Multi-system intervention optimization for interdependent infrastructure

Abstract The wellbeing of modern societies is dependent upon the functioning of their infrastructure networks. This paper introduces the 3C concept, an integrative multi-system and multi-stakeholder optimization approach for managing infrastructure interventions (e.g., maintenance, renovation, etc.). The proposed approach takes advantage of the benefits achieved by grouping (i.e., optimizing) intervention activities. Intervention optimization leads to substantial savings on both direct intervention costs (operator) and indirect unavailability costs (society) by reducing the number of system interruptions. The proposed optimization approach is formalized into a structured mathematical model that can account for the interactions between multiple infrastructure networks and the impact on multiple stakeholders (e.g., society and infrastructure operators), and it can accommodate different types of intervention, such as maintenance, removal, and upgrading. The different types of interdependencies, within and across infrastructures, are modeled using a proposed interaction matrix (IM). The IM allows integrating the interventions of different infrastructure networks whose interventions are normally planned independently. Moreover, the introduced 3C concept accounts for central interventions, which are those that must occur at a pre-established time moment, where neither delay nor advance is permitted. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach, an illustrative example of a multi-system and multi-actor intervention planning is introduced. Results show a substantial reduction in the operator and societal costs. In addition, the optimal intervention program obtained in the analysis shows no predictable patterns, which indicates it is a useful managerial decision support tool.

[1]  Aditya Parida,et al.  Measuring and monitoring operational availability of rail infrastructure , 2016 .

[2]  Phuc Do,et al.  Maintenance grouping strategy for multi-component systems with dynamic contexts , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Gian Paolo Cimellaro,et al.  Deterministic and fuzzy-based methods to evaluate community resilience , 2018, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[4]  J. Andrews,et al.  Optimising strategy selection for the management of railway assets , 2017 .

[5]  David J. Edwards,et al.  Predicting downtime costs of tracked hydraulic excavators operating in the UK opencast mining industry , 2002 .

[6]  Claudio Martani,et al.  Estimating and communicating the risk of neglecting maintenance , 2019, Infrastructure Asset Management.

[7]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  A Network Flow Model Approach to Determining Optimal Intervention Programs for Railway Infrastructure Networks , 2018, Infrastructures.

[8]  B. Adey,et al.  Defining and quantifying railway service to plan infrastructure interventions , 2020 .

[9]  R. Ackoff Ackoff's Best: His Classic Writings on Management , 1999 .

[10]  K. Deb An Efficient Constraint Handling Method for Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[11]  Soliman Abu-Samra,et al.  Resilient storm pipes: a multi-stage decision support system , 2020, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering.

[12]  W.M.J. Geraerds The cost of downtime for maintenance : preliminary considerations , 1984 .

[13]  Gian Paolo Cimellaro,et al.  Resilience of the Built Environment: A Methodology to Estimate the Downtime of Building Structures Using Fuzzy Logic , 2019, Resilient Structures and Infrastructure.

[14]  Peter Muchiri,et al.  Maintenance optimization models and criteria , 2010, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[15]  B. Adey,et al.  Optimal Intervention Planning: A Bottom-Up Approach to Renewing Aging Water Infrastructure , 2020 .

[16]  L. Amador,et al.  Asset Management Framework for Integrated Municipal Infrastructure , 2020 .

[17]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  Determining optimal intervention programs for large railway infrastructure networks using a genetic algorithm , 2019 .

[18]  Jørn Vatn,et al.  Role of grouping in the development of an overall maintenance optimization framework for offshore wind turbines , 2012 .

[19]  Gian Paolo Cimellaro,et al.  PEOPLES: A Tool to Measure Community Resilience , 2018 .

[20]  Kusum Deep,et al.  A real coded genetic algorithm for solving integer and mixed integer optimization problems , 2009, Appl. Math. Comput..

[21]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  Determination of Risk-Reducing Intervention Programs for Railway Lines and the Significance of Simplifications , 2018 .

[22]  B. Adey,et al.  Usefulness of quantifying effects on rail service when comparing intervention strategies , 2020 .

[23]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Maintenance and Operation of Infrastructure Systems: Review , 2016 .

[24]  P. Baraldi,et al.  A Modeling Framework for Maintenance Optimization of Electrical Components Based on Fuzzy Logic and Effective Age , 2013, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[25]  Hans Peter Lindenmann,et al.  Algorithm for the Planning of Optimum Highway Work Zones , 2007 .

[26]  Phuc Do,et al.  A Study on the Impacts of Maintenance Duration on Dynamic Grouping Modeling and Optimization of Multicomponent Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[27]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[28]  Anne Barros,et al.  Maintenance grouping models for multicomponent systems , 2017 .

[30]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  Modelling the Complex Relationship between Interventions, Interventions Costs and the Service Provided When Evaluating Intervention Programs on Railway Infrastructure Networks , 2020, Infrastructures.

[31]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Optimal planning of retrofitting interventions on bridges in a highway network , 1998 .

[32]  Nam Lethanh,et al.  Investigation of a static and a dynamic neighbourhood methodology to develop work programs for multiple close municipal infrastructure networks , 2017 .

[33]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  Reliability‐Based Optimization Models for Scheduling Pavement Rehabilitation , 2010, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[34]  Bryan T. Adey,et al.  Determination of intervention programs for multiple municipal infrastructure networks: considering network operator and service costs , 2020 .

[35]  Christophe Bérenguer,et al.  Dynamic Grouping Maintenance for Complex Structure Systems with Non-Negligible Replacement Time , 2012 .

[36]  Christophe Bérenguer,et al.  Dynamic grouping maintenance with time limited opportunities , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[37]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  PROMPT, A Decision Support System for Opportunity-Based Preventive Maintenance , 1996 .

[38]  A. H. Christer,et al.  Delay Time Models of Industrial Inspection Maintenance Problems , 1984 .

[39]  Peiyuan Lin,et al.  Integrative modeling of performance deterioration and maintenance effectiveness for infrastructure assets with missing condition data , 2019, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[41]  YuanXian-Xun Principles and guidelines of deterioration modelling for water and waste water assets , 2017 .

[42]  J. Hershey Computation , 1991, Digit. Signal Process..

[43]  Vittorio Di Federico,et al.  Optimal Scheduling of Replacement and Rehabilitation in Wastewater Pipeline Networks , 2010 .

[44]  Massimo Losa,et al.  Optimization of maintenance strategies for railway track-bed considering probabilistic degradation models and different reliability levels , 2021, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[45]  Marvin Zelen,et al.  Mathematical Theory of Reliability , 1965 .

[46]  Luís C. Neves,et al.  A degradation and maintenance model: application to portuguese context , 2014 .