Physiologically mediated self/non-self discrimination in roots.

Recent evidence suggests that self/non-self discrimination exists among roots; its mechanisms, however, are still unclear. We compared the growth of Buchloe dactyloides cuttings that were grown in the presence of neighbors that belonged to the same physiological individual, were separated from each other for variable periods, or originated from adjacent or remote tillers on the same clone. The results demonstrate that B. dactyloides plants are able to differentiate between self and non-self neighbors and develop fewer and shorter roots in the presence of other roots of the same individual. Furthermore, once cuttings that originate from the very same node are separated, they become progressively alienated from each other and eventually relate to each other as genetically alien plants. The results suggest that the observed self/non-self discrimination is mediated by physiological coordination among roots that developed on the same plant rather than allogenetic recognition. The observed physiological coordination is based on an as yet unknown mechanism and has important ecological implications, because it allows the avoidance of competition with self and the allocation of greater resources to alternative functions.

[1]  J E Varner,et al.  Plant growth and development. , 1980, Science.

[2]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Root growth responses of three Great Basin perennials to intra and interspecific contact with other roots , 1995 .

[3]  A. Meyer,et al.  Wound-Induced Changes of Membrane Voltage, Endogenous Currents, and Ion Fluxes in Primary Roots of Maize , 1997, Plant physiology.

[4]  A. Leopold,et al.  Plant Growth and Development , 2019, Stress Physiology of Woody Plants.

[5]  Dan Cohen,et al.  Ecological implications of correlative inhibition between plant shoots , 1989 .

[6]  R. K. Saxena,et al.  MICROBIAL LIPASES : POTENTIAL BIOCATALYSTS FOR THE FUTURE INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[7]  R. Callaway,et al.  Root communication among desert shrubs. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Gersani,et al.  Development correlations between roots in heterogeneous environments , 1992 .

[9]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Intra-plant versus Inter-plant Root Competition in Beans: avoidance, resource matching or tragedy of the commons , 2002, Plant Ecology.

[10]  A. Richman.  Evolution of balanced genetic polymorphism , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[11]  J. Nasrallah,et al.  Recognizing self in the self-incompatibility response. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[12]  Ariel Novoplansky,et al.  Self/non‐self discrimination in roots , 2003 .

[13]  R. Grosberg,et al.  Mate selection and the evolution of highly polymorphic self/nonself recognition genes. , 2000, Science.

[14]  A. Ortuño,et al.  Changes in the concentration of indole‐3‐acetic acid during the growth of etiolated lupin hypocotyls , 1990 .

[15]  B. Rinkevich,et al.  Allorecognition responses in the soft coral Parerythropodium fulvum fulvum from the Red Sea. , 1996 .

[16]  D. R. Hoagland,et al.  The Water-Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil , 2018 .

[17]  R. Snow.  ON THE UPWARD INHIBITING EFFECT OF AUXIN IN SHOOTS , 1938 .

[18]  Gen Tamiya,et al.  Complete sequence and gene map of a human major histocompatibility complex , 1999 .

[19]  A. Novoplansky.  Ecological implications of the determination of branch hierarchies. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[20]  R. Grosberg.  The Evolution of Allorecognition Specificity in Clonal Invertebrates , 1988, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[21]  B. Rinkevich,et al.  A complex allorecognition system in a reef-building coral: delayed responses, reversals and nontransitive hierarchies , 2004, Coral Reefs.

[22]  S. Goldhor.  Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[23]  P. Bassett-Smith.  Coral Reefs , 1889, Nature.

[24]  Jan Walleczek,et al.  Self-Organized Biological Dynamics and Nonlinear Control , 2006 .

[25]  M. Weisenseel,et al.  Growth, Gravitropism, and Endogenous Ion Currents of Cress Roots (Lepidium sativum L.) : Measurements Using a Novel Three-Dimensional Recording Probe. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[26]  Johanna Schmitt,et al.  Testing the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Density-Dependent Selection on Manipulated Stem Length in Impatiens capensis , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[27]  R. W. Snow.  Experiments on Growth and Inhibition. Part II.--New Phenomena of Inhibition , 1931 .

[28]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition , 2001 .

[29]  Machiko Kimura,et al.  Allometry and life history of a forest understory palm Pinanga coronata (Arecaceae) on Mount Halimun, West Java , 2002, Ecological Research.

[30]  S. Smith,et al.  Turfgrass Evaluation of Native Grasses for the Northern Great Plains Region , 2002 .

[31]  C. Weinig.  PLASTICITY VERSUS CANALIZATION: POPULATION DIFFERENCES IN THE TIMING OF SHADE‐AVOIDANCE RESPONSES , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  R. Callaway,et al.  Root Communication Mechanisms and Intracommunity Distributions of Two Mojave Desert Shrubs , 1992 .

[33]  P. Alpert,et al.  Root cooperation in a clonal plant: connected strawberries segregate roots , 2002, Oecologia.

[34]  H. J. Schenk,et al.  Spatial Root Segregation: Are Plants Territorial? , 1999 .

[35]  W. Potts,et al.  The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[36]  T. Sachs.  Pattern Formation in Plant Tissues , 1991 .

[37]  L. Aarssen.  Hypotheses for the evolution of apical dominance in plants : implications for the interpretation of overcompensation , 1995 .