After reviewing the relevant theory on chess expertise, this paper re-examines experim entally the finding of Chase and Sim on (1973a) that the differences in ability of chess players at different skill levels to copy and to recall positions are attributable to the experts’ storage of thousands of chunks (patterned clusters of pieces) in long-term memory. Despite important differences in the experimental apparatus, the data of the present experiments regarding latencies and chess relations between successively placed pieces are highly correlated with those of Chase and Simon. W e conclude that the two-second inter-chunk interval used to define chunk boundaries is robust, and that chunks have psychological reality. W e discuss the possible reasons why M asters in our new study used substantially larger chunks than the M aster of the 1973 study, and extend the chunking theory to take account of the evidence for large retrieval structures (templates) in long-term memory.
[1]
Paul J. Feltovich,et al.
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices
,
1981,
Cogn. Sci..
[2]
Hans Gruber,et al.
Expertise and hierarchical knowledge representation in chess
,
1992
.
[3]
H. Simon,et al.
Perception in chess
,
1973
.
[4]
H. Simon,et al.
Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions is a function of skill
,
1996,
Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[5]
D. Holding.
The Psychology of Chess Skill
,
1985
.
[6]
E. Tulving.
Subjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words.
,
1962,
Psychological review.
[7]
Pertti Saariluoma,et al.
Location Coding in Chess
,
1994
.