Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation.

The operation of the mammalian cochlea relies on a mechanical traveling wave that is actively boosted by electromechanical forces in sensory outer hair cells (OHCs). This active cochlear amplifier produces the impressive sensitivity and frequency resolution of mammalian hearing. The cochlear amplifier has inspired scientists since its discovery in the 1970s, and is still not well understood. To explore cochlear electromechanics at the sensory cell/tissue interface, sound-evoked intracochlear pressure and extracellular voltage were measured using a recently developed dual-sensor with a microelectrode attached to a micro-pressure sensor. The resulting coincident in vivo observations of OHC electrical activity, pressure at the basilar membrane and basilar membrane displacement gave direct evidence for power amplification in the cochlea. Moreover, the results showed a phase shift of voltage relative to mechanical responses at frequencies slightly below the peak, near the onset of amplification. Based on the voltage-force relationship of isolated OHCs, the shift would give rise to effective OHC pumping forces within the traveling wave peak. Thus, the shift activates the cochlear amplifier, serving to localize and thus sharpen the frequency region of amplification. These results are the most concrete evidence for cochlear power amplification to date and support OHC somatic forces as its source.

[1]  D. M. Freeman,et al.  Longitudinally propagating traveling waves of the mammalian tectorial membrane , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  T. Ren Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Acoustic enhancement of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: a model , 1995, Hearing Research.

[4]  Sunil Puria,et al.  Feed-forward and feed-backward amplification model from cochlear cytoarchitecture: an interspecies comparison. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Tobias Reichenbach,et al.  The Spatial Pattern of Cochlear Amplification , 2012, Neuron.

[6]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Allen,et al.  Cochlear micromechanics--a physical model of transduction. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P Dallos,et al.  Production of cochlear potentials by inner and outer hair cells. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A. Hubbard,et al.  A traveling-wave amplifier model of the cochlea. , 1993, Science.

[10]  Elizabeth S. Olson,et al.  Von Békésy and cochlear mechanics , 2012, Hearing Research.

[11]  E S Olson,et al.  Intracochlear pressure measurements related to cochlear tuning. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  E. Olson,et al.  Supporting evidence for reverse cochlear traveling waves. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  E. Olson,et al.  Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Steven L. Jacques,et al.  A differentially amplified motion in the ear for near-threshold sound detection , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Neely,et al.  A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  P. Avan,et al.  Stereocilin-deficient mice reveal the origin of cochlear waveform distortions , 2008, Nature.

[17]  R. Patuzzi,et al.  A model of the generation of the cochlear microphonic with nonlinear hair cell transduction and nonlinear basilar membrane mechanics , 1987, Hearing Research.

[18]  Robert Fettiplace,et al.  Prestin-Driven Cochlear Amplification Is Not Limited by the Outer Hair Cell Membrane Time Constant , 2011, Neuron.

[19]  K. Iwasa,et al.  Force generation in the outer hair cell of the cochlea. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Ning Hu,et al.  Organ of Corti Potentials and the Motion of the Basilar Membrane , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Marcus Müller The cochlear place-frequency map of the adult and developing mongolian gerbil , 1996, Hearing Research.

[22]  Wei Dong,et al.  In vivo impedance of the gerbil cochlear partition at auditory frequencies. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[23]  W Hemmert,et al.  Limiting dynamics of high-frequency electromechanical transduction of outer hair cells. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  P Dallos,et al.  High-frequency motility of outer hair cells and the cochlear amplifier. , 1995, Science.

[25]  N. Kiang,et al.  Tails of tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  G. Richardson,et al.  Mechano-electrical transducer currents in hair cells of the cultured neonatal mouse cochlea , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  E. J. Kletsky,et al.  CM tuning can be compatible with sharply tuned receptor potentials , 1980, Hearing Research.

[28]  E. de Boer,et al.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. II. From data to models--and back. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Paul J Kolston The importance of phase data and model dimensionality to cochlear mechanics , 2000, Hearing Research.

[30]  H. Davis,et al.  A model for transducer action in the cochlea. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[31]  S. Neely,et al.  Distortion product emissions from a cochlear model with nonlinear mechanoelectrical transduction in outer hair cells. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  Tectorial membrane: a possible effect on frequency analysis in the cochlea. , 1979, Science.

[33]  G. Zweig,et al.  Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  T. F. Weiss,et al.  Receptor potentials of lizard hair cells with free‐standing stereocilia: responses to acoustic clicks. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  C. Shera,et al.  Intensity-invariance of fine time structure in basilar-membrane click responses: implications for cochlear mechanics. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Peter Dallos,et al.  Using the Cochlear Microphonic as a Tool to Evaluate Cochlear Function in Mouse Models of Hearing , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[38]  Steven L. Jacques,et al.  In Vivo Outer Hair Cell Length Changes Expose the Active Process in the Cochlea , 2012, PloS one.

[39]  E. de Boer,et al.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Elizabeth S. Olson,et al.  Direct measurement of intra-cochlear pressure waves , 1999, Nature.

[41]  B. P. Bogert,et al.  A Dynamical Theory of the Cochlea , 1950 .

[42]  W Hemmert,et al.  Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: its crucial role in frequency tuning. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Localized cochlear microphonics recorded from the spiral lamina. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.