In this article, I identify four types of participatory policy analysis (PPA) that have been proposed to address two alleged failures of traditional policy analysis: that it is antidemocratic and that its positivist framework creates a mistaken view of the analytic task. Then I present a case study of one type of PPA that has received little research attention, organization-stakeholder policy analysis. In the case, I describe how the Georgia Division of Rehabilitation Services used an 11-member policy analysis team, all employees of the organization, to analyze its order of selection policy and present advice to its executive committee. Following the case description, I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of this type of PPA and suggest that it should be viewed as a “method of the second type” that may be well suited for addressing some messy or ill-structured policy issues.
[1]
William N. Dunn,et al.
METHODS OF THE SECOND TYPE: COPING WITH THE WILDERNESS OF CONVENTIONAL POLICY ANALYSIS
,
1988
.
[2]
Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.
Communication of results and utilization in participatory program evaluation
,
1988
.
[3]
Toby Diane Ayers,et al.
Stakeholders as partners in evaluation: A stakeholder-collaborative approach☆☆☆
,
1987
.
[4]
E. Guba.
What Can Happen As A Result Of A Policy
,
1985
.
[5]
H. Jenkins-Smith,et al.
Rescuing policy analysis from the civil service
,
1985
.
[6]
John E. S. Lawrence,et al.
Designing program evaluations with the help of stakeholders
,
1982
.