From Individuals to Groups and Back: The Evolutionary Implications of Group Phenotypic Composition

[1]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  The role of social and ecological processes in structuring animal populations: a case study from automated tracking of wild birds , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[2]  William Hoppitt,et al.  Interspecific social networks promote information transmission in wild songbirds , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Daniel W. Franks,et al.  Ecological Knowledge, Leadership, and the Evolution of Menopause in Killer Whales , 2015, Current Biology.

[4]  A. Thornton,et al.  Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds , 2014, Nature.

[5]  L. Morrell,et al.  Prey body size mediates the predation risk associated with being “odd” , 2015 .

[6]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  M. Elgar,et al.  Leaders benefit followers in the collective movement of a social sawfly , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  C. Grozinger,et al.  Me and we: the interplay between individual and group behavioral variation in social collectives. , 2014, Current opinion in insect science.

[9]  Charles J. Goodnight,et al.  Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions , 2014, Nature.

[10]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  P. Smaldino.  The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  J. Pruitt,et al.  The personality types of key catalytic individuals shape colonies' collective behaviour and success , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  A. Bell,et al.  Strong personalities, not social niches, drive individual differences in social behaviours in sticklebacks , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Exploring the effects of individual traits and within-colony variation on task differentiation and collective behavior in a desert social spider , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  R. Thomas,et al.  Dietary wariness influences the response of foraging birds to competitors , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Culum Brown,et al.  Individual personality traits influence group exploration in a feral guppy population , 2014 .

[17]  S. Nuzhdin,et al.  Genetic variation in niche construction: implications for development and evolutionary genetics. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  T. Bilde,et al.  Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Robert B O'Hara,et al.  Social Learning of Migratory Performance , 2013, Science.

[20]  J. Pruitt,et al.  RETRACTED: Linking levels of personality: personalities of the ‘average’ and ‘most extreme’ group members predict colony-level personality , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  L. Aplin,et al.  Milk bottles revisited: social learning and individual variation in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Wayne M Getz,et al.  Factors Influencing Foraging Search Efficiency: Why Do Scarce Lappet-Faced Vultures Outperform Ubiquitous White-Backed Vultures? , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[23]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[24]  D. Farine,et al.  Social network analysis of mixed-species flocks: exploring the structure and evolution of interspecific social behaviour , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Behavioural traits of colony founders affect the life history of their colonies. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[26]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Iterative Evolution of Increased Behavioral Variation Characterizes the Transition to Sociality in Spiders and Proves Advantageous , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[27]  F. Pelletier,et al.  Population consequences of individual variation in behaviour , 2012 .

[28]  S. Foitzik,et al.  Characterizing the Collective Personality of Ant Societies: Aggressive Colonies Do Not Abandon Their Home , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  A. Flack,et al.  What are leaders made of? The role of individual experience in determining leader–follower relations in homing pigeons , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  H. Klug,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS CHANGES PREDICTIONS ABOUT INTERACTING PHENOTYPES , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  Se Jin Song,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment From superspreaders to disease hotspots : linking transmission across hosts and space , 2011 .

[32]  Robert D Magrath,et al.  A micro-geography of fear: learning to eavesdrop on alarm calls of neighbouring heterospecifics , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S12 Table S1 Full Reference List , 2022 .

[34]  A. Gallup,et al.  The Group-Level Consequences of Sexual Conflict in Multigroup Populations , 2011, PloS one.

[35]  M. C. Ferrari,et al.  Intraspecific trait variants determine the nature of interspecific interactions in a habitat-forming species. , 2011, Ecology.

[36]  Julie Morand-Ferron,et al.  Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Susanne Foitzik,et al.  Productivity increases with variation in aggression among group members in Temnothorax ants , 2011 .

