A Haptic Knob for Rehabilitation of Hand Function

This paper describes a novel two-degree-of-freedom robotic interface to train opening/closing of the hand and knob manipulation. The mechanical design, based on two parallelogram structures holding an exchangeable button, offers the possibility to adapt the interface to various hand sizes and finger orientations, as well as to right-handed or left-handed subjects. The interaction with the subject is measured by means of position encoders and four force sensors located close to the output measuring grasping and insertion forces. Various knobs can be mounted on the interface, including a cone mechanism to train a complete opening movement from a strongly contracted and closed hand to a large opened position. We describe the design based on measured biomechanics, the redundant safety mechanisms as well as the actuation and control architecture. Preliminary experiments show the performance of this interface and some of the possibilities it offers for the rehabilitation of hand function.

[1]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A Haptic Knob for Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  W. Rymer,et al.  Impairment of voluntary control of finger motion following stroke: Role of inappropriate muscle coactivation , 2001, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  S. Hesse,et al.  Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  H.I. Krebs,et al.  Whole-Arm Rehabilitation Following Stroke: Hand Module , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[5]  Michael Recce,et al.  A virtual reality based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke: transfer to function , 2004, EMBC 2004.

[6]  H. Kawsaki,et al.  Hand rehabilitation support system based on self-motion-control , 2004, IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. TExCRA Technical Exhibition Based..

[7]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin - robot for rehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[8]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[9]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A 2-DOF fMRI Compatible Haptic Interface to Interact with Arm Movements , 2006 .

[10]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Xun Luo,et al.  Integration of Augmented Reality and Assistive Devices for Post-Stroke Hand Opening Rehabilitation , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[12]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A 2-DOF fMRI compatible haptic interface to investigate the neural control of arm movements , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[13]  T. Kline,et al.  Control system for pneumatically controlled glove to assist in grasp activities , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[14]  H. Woldag,et al.  Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients , 2002, Journal of Neurology.

[15]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2005, Stroke.

[16]  R. Johansson,et al.  Development of human precision grip I: Basic coordination of force , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  N. Hogan,et al.  Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  Niels Smaby,et al.  Identification of key pinch forces required to complete functional tasks. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[20]  J. Hidler,et al.  Advances in the Understanding and Treatment of Stroke Impairment Using Robotic Devices , 2005, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[21]  R. Riener,et al.  ARMin - design of a novel arm rehabilitation robot , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[22]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  The Rutgers Master II-new design force-feedback glove , 2002 .

[23]  S.C. Cramer,et al.  A robotic device for hand motor therapy after stroke , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..