Economic Action Does Not Take Place in a Vacuum: Understanding Cisco's Acquisition and Development Strategy

The literature and common belief holds that the acquisition of high- technology firms in rapidly evolving markets normally results in failure. Cisco, however, has successfully grown through the conscious and deliberate use of acquisitions to become the dominant global networking equipment provider. The crux of our argument is that Cisco's success cannot be fully explained by economic and financial variables, or by acquisition target selection, alone. Managing social and organizational processes has been central to Cisco's success. Cisco's success is attributed to an active involvement by both the firm and its employees in its ecosystem. We explain the operation of Cisco's multiplex intelligence gathering function, and characterize it as a "high surface area strategy". This is followed by highlighting how Cisco's due diligence process treats human resource issues as central to calculating the true value of the acquisition. Whereas, most firms consider the process as complete when the decision to acquire has been made, this study explains how Cisco's integration process is staged to ensure that the core product development teams in the acquired firm suffer minimal disruption. Finally, Cisco's success is measured through the use of retention and market share data.

[1]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers , 2004 .

[2]  The Triumph of Ethernet , 2002 .

[3]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation , 2013 .

[4]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Cross-Border Acquisitions of U.S. Technology Assets , 2000 .

[5]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Integrating Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquisitions: a Case Study of Synergy Realization , 1999 .

[6]  M. Zollo,et al.  POST-ACQUISITION STRATEGIES , INTEGRATION CAPABILITY , AND THE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS By , 1999 .

[7]  Ronald J. Gilson,et al.  The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete , 1998 .

[8]  B Freydberg Nothing but net? , 1997, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[9]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[10]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Asset redeployment, acquisitions and corporate strategy in declining industries , 1997 .

[11]  Mathew L. A. Hayward,et al.  Explaining the Premiums Paid for Large Acquisitions: Evidence of CEO Hubris , 1997 .

[12]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[13]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[14]  K. Green National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[15]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  The Friendly and Predatory Acquisition of Large U.S. Corporations in the 1960s: The Other Contested Terrain , 1995 .

[16]  H. Bahrami,et al.  Flexible Re-Cycling and High-Technology Entrepreneurship , 1995 .

[17]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  National Systems of Innovation : Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 2012 .

[18]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Relative Standing: A Framework for Understanding Departures of Acquired Executives , 1993 .

[19]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Effects of executive departures on the performance of acquired firms , 1993 .

[20]  R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[21]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[22]  Deepak K. Datta Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration , 1991 .

[23]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[24]  A. Seth Value creation in acquisitions: A re‐examination of performance issues , 1990 .

[25]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  FROM THE TRANSFORMATION OF CORPORATE CONTROL , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[26]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[27]  F. Scherer,et al.  The profitability of mergers , 1989 .

[28]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[29]  Ali R. Malekzadeh,et al.  Acculturation in Mergers and Acquisitions , 1988 .

[30]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Corporate Acquisitions: A Process Perspective , 1986 .

[32]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  P. David Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[34]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Takeovers: Folklore and Science , 2002 .

[35]  D. Hambrick Environmental scanning and organizational strategy , 1982 .

[36]  M. Jones,et al.  The tape-recorded interview , 1980 .

[37]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[38]  P. Jenny,et al.  Senior Vice President , 1977 .

[39]  C. F. Phillips Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[40]  F. Aguilar Scanning the business environment , 1967 .

[41]  G. William Domhoff,et al.  Who Rules America? , 2021 .