Change Detection Applications in the Earth Sciences Using UAS-Based Sensing: A Review and Future Opportunities

Over the past decade, advancements in collection platforms such as unoccupied aerial systems (UAS), survey-grade GNSS, sensor packages, processing software, and spatial analytical tools have facilitated change detection analyses at an unprecedented resolution over broader spatial and temporal extents and in environments where such investigations present challenges. These technological improvements, coupled with the accessibility and versatility of UAS technology, have pushed the boundaries of spatial and temporal scales in geomorphic change detection. As a result, the cm-scale analysis of topographic signatures can detect and quantify surface anomalies during geomorphic evolution. This review focuses on the use of UAS photogrammetry for fine spatial (cm) and temporal (hours to days) scale geomorphic analyses, and it highlights analytical approaches to detect and quantify surface processes that were previously elusive. The review provides insight into topographic change characterization with precise spatial validations applied to landscape processes in various fields, such as the cryosphere and geosphere, as well as anthropogenic earth processes and national security applications. This work sheds light on previously unexplored aspects of both natural and human-engineered environments, demonstrating the potential of UAS observations in change detection. Our discussion examines the emerging horizons of UAS-based change detection, including machine learning and LIDAR systems. In addition, our meta-analysis of spatial and temporal UAS-based observations highlights the new fine-scale niche of UAS-photogrammetry. This scale advancement sets a new frontier in change detection, offering exciting possibilities for the future of land surface analysis and environmental monitoring in the field of Earth Science.

[1]  A. Kroon,et al.  Evaluation of the Apple iPhone 12 Pro LiDAR for an Application in Geosciences , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[2]  A. Young,et al.  Automating coastal cliff erosion measurements from large-area LiDAR datasets in California, USA , 2021 .

[3]  Bernhard Höfle,et al.  M3C2-EP: Pushing the limits of 3D topographic point cloud change detection by error propagation , 2021, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Paolo Ciavola,et al.  Using High-Spatial Resolution UAV-Derived Data to Evaluate Vegetation and Geomorphological Changes on a Dune Field Involved in a Restoration Endeavour , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[5]  E. Swanson,et al.  A New Method for High Resolution Surface Change Detection: Data Collection and Validation of Measurements from UAS at the Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, USA , 2021, Drones.

[6]  E. Puniach,et al.  Application of UAV-based orthomosaics for determination of horizontal displacement caused by underground mining , 2021 .

[7]  J. Major,et al.  Lava effusion rate evolution and erupted volume during the 2018 Kīlauea lower East Rift Zone eruption , 2021, Bulletin of Volcanology.

[8]  K. Nikolakopoulos,et al.  Repeated UAV Campaigns, GNSS Measurements, GIS, and Petrographic Analyses for Landslide Mapping and Monitoring , 2021, Minerals.

[9]  B. Moorman,et al.  Arctic coastal erosion: UAV-SfM data collection strategies for planimetric and volumetric measurements1 , 2021 .

[10]  Riccardo Scipinotti,et al.  The Spatio-Temporal Variability of Frost Blisters in a Perennial Frozen Lake along the Antarctic Coast as Indicator of the Groundwater Supply , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[11]  L. Jorge,et al.  A Review on Deep Learning in UAV Remote Sensing , 2021, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[12]  Craig M. Turner,et al.  Assessing Geomorphic Change in Restored Coastal Dune Ecosystems Using a Multi-Platform Aerial Approach , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[13]  D. Rocchini,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems‐based monitoring of the eco‐geomorphology of coastal dunes through spectral Rao's Q , 2021 .

[14]  Ivan Maric,et al.  New Method for Automated Quantification of Vertical Spatio-Temporal Changes within Gully Cross-Sections Based on Very-High-Resolution Models , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[15]  W. Seyoum,et al.  High-Resolution Mapping of Tile Drainage in Agricultural Fields Using Unmanned Aerial System (UAS)-Based Radiometric Thermal and Optical Sensors , 2020, Hydrology.

[16]  O. Tzoraki,et al.  Using UAV to Capture and Record Torrent Bed and Banks, Flood Debris, and Riparian Areas , 2020, Drones.

[17]  L. Zoet,et al.  Seasonality in cold coast bluff erosion processes , 2020 .

