Proceedings of the Workshop on Question Answering for Complex Domains

Simple questions require small snippets of text as the answers whereas complex questions require inferencing and synthesizing information from multiple documents to have multiple sentences as the answers. The traditional QA systems can handle simple questions easily but complex questions often need more sophisticated treatment e.g. question decomposition. Therefore, it is necessary to automatically classify an input question as simple or complex to treat them accordingly. We apply two machine learning techniques and a Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) based method to automatically classify the questions as simple or complex.

[1]  Kristiina Jokinen,et al.  Multimodal Open-Domain Conversations with the Nao Robot , 2012, Natural Interaction with Robots, Knowbots and Smartphones, Putting Spoken Dialog Systems into Practice.

[2]  Eric H. Nyberg,et al.  Improving Text Retrieval Precision and Answer Accuracy in Question Answering Systems , 2008, COLING 2008.

[3]  Sadaoki Furui,et al.  Monolingual Web-based Factoid Question Answering in Chinese, Swedish, English and Japanese , 2006 .

[4]  Emer Gilmartin,et al.  Multimodal conversational interaction with a humanoid robot , 2012, 2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom).

[5]  Paolo Rosso,et al.  Mining Knowledge fromWikipedia for the Question Answering task , 2006, LREC.

[6]  Zhen-ming Yuan,et al.  A Web-Based Examination and Evaluation System for Computer Education , 2006 .

[7]  Idan Szpektor,et al.  Learning from the past: answering new questions with past answers , 2012, WWW.

[8]  Kristiina Jokinen,et al.  Constructive Dialogue Modelling - Speech Interaction and Rational Agents , 2009, Wiley series in agent technology.

[9]  Ellen M Voorhees Question answering in TREC , 2001, CIKM '01.

[10]  Joseph Weizenbaum,et al.  and Machine , 1977 .

[11]  Alexander Franz,et al.  Searching the Web by Voice , 2002, COLING.

[12]  Roberto Basili,et al.  RTV: Tree Kernels for Thematic Role Classification , 2007, SemEval@ACL.

[13]  James H. Martin,et al.  Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing , 2000 .

[14]  Noriko Kando,et al.  WoZ Simulation of Interactive Question Answering , 2006, HLT-NAACL 2006.

[15]  Kristiina Jokinen,et al.  Emergent verbal behaviour in human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom).

[16]  Junlan Feng,et al.  A Data Driven Approach to Relevancy Recognition for Contextual Question Answering , 2006, HLT-NAACL 2006.

[17]  Zhiping Zheng,et al.  AnswerBus question answering system , 2002 .

[18]  Kathleen F. McCoy,et al.  Focus of attention: Constraining what can be said next , 1991 .

[19]  Olivier Galibert,et al.  Integrating spoken dialog and question answering: the ritel project , 2006, INTERSPEECH.

[20]  Sven Hartrumpf Adapting a Semantic Question Answering System to the Web , 2006 .

[21]  Minsu Jang,et al.  Automated Question Answering Using Semantic Web Services , 2007, The 2nd IEEE Asia-Pacific Service Computing Conference (APSCC 2007).

[22]  Raffaella Bernardi,et al.  Exploring Topic Continuation Follow-up Questions using Machine Learning , 2009, HLT-NAACL.

[23]  Ellen M. Voorhees,et al.  Evaluating the Evaluation: A Case Study Using the TREC 2002 Question Answering Track , 2003, NAACL.

[24]  Dimitra Anastasiou,et al.  Evaluation of WikiTalk - User Studies of Human-Robot Interaction , 2013, HCI.

[25]  Günter Neumann,et al.  Cross-Cutting Aspects of Cross-Language Question Answering Systems , 2006 .

[26]  Kristiina Jokinen,et al.  Constructive Interaction for Talking about Interesting Topics , 2012, LREC.

[27]  Hideki Tanaka,et al.  Context Management with Topics for Spoken Dialogue Systems , 1998, COLING-ACL.

[28]  Von-Wun Soo,et al.  An Empirical Study on Thematic Knowledge Acquisition Based on Syntactic Clues and Heuristics , 1993, ACL.

[29]  Rivindu Perera Scholar: Cognitive Computing Approach for Question Answering , 2012 .