roles of newcomers and incumbents in the industrial dynamics; second the knowledge dynamics in nanotechnologies, especially the linkages by science and technology and third the role of institutions (network, geographic agglomeration and job market). It finally discusses methodologies to delineate the field of nanotechnologies and to collect data.

[1]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[2]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Editor's introduction: building and deploying scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[3]  C. Hill,et al.  The Performance of Incumbent firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation , 2003 .

[4]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital , 2005 .

[5]  J. Christensen.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2008 .

[6]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[7]  C. Hamlin,et al.  Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine , 2001 .

[8]  A. Bonaccorsi.  Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science , 2008 .

[9]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Proximity and Innovation , 2001 .

[10]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[11]  R. Kostoff,et al.  The seminal literature of nanotechnology research , 2006 .

[12]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Innovation, Competition, and Industry Structure , 1993 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[14]  Jesse A. Stump,et al.  The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature , 2006 .

[15]  K. Blind.  Explanatory factors for participation in formal standardisation processes: Empirical evidence at firm level , 2006 .

[16]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Grilichesian Breakthroughs: Inventions of Methods of Inventing and Firm Entry in Nanotechnology , 2003 .

[17]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[18]  Julie M. Hite,et al.  The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm , 2001 .

[19]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Responding to Structural Industry Changes: A Technological Evolution Perspective , 1997 .

[20]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[21]  L. Zucker,et al.  Minerva Unbound: Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows and New Knowledge Production , 2006 .

[22]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Turning scientific and technological human capital into economic capital: the experience of biotech start-ups in France , 2004 .

[23]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  The Spatial Clustering of Science and Capital: Accounting for Biotech Firm-Venture Capital Relationships , 2002 .

[24]  Mike Wright,et al.  Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy , 2006 .

[25]  Simcha Jong,et al.  How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry , 2006 .

[26]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance , 2005 .