On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages

Abstract In signed languages, the arguments of verbs can be marked by a system of verbal modification that has been termed “agreement” (more neutrally, “directionality”). Fundamental issues regarding directionality remain unresolved and the phenomenon has characteristics that call into question its analysis as agreement. We conclude that directionality marks person in American Sign Language, and the ways person marking interacts with syntactic phenomena are largely analogous to morpho-syntactic properties of familiar agreement systems. Overall, signed languages provide a crucial test for how gestural and linguistic mechanisms can jointly contribute to the satisfaction of fundamental aspects of linguistic structure.

[1]  Diane Lillo-Martin,et al.  Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages: Where are all the modality effects? , 2002 .

[2]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types , 2005 .

[3]  A. Kendon.  Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance , 2004 .

[4]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Donkey anaphora: the view from sign language (ASL and LSF) , 2011 .

[5]  Paul Forchheimer.  The category of person in language , 1953 .

[6]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Pronominal system in Croatian Sign Language , 2006 .

[7]  D. MacLaughlin.  The structure of determiner phrases : evidence from American sign language , 1997 .

[8]  Carol Padden,et al.  The ASL lexicon , 1998 .

[9]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology , 1981 .

[10]  Susan D. Fischer,et al.  The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language , 1996 .

[11]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[12]  Irit Meir,et al.  Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language , 1999 .

[13]  E. Klima.  The signs of language , 1979 .

[14]  Irit Meir,et al.  Body as subject1 , 2007, Journal of Linguistics.

[15]  Kearsy Cormier,et al.  Locus agreement in American Sign Language , 1999 .

[16]  Richard Lacy.  Review article:Putting some of the syntax back into semantics , 2003 .

[17]  K Cormier.  Pronouns and pointing: Where do sign languages fit in? , 2010 .

[18]  Brenda M Farnell,et al.  Do You See What I Mean?: Plains Indian Sign Talk and the Embodiment of Action , 1995 .

[19]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[20]  Charlotte Lee Baker-Shenk,et al.  American Sign Language : A Teacher's Resource Text on Grammar and Culture , 1991 .

[21]  P. Siple,et al.  Theoretical issues in sign language research , 1990 .

[22]  Josep Quer,et al.  Back to back(wards) and moving on: on agreement, auxiliaries and verb classes in sign languages , 2008 .

[23]  Michael Cysouw.  What it means to be rare : the case of person marking , 2005 .

[24]  Richard P. Meier,et al.  The acquisition of verb agreement: Pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages , 2002 .

[25]  William C. Stokoe.  Space in Danish Sign Language by Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (review) , 1994 .

[26]  Charlotte Baker.  American Sign Language: A Teacher's Resource Text on Grammar and Culture , 1980 .

[27]  J. Shepard-Kegl.  Pronominalization in American Sign Language , 2003 .

[28]  Bonnie Gough,et al.  Verbs in American Sign Language , 2013 .

[29]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Sign Language Research at the Millennium , 2000 .

[30]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[31]  S. Berk.  Sensitive period effects on the acquisition of language: A study of language development , 2003 .

[32]  J. Kegl.  Review article:Pronominalization in American Sign Language , 2003 .

[33]  Gaurav Mathur,et al.  Sign Languages: Verb agreement in sign language morphology , 2010 .

[34]  Victoria Nyst,et al.  24. Shared sign languages , 2012 .

[35]  Diane C. Lillo-Martin,et al.  Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language , 1986 .

[36]  William Washabaugh.  Five Fingers For Survival , 1986 .

[37]  C. A. Ferguson,et al.  Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions , 1990 .

[38]  K. Cormier.  Do all pronouns point? Indexicality of first person plural pronouns in BSL and ASL , 2007 .

[39]  R. P. Meier,et al.  Icons, analogues, and morphemes : the acquisition of verb agreement in American sign language , 1983 .

[40]  Irit Meir,et al.  Morphological universals and the sign language type , 2005 .

[41]  Diane C. Lillo-Martin,et al.  Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the Null Argument Parameters , 1991 .

[42]  Carol Neidle,et al.  The Licensing of Null Arguments in American Sign Language , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[43]  Ann Senghas,et al.  Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language , 2003 .

[44]  Marie Coppola,et al.  To appear in Sign Languages : A Cambridge Language Survey , 2009 .

[45]  Carol Neidle,et al.  The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure , 1999 .

[46]  Susan Lioyd McBurney,et al.  Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages: Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent? , 2002 .

[47]  Scott K. Liddell.  Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language , 2003 .

[48]  Norine Berenz.  Insights into person deixis , 2002 .

[49]  R. Pfau,et al.  Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages , 2006 .

[50]  小泉 保,et al.  COMRIE,Bernard:Language Universals and Linguistic Typology,Syntax and Morphology,1989 , 1983 .

[51]  Scott K. Liddell.  THINK AND BELIEVE: SEQUENTIALITY IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1984 .

[52]  M. Aronoff,et al.  The Paradox of Sign Language Morphology , 2005, Language.