[38]  Márcio S Araújo,et al.  The ecological causes of individual specialisation. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[39]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Indirect genetics effects and evolutionary constraint: an analysis of social dominance in red deer, Cervus elaphus , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[40]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  E. Cole,et al.  Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  Susan E. Riechert,et al.  How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  Franz J Weissing,et al.  On the coevolution of social responsiveness and behavioural consistency , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  Roger Schürch,et al.  The building-up of social relationships: behavioural types, social networks and cooperative breeding in a cichlid , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Within-group behavioral variation promotes biased task performance and the emergence of a defensive caste in a social spider , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[46]  A. J. Moore,et al.  INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS. III. SOCIAL EVOLUTION , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  H. Rundle,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR THE EVOLUTION OF INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS: CHANGES IN THE INTERACTION EFFECT COEFFICIENT, PSI (Ψ), DUE TO SEXUAL SELECTION , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[49]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Population differences in behaviour are explained by shared within‐population trait correlations , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[50]  Denis Réale,et al.  Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[51]  Erik Postma,et al.  An ecologist's guide to the animal model. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[52]  R. Wilcox,et al.  Aggressive mating as a tragedy of the commons in the water strider Aquarius remigis , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[53]  R. Arlinghaus,et al.  Coexistence of behavioural types in an aquatic top predator: a response to resource limitation? , 2009, Oecologia.

[54]  E. Brodie,et al.  How to Measure Indirect Genetic Effects: The Congruence of Trait-Based and Variance-Partitioning Approaches , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  S. Côté,et al.  Eco-evolutionary dynamics: disentangling phenotypic, environmental and population fluctuations , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[57]  J. Paleolog.  Behavioural characteristics of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies containing mix of workers of divergent behavioural traits. , 2009 .

[58]  J. Krause,et al.  Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy , 2009 .

[59]  P. Nonacs,et al.  Social heterosis and the maintenance of genetic diversity , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[60]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Eco‐evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems , 2007 .

[61]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  The Evolutionary Demography of Ecological Change: Linking Trait Variation and Population Growth , 2007, Science.

[62]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.

[63]  M. Winston,et al.  Retinue attraction and ovary activation: responses of wild type and anarchistic honey bees (Apis mellifera) to queen and brood pheromones , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[64]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Pairs of extreme avian personalities have highest reproductive success , 2005 .

[65]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[66]  Andrew Sih,et al.  The mix matters: behavioural types and group dynamics in water striders , 2005 .

[67]  Andrew M Simons,et al.  Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[68]  L. Kruuk.  Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model". , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[69]  M. Marini,et al.  Mixed-species bird flocks from Brazilian Atlantic forest: the effects of forest fragmentation and seasonality on their size, richness and stability , 2004 .

[70]  N. G. Wolf.  Odd fish abandon mixed-species groups when threatened , 1985, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[71]  F. J. Odling-Smee,et al.  Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution , 2003 .

[72]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[73]  L. Keller,et al.  Experimental conversion of colony social organization by manipulation of worker genotype composition in fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[74]  T. Grubb,et al.  Social context affects risk taking by a satellite species in a mixed-species foraging group , 2000 .

[75]  W. Ewens.  Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits , 1999 .

[76]  Larry Bull,et al.  On the Baldwin Effect , 1999, Artificial Life.

[77]  T. Grubb,et al.  Functional Roles in Mixed-Species Foraging Flocks: A Field Manipulation , 1999 .

[78]  A. J. Moore,et al.  Interacting Phenotypes and the Evolutionary Process. II. Selection Resulting from Social Interactions , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[79]  T. Grubb,et al.  Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[80]  S. Frank.  THE PRICE EQUATION, FISHER'S FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM, KIN SELECTION, AND CAUSAL ANALYSIS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[81]  A. J. Moore,et al.  INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS: I. DIRECT AND INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[82]  Neil J. Buckley,et al.  FOOD FINDING AND THE INFLUENCE OF INFORMATION, LOCAL ENHANCEMENT, AND COMMUNAL ROOSTING ON FORAGING SUCCESS OF NORTH AMERICAN VULTURES , 1996 .

[83]  P. Kaye.  Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[84]  G. Daily,et al.  Double keystone bird in a keystone species complex. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[85]  Charles J. Goodnight,et al.  Contextual Analysis of Models of Group Selection, Soft Selection, Hard Selection, and the Evolution of Altruism , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[86]  A. J. Hall.  Infectious diseases of humans: R. M. Anderson & R. M. May. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press, 1991. viii + 757 pp. Price £50. ISBN 0-19-854599-1 , 1992 .

[87]  P. Schmid-Hempel,et al.  Parasites and the advantage of genetic variability within social insect colonies , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[88]  T. Grubb.  Changes in the flocking behaviour of wintering English titmice with time, weather and supplementary food , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[89]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Oddity and the ‘confusion effect’ in predation , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[90]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[91]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[92]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[93]  D. Chitty,et al.  The natural selection of self-regulatory behaviour in animal populations , 1967 .

[94]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[95]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .