A Multi‐criteria Assessment of Deflection Methods for Dangerous NEOs

Over the last few years, the possible scenario of an asteroid threatening to impact the Earth has stimulated an intense debate among the scientific community about possible deviation methods. In this paper we present a comparative assessment of some of the more feasible mitigation schemes reviewed in the literature (i.e. solar collector, nuclear blast, kinetic impactor, low-thrust propulsion and mass driver). For each strategy, a multi-criteria optimization method has been used to construct a set of Pareto optimal solutions, minimizing both the mass of the spacecraft and the warning time, while simultaneously maximizing the deviation. A dominance criterion has then been defined and used to compare all the Pareto sets. The achievable deviation at the MOID, either for a low-thrust or for an impulsive manoeuver, has been computed through a set of analytical formulas. The variation in the orbit of the NEO has been estimated through a deviation action model that takes into account the wet mass of the spacecraft on the Earth. Finally, the technology readiness level of each strategy has been used to recompute a more realistic value for the required warning time.

[1]  P. L. Smith,et al.  DEFLECTING A NEAR EARTH OBJECT WITH TODAY'S SPACE TECHNOLOGY , 2004 .

[2]  J. Spitale.  Asteroid Hazard Mitigation Using the Yarkovsky Effect , 2002, Science.

[3]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[4]  R. P. Young,et al.  Experimental hypervelocity impact effects on simulated planetesimal materials , 1994 .

[5]  Bruce A. Conway.  OPTIMAL LOW-THRUST INTERCEPTION OF EARTH-CROSSING ASTEROIDS , 1996 .

[6]  John L. Remo.  Energy requirements and payload masses for near-Earth objects hazard mitigation , 2000 .

[7]  Daniel J. Scheeres,et al.  The Mechanics of Moving Asteroids , 2004 .

[8]  H. Melosh,et al.  NON-NUCLEAR STRATEGIES FOR DEFLECTING COMETS AND ASTEROIDS , 2021, Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids.

[9]  Christie Alisa Maddock,et al.  Comparison of Single and Multi-Spacecraft Configurations for NEA Deflection by Solar Sublimation , 2007 .

[10]  Ekkehard Kührt,et al.  Optimal deflection of NEOs en route of collision with the Earth , 2006 .

[11]  I. Michael Ross,et al.  Gravitational Effects of Earth in Optimizing ?V for Deflecting Earth-Crossing Asteroids , 2001 .

[12]  S. Chesley,et al.  Resonant returns to close approaches: Analytical theory ? , 2003 .

[13]  J. S. Mackay.  Space mission analysis. , 1968 .

[14]  I. Michael Ross,et al.  Two-Body Optimization for Deflecting Earth-Crossing Asteroids , 1999 .

[15]  V. V. Ivashkin,et al.  An analysis of some methods of asteroid hazard mitigation for the Earth , 1995 .

[16]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  Preliminary Design of Low-Thrust Multiple Gravity-Assist Trajectories , 2006 .

[17]  R. Battin.  An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics , 1987 .

[18]  T. Ahrens,et al.  Deflection and fragmentation of near-Earth asteroids , 1992, Nature.

[19]  M. Thomas,et al.  Inflatable space structures , 1992, IEEE Potentials.

[20]  Bruce A. Conway,et al.  Near-Optimal Deflection of Earth-Approaching Asteroids , 2001 .

[21]  J. Junkins,et al.  Analytical Mechanics of Space Systems , 2003 .

[22]  G. Hahn,et al.  Physical limits of solar collectors in deflecting Earth-threatening asteroids , 2006 .

[23]  Andrea Boattini,et al.  Deflecting NEOs in Route of Collision with the Earth , 2002 .

[24]  Colin R. McInnes,et al.  Deflection of near-Earth asteroids by kinetic energy impacts from retrograde orbits , 2004 .