[18]  Iain Fairley,et al.  Spatial Variation in Coastal Dune Evolution in a High Tidal Range Environment , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[19]  Okan Özcan,et al.  Multi-temporal UAV based repeat monitoring of rivers sensitive to flood , 2020 .

[20]  Daniel Nicolas Hofstadler,et al.  Riverine Sediment Changes and Channel Pattern of a Gravel-Bed Mountain Torrent , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[21]  L. Zoet,et al.  Three-dimensional bluff evolution in response to seasonal fluctuations in Great Lakes water levels , 2020 .

[22]  F. Catani Landslide detection by deep learning of non-nadiral and crowdsourced optical images , 2020, Landslides.

[23]  Richard E. Kelley,et al.  High-resolution surface topographic change analyses to characterize a series of underground explosions , 2020 .

[24]  U. Andriolo,et al.  Beach-dune morphodynamics and marine macro-litter abundance: An integrated approach with Unmanned Aerial System. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  MODELLING PERMAFROST TERRAIN USING KINEMATIC, DUAL-WAVELENGTH LASER SCANNING , 2020 .

[26]  Dr Robert Bryant,et al.  Optimization of UAVs‐SfM data collection in aeolian landform morphodynamics: a case study from the Gonghe Basin, China , 2020, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

[27]  Mostafa Hassanalian,et al.  A Comprehensive Review of Applications of Drone Technology in the Mining Industry , 2020, Drones.

[28]  Thomas R. Walter,et al.  The 2019 Eruption Dynamics and Morphology at Ebeko Volcano Monitored by Unoccupied Aircraft Systems (UAS) and Field Stations , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[29]  D. Jean Hutchinson,et al.  The Implications of M3C2 Projection Diameter on 3D Semi-Automated Rockfall Extraction from Sequential Terrestrial Laser Scanning Point Clouds , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[30]  T. Walter,et al.  UAS-based tracking of the Santiaguito Lava Dome, Guatemala , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Thomas R. Walter,et al.  Volcanological applications of unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS): Developments, strategies, and future challenges , 2020 .

[32]  Alberto Pellegrinelli,et al.  Coastal Mapping Using DJI Phantom 4 RTK in Post-Processing Kinematic Mode , 2020, Drones.

[33]  Anshuman Bhardwaj,et al.  Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Cryosphere: Latest Advances and Prospects , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[34]  V. Melnikov,et al.  Seasonal Thawing Local Changes Indicators for UAV-Based Cryolithozone Mapping , 2020, Doklady Earth Sciences.

[35]  David J. A. Evans,et al.  Sub‐annual moraine formation at an active temperate Icelandic glacier , 2020, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

[36]  B. Höfle,et al.  Multitemporal terrestrial laser scanning point clouds for thaw subsidence observation at Arctic permafrost monitoring sites , 2020, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

[37]  C. Winter,et al.  Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry , 2020, Geo-Marine Letters.

[38]  Zhou Dawei,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Photogrammetry Technology for Dynamic Mining Subsidence Monitoring and Parameter Inversion: A Case Study in China , 2020, IEEE Access.

[39]  Tamás Lovas,et al.  Application of UAV in Topographic Modelling and Structural Geological Mapping of Quarries and Their Surroundings—Delineation of Fault-Bordered Raw Material Reserves , 2020, Sensors.

[40]  K. Clark,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Surface Displacements During the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake (New Zealand) From Photogrammetry‐Derived Point Clouds , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[41]  Timothy Nagle-McNaughton,et al.  Measuring Change Using Quantitative Differencing of Repeat Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry: The Effect of Storms on Coastal Boulder Deposits , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[42]  A. A. Affonso,et al.  Dune migration and volume change from airborne LiDAR, terrestrial LiDAR and Structure from Motion-Multi View Stereo , 2019, Comput. Geosci..

[43]  D. Jean Hutchinson,et al.  Three-dimensional rockfall shape back analysis: methods and implications , 2019 .

[44]  Unal Okyay,et al.  Airborne lidar change detection: An overview of Earth sciences applications , 2019, Earth-Science Reviews.

[45]  Robin T. Wilson,et al.  Quantifying Below-Water Fluvial Geomorphic Change: The Implications of Refraction Correction, Water Surface Elevations, and Spatially Variable Error , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[46]  A. Brenning,et al.  Accounting for permafrost creep in high-resolution snow depth mapping by modelling sub-snow ground deformation , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[47]  Soyoung Park,et al.  Feasibility of UAV Photogrammetry for Coastal Monitoring: A Case Study in Imlang Beach, South Korea , 2019, Journal of Coastal Research.

[48]  N. Glenn,et al.  Partitioned by process: Measuring post‐fire debris‐flow and rill erosion with Structure from Motion photogrammetry , 2019, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

[49]  Omid Ghorbanzadeh,et al.  UAV-Based Slope Failure Detection Using Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[50]  J. Pagán,et al.  Validating UAS-Based Photogrammetry with Traditional Topographic Methods for Surveying Dune Ecosystems in the Spanish Mediterranean Coast , 2019, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.

[51]  O. Sonnentag,et al.  Tundra shrub expansion may amplify permafrost thaw by advancing snowmelt timing , 2019 .

[52]  C. Tseng,et al.  MULTI-TEMPORAL HIGH-RESOLUTION LANDSLIDE MONITORING BASED ON UAS PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND UAS LIDAR GEOINFORMATION , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[53]  Wu Xiao,et al.  A review of UAV monitoring in mining areas: current status and future perspectives , 2019, International Journal of Coal Science & Technology.

[54]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  An overview of ABoVE airborne campaign data acquisitions and science opportunities , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[55]  Zhengfu Bian,et al.  Analysis of the Development of an Erosion Gully in an Open-Pit Coal Mine Dump During a Winter Freeze-Thaw Cycle by Using Low-Cost UAVs , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[56]  M. Westoby,et al.  Low-budget topographic surveying comes of age: Structure from motion photogrammetry in geography and the geosciences , 2019, Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment.

[57]  Chi Ma,et al.  Resolving Fine-Scale Surface Features on Polar Sea Ice: A First Assessment of UAS Photogrammetry Without Ground Control , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[58]  F. Marchese,et al.  UAV-based surveying in volcano-tectonics: An example from the Iceland rift , 2019, Journal of Structural Geology.

[59]  Alberto Pellegrinelli,et al.  UAVs for Structure-From-Motion Coastal Monitoring: A Case Study to Assess the Evolution of Embryo Dunes over a Two-Year Time Frame in the Po River Delta, Italy † , 2019, Sensors.

[60]  Andreas Stoffel,et al.  Monitoring of Snow Cover Ablation Using Very High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Datasets , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[61]  Lixin Wu,et al.  Registration of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Surveys Using Terrain-Invariant Regions for Measuring Exploitative Volumes over Open-Pit Mines , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[62]  B. Castelle,et al.  Low-Cost UAV for High-Resolution and Large-Scale Coastal Dune Change Monitoring Using Photogrammetry , 2019, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.

[63]  D. J. Hutchinson,et al.  The use of terrestrial laser scanning for the characterization of a cliff-talus system in the Thompson River Valley, British Columbia, Canada , 2019, Geomorphology.

[64]  J. Barlow,et al.  Detection and analysis of mass wasting events in chalk sea cliffs using UAV photogrammetry , 2019, Engineering Geology.

[65]  Scott D. Hamshaw,et al.  Application of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) for monitoring bank erosion along river corridors , 2019, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk.

[66]  M. Cantarero,et al.  UAVs for volcano monitoring: A new approach applied on an active lava flow on Mt. Etna (Italy), during the 27 February–02 March 2017 eruption , 2019, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research.

[67]  Andrew M. Cunliffe,et al.  Rapid retreat of permafrost coastline observed with aerial drone photogrammetry , 2018, The Cryosphere.

[68]  Neal Snooke,et al.  High-accuracy UAV photogrammetry of ice sheet dynamics with no ground control , 2018, The Cryosphere.

[69]  Y. Hayakawa,et al.  Landslides triggered by an earthquake and heavy rainfalls at Aso volcano, Japan, detected by UAS and SfM-MVS photogrammetry , 2018, Progress in Earth and Planetary Science.

