Social Acceptance Optimization of Biomass Plants: a Fuzzy Cognitive Map and Evolutionary Algorithm Application

Implementation of biomass plants is often thwarted by public opposition, despite potential technicaleconomic and normative feasibility. This opposition is generally known as NIMBY effect. One of the most adopted political action able to overcome or to control NIMBY effect is the information of population about ex-ante and ex-post characteristics of the intervention. However, the informative approach is a complex task to achieve. In this process, several ecological, social, normative and economic variables must be properly considered in a unique framework. Moreover, the selection of variables on which concentrate information and the time consumption of knowledge transfer, seem to be additional issues to solve. Thus, the aim of the research is to implement and verify an innovative procedure to assess and minimize the potential NIMBY effect in case of planning of biomass facilities. From the methodological point of view, this study combines Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) procedure and nonlinear modelling solved by the Social Cognitive Optimisation (SCO) evolutionary algorithm. This work focuses on the perception of experts in bioenergy sector about Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant. The proposed methodology is developed for a theoretical case study in Tuscany (central Italy).

[1]  Marina Bosch,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods And Applications , 2016 .

[2]  D. Horst NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[3]  Wenhui Fan,et al.  A Data-Based Fuzzy Cognitive Map Mining Method Using DE-SQP Algorithm , 2012, AsiaSim.

[4]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Enhancing local distinctiveness fosters public acceptance of tidal energy: A UK case study , 2011 .

[5]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series Why does Renewable Energy diffuse so slowly ? A review of innovation system problems , 2011 .

[6]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  Emma ter Mors,et al.  It's not only about safety: Beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht , 2012 .

[8]  Xiao-Feng Xie,et al.  Social cognitive optimization for nonlinear programming problems , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[9]  Kasper Kok,et al.  The potential of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil , 2009 .

[10]  D. Maggi,et al.  A Benefit /cost Approach for Prioritizing Plant Modifications to Reduce Risk Below Acceptance Limit , 2013 .

[11]  Till Jenssen,et al.  The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Acceptance and Opposition as Keys to Bioenergy Technologies , 2010 .

[12]  Gianluca Nardone,et al.  Modeling the bio-refinery industry in rural areas: A participatory approach for policy options comparison , 2011 .

[13]  Elpiniki I. Papageorgiou,et al.  A new hybrid method using evolutionary algorithms to train Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 2005, Appl. Soft Comput..

[14]  Michael N. Vrahatis,et al.  Evolutionary Computation Techniques for Optimizing Fuzzy Cognitive Maps in Radiation Therapy Systems , 2004, GECCO.

[15]  D. Horst,et al.  National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity plant , 2004 .

[16]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[17]  Elpiniki I. Papageorgiou,et al.  Fuzzy cognitive map based approach for predicting yield in cotton crop production as a basis for decision support system in precision agriculture application , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[18]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Energy sustainable communities : Environmental psychological investigations , 2008 .

[19]  Uygar Özesmi,et al.  Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach , 2004 .

[20]  M. Kaltschmitt,et al.  Energy from biomass—do non-technical barriers prevent an increased use? , 1999 .