How are users involved in enterprise systems implementations? In response, we draw on theories of social structure and use data drawn from a five year study of an enterprise system implementation at medium-sized university (MSU). The analysis of this data focuses on the differences among formal organizational structures, enterprise implementation project structures and the social structural network of ties among those involved in the implementation effort. Doing so helps to highlight the changed relationships between users, product developers, third-party consultants and the internal information systems people. Our findings indicate that users are only loosely connected to the implementation effort and that their involvement is always intermediated by other people (such as internal computing services personnel, managers, vendors and consultants). We also find that the weak tie relations among the members of the enterprise implementation project are important to the overall success of the effort – more successful than are the strong ties links that are more formally valued. Finally, we note that the shape of the social structure reflects the adaptation of the organization to respond to technical uncertainties and issues. That is, the technical issues with an enterprise system implementation are reflected in the social structures of that effort. SOMEONE TELL THE USERS: A SOCIAL-STRUCTURE PERSPECTIVE OF ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION
[1]
Frédéric Adam,et al.
Lessons from enterprise resource planning implementations in Ireland – towards smaller and shorter ERP projects
,
2000,
J. Inf. Technol..
[2]
Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.
Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community
,
1996
.
[3]
Chee-Sing Yap,et al.
IT implementation through the lens of organizational learning: a case study of insuror
,
1997,
ICIS '97.
[4]
Chiara Francalanci,et al.
Predicting the implementation effort of ERP projects: empirical evidence on SAP/R3
,
2001,
J. Inf. Technol..
[5]
R. Burt.
The Network Structure Of Social Capital
,
2000
.
[6]
Wayne E. Baker,et al.
The Social Structure of a National Securities Market
,
1984,
American Journal of Sociology.
[7]
R. Burt.
Toward a structural theory of action
,
1982
.
[8]
John Seely Brown,et al.
Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages
,
2000
.
[9]
Steve Sawyer,et al.
The distribution of computing: the knowledge markets of distributed technical support specialists
,
1998,
Inf. Technol. People.
[10]
Daniel Alpert,et al.
Performance and Paralysis: The Organizational Context of the American Research University.
,
1985
.