[70]  Jurjen van der Sluijs,et al.  Permafrost Terrain Dynamics and Infrastructure Impacts Revealed by UAV Photogrammetry and Thermal Imaging , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[71]  Athanassios Ganas,et al.  Mapping an earthquake-induced landslide based on UAV imagery; case study of the 2015 Okeanos landslide, Lefkada, Greece , 2018, Engineering Geology.

[72]  G. Jouvet,et al.  Short-lived ice speed-up and plume water flow captured by a VTOL UAV give insights into subglacial hydrological system of Bowdoin Glacier , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[73]  Jan Pfeiffer,et al.  Derivation of Three-Dimensional Displacement Vectors from Multi-Temporal Long-Range Terrestrial Laser Scanning at the Reissenschuh Landslide (Tyrol, Austria) , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[74]  W. Uijttewaal,et al.  Bank erosion processes measured with UAV-SfM along complex banklines of a straight mid-sized river reach , 2018, Earth Surface Dynamics.

[75]  J. Mills,et al.  Automated co‐registration and calibration in SfM photogrammetry for landslide change detection , 2018, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

[76]  Thomas R. Walter,et al.  Localized and distributed erosion triggered by the 2015 Hurricane Patricia investigated by repeated drone surveys and time lapse cameras at Volcán de Colima, Mexico , 2018, Geomorphology.

[77]  Brian J. Moorman,et al.  Detecting Short-Term Surface Melt on an Arctic Glacier Using UAV Surveys , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[78]  B. Schneider,et al.  Tsunami and storm sediments in Oman: Characterizing extreme wave deposits using terrestrial laser scanning , 2018, Journal of Coastal Conservation.

[79]  T. Maruyama,et al.  The M7 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, Earthquake: 3‐D Deformation Along the Fault and Within the Damage Zone Constrained From Differential Lidar Topography , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[80]  Julian Podgórski,et al.  Revealing recent calving activity of a tidewater glacier with terrestrial LiDAR reflection intensity , 2018, Cold Regions Science and Technology.

[81]  A. Hayes Dunes across the Solar System , 2018, Science.

[82]  P. Tarolli,et al.  Open-pit mine geomorphic changes analysis using multi-temporal UAV survey , 2018, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[83]  Roberto Colombo,et al.  Rapid melting dynamics of an alpine glacier with repeated UAV photogrammetry , 2018 .

[84]  Craig Glennie,et al.  High-Resolution Mapping of Near-Field Deformation With Airborne Earth Observation Data, a Comparison Study , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[85]  Richard J. Hardy,et al.  Optimising 4-D surface change detection: an approach for capturing rockfall magnitude–frequency , 2018 .

[86]  C. Saroglou,et al.  UAV-based mapping, back analysis and trajectory modeling of a coseismic rockfall in Lefkada island, Greece , 2018 .

[87]  Kunwar K. Singh,et al.  A meta-analysis and review of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) imagery for terrestrial applications , 2018 .

[88]  Pedro Pina,et al.  Evaluation of the use of very high resolution aerial imagery for accurate ice-wedge polygon mapping (Adventdalen, Svalbard). , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[89]  Subandriyo,et al.  Morphological and structural changes at the Merapi lava dome monitored in 2012–15 using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) , 2018 .

[90]  Aviva J. Sussman,et al.  Detecting Surface Changes from an Underground Explosion in Granite Using Unmanned Aerial System Photogrammetry , 2018, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[91]  Reinhard Fromm,et al.  Multitemporal Accuracy and Precision Assessment of Unmanned Aerial System Photogrammetry for Slope-Scale Snow Depth Maps in Alpine Terrain , 2018, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[92]  E. Bernard,et al.  Investigating snowpack volumes and icing dynamics in the moraine of an Arctic catchment using UAV photogrammetry , 2017 .

[93]  G. Masselink,et al.  Classification of beach response to extreme storms , 2017 .

[94]  S. Hreinsdóttir,et al.  Highly variable coastal deformation in the 2016 MW7.8 Kaikōura earthquake reflects rupture complexity along a transpressional plate boundary , 2017 .

[95]  M. Scaioni,et al.  LOCAL AND GENERAL MONITORING OF FORNI GLACIER (ITALIAN ALPS) USING MULTI-PLATFORM STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2017 .

