An evaluation of methods for single-trial estimation of P3 latency.

This study investigated the validity of procedures for estimating the P3 complex in single trials. In "pseudo-real" simulations of the N1-P2 complex of the occipital visual-evoked potential, Möcks, Köhler, Gasser, and Pham (1988) had reported that their maximum-likelihood method (Pham, Möcks, Köhler, & Gasser, 1987) performed better than Woody's (1967) method. Using pseudo-real simulations of auditory oddball data, we wanted to know whether this finding also held true for the P3 complex. The performance of three methods was studied: peak picking, Woody's method, and Pham et al.'s method (as well as an extension of this latter method). Performance of all methods critically depended on the signal-to-noise ratio. There was some advantage for the more sophisticated methods, particularly when signal-to-noise ratios were realistic. "Good" trials may be selected by all methods, to improve the signal-to-noise ratio, but this selection entails the risk of bias. Further research should investigate whether these conclusions also hold true when the P3 complex consists of more than one component.

[1]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  Theory of Statistical Estimation , 1925, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  N. Squires,et al.  The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. , 1976, Science.

[3]  E. Donchin,et al.  COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY: THE ENDOGENOUS COMPONENTS OF THE ERP , 1978 .

[4]  R Verleger,et al.  SELAVCO: a method to deal with trial-to-trial variability of evoked potentials. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  Manipulation of P3 latency: speed vs. accuracy instructions. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. I. Normal aging. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  J Möcks,et al.  Variability of single visual evoked potentials evaluated by two new statistical tests. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  Apparent response incompatibility effects on P3 latency depend on the task. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  D K Prasher,et al.  Latency variability and temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potentials (N1, P2, N2, and P3) in normal subjects. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Sequential effects on P3 in a counting task: A partial replication , 1987, Biological Psychology.

[11]  T. Gasser,et al.  Variable latencies of noisy signals: Estimation and testing in brain potential data , 1987 .

[12]  J Möcks,et al.  Novel approaches to the problem of latency jitter. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[13]  G Fein,et al.  P300 latency variability in normal elderly: effects of paradigm and measurement technique. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  A F Kramer,et al.  Simulation studies of latency measures of components of the event-related brain potential. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[15]  J Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. I. Simple and choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  W. Sommer,et al.  Differential effects of voluntary expectancies on reaction times and event-related potentials: evidence for automatic and controlled expectancies. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  A Puce,et al.  P3 latency jitter assessed using 2 techniques. I. Simulated data and surface recordings in normal subjects. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  A Puce,et al.  P3 latency jitter assessed using 2 techniques. II. Surface and sphenoidal recordings in subjects with focal epilepsy. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Ford,et al.  Schizophrenics have fewer and smaller P300s: A single-trial analysis , 1994, Biological Psychiatry.

[20]  J Anderson,et al.  Classification of single-trial ERP sub-types: application of globally optimal vector quantization using simulated annealing. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  S. Segalowitz,et al.  Sources of P300 attenuation after head injury: single-trial amplitude, latency jitter, and EEG power. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[22]  Claude Tomberg,et al.  New application of the Z estimator to identify the cognitive P300 in non-averaged human brain potentials , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  D. H. Lange,et al.  Modeling and estimation of single evoked brain potential components , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  R Verleger,et al.  Event-related potentials suggest slowing of brain processes in generalized epilepsy and alterations of visual processing in patients with partial seizures. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  R. Verleger.  On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[26]  T. Demiralp,et al.  Time–frequency analysis reveals multiple functional components during oddball P300 , 1997, Neuroreport.

[27]  E. Basar,et al.  Detection of P300 Waves in Single Trials by the Wavelet Transform (WT) , 1999, Brain and Language.