Cable-Driven Jamming of a Boundary Constrained Soft Robot

Soft robots employ flexible and compliant materials to perform adaptive tasks and navigate uncertain environments. However, soft robots are often unable to achieve forces and precision on the order of rigid-bodied robots. In this paper, we propose a new class of mobile soft robots that can reversibly transition between compliant and stiff states without reconfiguration. The robot can passively conform or actively control its shape, stiffen in its current configuration to function as a rigid-bodied robot, then return to its flexible form. The robotic structure consists of passive granular material surrounded by an active membrane. The membrane is composed of interconnected robotic sub-units that can control the packing density of the granular material and exploit jamming behaviors by varying the length of the interconnecting cables. Each robotic sub-unit uses a differential drive system to achieve locomotion and self-reconfigurability. We present the robot design and perform a set of locomotion and object manipulation experiments to characterize the robot’s performance in soft and rigid states. We also introduce a simulation framework in which we model the jamming soft robot design and study the scalability of this class of robots. The proposed concept demonstrates the properties of both soft and rigid robots, and has the potential to bridge the gap between the two.

[1]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[2]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth , 2017, Science Robotics.

[3]  Jamie Kyujin Paik,et al.  Variable stiffness fabrics with embedded shape memory materials for wearable applications , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  M. van Hecke,et al.  Jamming of soft particles: geometry, mechanics, scaling and isostaticity , 2009, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[5]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Control Strategies for Soft Robotic Manipulators: A Survey. , 2018, Soft robotics.

[7]  T. Nanayakkara,et al.  Soft Robotics Technologies to Address Shortcomings in Today ’ s Minimally Invasive Surgery : The STIFF-FLOP Approach , 2014 .

[8]  Edwin Olson,et al.  AprilTag 2: Efficient and robust fiducial detection , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[9]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[10]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Helical Kirigami-Enabled Centimeter-Scale Worm Robot With Shape-Memory-Alloy Linear Actuators , 2015 .

[11]  Hammad Mazhar,et al.  Chrono: An Open Source Multi-physics Dynamics Engine , 2015, HPCSE.

[12]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Soft Robot Arm Inspired by the Octopus , 2012, Adv. Robotics.

[13]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Jamming as an enabling technology for soft robotics , 2010, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[14]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  A Positive Pressure Universal Gripper Based on the Jamming of Granular Material , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[15]  F. Radjai,et al.  Modeling soft granular materials , 2017 .

[16]  LipsonHod,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Design, Simulation, and Fabrication of Soft Robots , 2014 .

[17]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Robotic metamorphosis by origami exoskeletons , 2017, Science Robotics.

[18]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Soft Manipulators and Grippers: A Review , 2016, Front. Robot. AI.

[19]  CianchettiMatteo,et al.  Soft Robotics Technologies to Address Shortcomings in Today's Minimally Invasive Surgery: The STIFF-FLOP Approach , 2014 .

[20]  Friedrich Pfeiffer,et al.  Multibody Dynamics with Unilateral Contacts , 1996 .

[21]  Michelle C. Yuen,et al.  OmniSkins: Robotic skins that turn inanimate objects into multifunctional robots , 2018, Science Robotics.

[22]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Soft Robotics: Challenges and Perspectives , 2011, FET.

[23]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Jérémie Dequidt,et al.  Software toolkit for modeling, simulation, and control of soft robots , 2017, Adv. Robotics.

[25]  Wang Tianmiao,et al.  A variable stiffness soft robotic gripper with low-melting-point alloy , 2017, 2017 36th Chinese Control Conference (CCC).