[96]  M. Cavalli,et al.  Assessment of erosion and deposition in steep mountain basins by differencing sequential digital terrain models , 2017 .

[97]  Izabela Karsznia,et al.  UAV-based detection and spatial analyses of periglacial landforms on Demay Point (King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica) , 2017 .

[98]  P. Chirico,et al.  Mapping informal small-scale mining features in a data-sparse tropical environment with a small UAS , 2017 .

[99]  Craig Glennie,et al.  Review of Earth science research using terrestrial laser scanning , 2017 .

[100]  Jason W. Karl,et al.  Fine-Resolution Repeat Topographic Surveying of Dryland Landscapes Using UAS-Based Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry: Assessing Accuracy and Precision against Traditional Ground-Based Erosion Measurements , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[101]  Brice R. Rea,et al.  Using UAV acquired photography and structure from motion techniques for studying glacier landforms: application to the glacial flutes at Isfallsglaciären , 2017 .

[102]  Ruedi Boesch,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles' Imagery on Glaciers , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[103]  Yosoon Choi,et al.  Mapping hazardous mining-induced sinkhole subsidence using unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) photogrammetry , 2017, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[104]  K. Cook An evaluation of the effectiveness of low-cost UAVs and structure from motion for geomorphic change detection , 2017 .

[105]  Xi-wei Xu,et al.  High-resolution mapping based on an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) to capture paleoseismic offsets along the Altyn-Tagh fault, China , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[106]  D. Morton,et al.  Patterns of canopy and surface layer consumption in a boreal forest fire from repeat airborne lidar , 2017 .

[107]  Jiaojiao Tian,et al.  3D change detection – Approaches and applications , 2016 .

[108]  Takahiro Abe,et al.  Initiation of a major calving event on the Bowdoin Glacier captured by UAV photogrammetry , 2016 .

[109]  Toby N. Tonkin,et al.  Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[110]  Joseph M. Shea,et al.  Reduced melt on debris-covered glaciers: investigations from Changri NupGlacier, Nepal , 2016 .

[111]  E. Berthier,et al.  Quantifying volume loss from ice cliffs on debris-covered glaciers using high-resolution terrestrial and aerial photogrammetry , 2016 .

[112]  N. Long,et al.  ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL TOPOGRAPHY DERIVED FROM UAV IMAGES , 2016 .

[113]  Charles K. Toth,et al.  UAS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING WITH VELODYNE LiDAR SENSOR , 2016 .

[114]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Estimation of forest biomass dynamics in subtropical forests using multi-temporal airborne LiDAR data , 2016 .

[115]  Carlos Castillo,et al.  Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry - merits, limits and developments , 2016 .

[116]  M. Favalli,et al.  Lidar surveys reveal eruptive volumes and rates at Etna, 2007–2010 , 2016 .

[117]  Mark W. Smith,et al.  Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography , 2016 .

[118]  Toby N. Tonkin,et al.  Ice-cored moraine degradation mapped and quantified using an unmanned aerial vehicle: A case study from a polythermal glacier in Svalbard , 2016 .

[119]  Anshuman Bhardwaj,et al.  UAVs as remote sensing platform in glaciology: Present applications and future prospects , 2016 .

[120]  Ian C. Fuller,et al.  Application of geomorphic change detection (GCD) to quantify morphological budgeting error in a New Zealand gravel-bed river: A case study from the Makaroro river, Hawke's bay , 2016 .

[121]  Stephen B. DeLong,et al.  Rates and patterns of surface deformation from laser scanning following the South Napa earthquake, California , 2015 .

[122]  John Woodward,et al.  Interannual surface evolution of an Antarctic blue-ice moraine using multi-temporal DEMs , 2015 .

[123]  Dimitri Lague,et al.  Analyzing High Resolution Topography for Advancing the Understanding of Mass and Energy Transfer Through Landscapes: A Review , 2015 .

[124]  Mozhdeh Shahbazi,et al.  Uav-Based Point Cloud Generation for Open-Pit Mine Modelling , 2015 .

[125]  M. Nolan,et al.  Mapping snow depth from manned aircraft on landscape scales at centimeter resolution using structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[126]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Exhumation by debris flows in the 2013 Colorado Front Range storm , 2015 .

