Disambiguating the “guilty look”: Salient prompts to a familiar dog behaviour

Anthropomorphisms are regularly used by owners in describing their dogs. Of interest is whether attributions of understanding and emotions to dogs are sound, or are unwarranted applications of human psychological terms to non-humans. One attribution commonly made to dogs is that the "guilty look" shows that dogs feel guilt at doing a disallowed action. In the current study, this anthropomorphism is empirically tested. The behaviours of 14 domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) were videotaped over a series of trials and analyzed for elements that correspond to an owner-identified "guilty look." Trials varied the opportunity for dogs to disobey an owner's command not to eat a desirable treat while the owner was out of the room, and varied the owners' knowledge of what their dogs did in their absence. The results revealed no difference in behaviours associated with the guilty look. By contrast, more such behaviours were seen in trials when owners scolded their dogs. The effect of scolding was more pronounced when the dogs were obedient, not disobedient. These results indicate that a better description of the so-called guilty look is that it is a response to owner cues, rather than that it shows an appreciation of a misdeed.

[1]  Theoretical note on the moral development of rats (Rattus norvegicus). , 1989 .

[2]  P. Ekman.  Are there basic emotions? , 1992, Psychological review.

[3]  V. Csányi,et al.  A nonverbal test of knowledge attribution: a comparative study on dogs and children , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[4]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris) Use Human and Conspecific Social Cues to Locate Hidden Food , 1999 .

[5]  C. Wynne.  What are animals? Why anthropomorphism is still not a scientific approach to behavior , 2006 .

[6]  Steven R. Lindsay.  Handbook of Applied Dog Behavior and Training, Volume Three , 2000 .

[7]  F. Waal,et al.  Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals , 1996 .

[8]  Vicki Hearne,et al.  Adam's Task: Calling Animals by Name , 1986 .

[9]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  G. Thines,et al.  Behavioural processes , 1976, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Owner's beliefs on the ability of their pet dogs to understand human verbal communication: A case of social understanding , 2001 .

[12]  Steven R. Lindsay.  Handbook of Applied Dog Behavior and Training, Vol. 1: Adaptation and Learning , 2000 .

[13]  K. Lorenz,et al.  Man Meets Dog , 1950 .

[14]  Ádám Miklósi,et al.  Dog-Human Relationship Affects Problem Solving Behavior in the Dog , 1997 .

[15]  M. Hauser.  Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think , 2000 .

[16]  M. Bekoff,et al.  Naturalizing Anthropomorphism: Behavioral Prompts to Our Humanizing of Animals , 2007 .

[17]  C. Sanders.  UNDERSTANDING DOGS , 1993 .

[18]  John H. Lumsden.  Handbook of Applied Dog Behavior and Training, Vol. 1: Adaptation and Learning , 2001 .

[19]  S. Paradiso,et al.  Book Review: Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions , 2000 .

[20]  A. Bryan.  The Essential Morphological Basis for Human Culture , 1963, Current Anthropology.

[21]  V. Voith,et al.  Readings in Companion Animal Behavior , 1996 .

[22]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[23]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  C. Darwin.  The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals , .

[25]  D. Freedman.  Constitutional and environmental interactions in rearing of four breeds of dogs. , 1958, Science.

[26]  P. Morris,et al.  Secondary emotions in non-primate species? Behavioural reports and subjective claims by animal owners , 2008 .