[127]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation , 2015 .

[128]  J. Ryan,et al.  UAV photogrammetry and structure from motion to assess calving dynamics at Store Glacier, a large outlet draining the Greenland ice sheet , 2015 .

[129]  Takayuki Nakano,et al.  LANDFORM MONITORING IN ACTIVE VOLCANO BY UAV AND SFM-MVS TECHNIQUE , 2014 .

[130]  Jon D. Pelletier,et al.  How do sediment yields from post‐wildfire debris‐laden flows depend on terrain slope, soil burn severity class, and drainage basin area? Insights from airborne‐LiDAR change detection , 2014 .

[131]  Robert J. McGaughey,et al.  Monitoring selective logging in western Amazonia with repeat lidar flights , 2014 .

[132]  S. M. Jong,et al.  High-resolution monitoring of Himalayan glacier dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicles , 2014 .

[133]  S. M. Jong,et al.  Mapping landslide displacements using Structure from Motion (SfM) and image correlation of multi-temporal UAV photography , 2014 .

[134]  Cheryl J. Hapke,et al.  Geomorphic and human influence on large-scale coastal change , 2013 .

[135]  H. Maas,et al.  Quantitative Measurement of Soil Erosion from Tls and Uav Data , 2013 .

[136]  Arie C. Seijmonsbergen,et al.  Geomorphological Change Detection Using Object-Based Feature Extraction From Multi-Temporal LiDAR Data , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[137]  Hans-Dieter Viktor Boehm,et al.  Multi-Temporal Airborne LiDAR-Survey and Field Measurements of Tropical Peat Swamp Forest to Monitor Changes , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[138]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  Kinematics of active earthflows revealed by digital image correlation and DEM subtraction techniques applied to multi‐temporal LiDAR data , 2013 .

[139]  E. Næsset,et al.  Detection of biomass change in a Norwegian mountain forest area using small footprint airborne laser scanner data , 2013, Stat. Methods Appl..

[140]  Robert Denham,et al.  The use of multi temporal LiDAR to assess basin-scale erosion and deposition following the catastrophic January 2011 Lockyer flood, SE Queensland, Australia , 2013 .

[141]  D. Lague,et al.  Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z) , 2013, 1302.1183.

[142]  George E. Hilley,et al.  Multitemporal ALSM change detection, sediment delivery, and process mapping at an active earthflow , 2012 .

[143]  Ping Lu,et al.  Object-Oriented Change Detection for Landslide Rapid Mapping , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[144]  M. Jaboyedoff,et al.  Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[145]  Justin K. Dix,et al.  Assessing debris flows using LIDAR differencing: 18 May 2005 Matata event, New Zealand , 2010 .

[146]  William J. Burns,et al.  Analysis of Elevation Changes Detected from Multi-Temporal LiDAR Surveys in Forested Landslide Terrain in Western Oregon , 2010 .

[147]  Soumya Ghosh,et al.  Automatic Annotation of Planetary Surfaces With Geomorphic Labels , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[148]  J. Brasington,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets , 2009 .

[149]  G. Hurtt,et al.  Estimation of tropical forest height and biomass dynamics using lidar remote sensing at La Selva, Costa Rica , 2009 .

[150]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Modeling the World from Internet Photo Collections , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[151]  Sébastien Leprince,et al.  Automatic and Precise Orthorectification, Coregistration, and Subpixel Correlation of Satellite Images, Application to Ground Deformation Measurements , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[152]  T. Blaschke,et al.  Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis , 2006 .

[153]  D. Girardeau-Montaut,et al.  CHANGE DETECTION ON POINTS CLOUD DATA ACQUIRED W ITH A GROUND LASER SCANNER , 2005 .

[154]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Remote sensing of vegetation and land-cover change in Arctic Tundra Ecosystems , 2004 .

[155]  Qing Zhu,et al.  Effects of Various Factors on the Accuracy of DEMs: An Intensive Experimental Investigation , 2000 .

[156]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  Metro: Measuring Error on Simplified Surfaces , 1998, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[157]  Richard D. Keane,et al.  Theory of cross-correlation analysis of PIV images , 1992 .

[158]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data , 1989 .