SARS-CoV-2 escape in vitro from a highly neutralizing COVID-19 convalescent plasma

To investigate the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in the immune population, we co-incubated authentic virus with a highly neutralizing plasma from a COVID-19 convalescent patient. The plasma fully neutralized the virus for 7 passages, but after 45 days, the deletion of F140 in the spike N-terminal domain (NTD) N3 loop led to partial breakthrough. At day 73, an E484K substitution in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) occurred, followed at day 80 by an insertion in the NTD N5 loop containing a new glycan sequon, which generated a variant completely resistant to plasma neutralization. Computational modeling predicts that the deletion and insertion in loops N3 and N5 prevent binding of neutralizing antibodies. The recent emergence in the United Kingdom and South Africa of natural variants with similar changes suggests that SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to escape an effective immune response and that vaccines and antibodies able to control emerging variants should be developed. One Sentence Summary Three mutations allowed SARS-CoV-2 to evade the polyclonal antibody response of a highly neutralizing COVID-19 convalescent plasma.

[1]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  The roles of glycans in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein , 2022, Biophysical Journal.

[2]  Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond,et al.  Emergence and rapid spread of a new severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) lineage with multiple spike mutations in South Africa , 2020, medRxiv.

[3]  Lei Huang,et al.  AI-Driven Multiscale Simulations Illuminate Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Dynamics , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  Gaurav D. Gaiha,et al.  Persistence and Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in an Immunocompromised Host , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Min Zheng,et al.  A systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates , 2020, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[6]  G. Atwal,et al.  REGN-COV2 antibodies prevent and treat SARS-CoV-2 infection in rhesus macaques and hamsters , 2020, Science.

[7]  Extremely potent human monoclonal antibodies from convalescent Covid-19 patients , 2020, bioRxiv.

[8]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  Beyond Shielding: The Roles of Glycans in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein , 2020, ACS central science.

[9]  F. Krammer SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development , 2020, Nature.

[10]  J. Sivaraman,et al.  Structural Basis of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV Antibody Interactions , 2020, Trends in Immunology.

[11]  Y. Wang,et al.  The flexibility of ACE2 in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection , 2020, bioRxiv.

[12]  Benjamin P. Kellman,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Infection Depends on Cellular Heparan Sulfate and ACE2 , 2020, Cell.

[13]  Sarah K. Hilton,et al.  Complete Mapping of Mutations to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain that Escape Antibody Recognition , 2020, bioRxiv.

[14]  M. Catanzaro,et al.  Molecular features of IGHV3-53-encoded antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[15]  Ralf Bartenschlager,et al.  Structures and distributions of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins on intact virions , 2020, Nature.

[16]  S. Nakagawa,et al.  Genome evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and its virological characteristics. , 2020, Inflammation and regeneration.

[17]  J. Diedrich,et al.  Structural analysis of full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein from an advanced vaccine candidate , 2020, bioRxiv.

[18]  P. Rocchi,et al.  Coronavirus RNA Proofreading: Molecular Basis and Therapeutic Targeting , 2020, Molecular Cell.

[19]  Yi Wang,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD. , 2020, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  Nguyen H. Tran,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial , 2020, The Lancet.

[21]  Lisa E. Gralinski,et al.  Potently neutralizing and protective human antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Nature.

[22]  J. Mascola,et al.  An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Benjamin P. Kellman,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Infection Depends on Cellular Heparan Sulfate and ACE2 , 2020, bioRxiv.

[24]  Qiang Zhou,et al.  A neutralizing human antibody binds to the N-terminal domain of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Science.

[25]  G. Atwal,et al.  Antibody cocktail to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein prevents rapid mutational escape seen with individual antibodies , 2020, Science.

[26]  D. Burton,et al.  Isolation of potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and protection from disease in a small animal model , 2020, Science.

[27]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  Beyond Shielding: The Roles of Glycans in SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein , 2020, bioRxiv.

[28]  Ilya J. Finkelstein,et al.  Structure-based Design of Prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 Spikes , 2020, bioRxiv.

[29]  A. Manenti,et al.  Evaluation of SARS‐CoV‐2 neutralizing antibodies using a CPE‐based colorimetric live virus micro‐neutralization assay in human serum samples , 2020, Journal of medical virology.

[30]  Daniel Wrapp,et al.  Site-specific glycan analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike , 2020, Science.

[31]  Asif Shajahan,et al.  Deducing the N- and O-glycosylation profile of the spike protein of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Glycobiology.

[32]  K. Yuen,et al.  Structural and Functional Basis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Using Human ACE2 , 2020, Cell.

[33]  Asif Shajahan,et al.  Deducing the N- and O-glycosylation profile of the spike protein of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, bioRxiv.

[34]  C. Hillyer,et al.  Neutralizing Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and Other Human Coronaviruses , 2020, Trends in Immunology.

[35]  Linqi Zhang,et al.  Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor , 2020, Nature.

[36]  A. Walls,et al.  Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein , 2020, Cell.

[37]  Qiang Zhou,et al.  Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2 , 2020, Science.

[38]  Rommie E. Amaro,et al.  Human Influenza A Virus Hemagglutinin Glycan Evolution Follows a Temporal Pattern to a Glycan Limit , 2019, mBio.

[39]  Nico Pfeifer,et al.  Safety and anti-viral activity of combination HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies in viremic individuals , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[40]  Alexis Rohou,et al.  cisTEM: User-friendly software for single-particle image processing , 2017, bioRxiv.

[41]  Yuelong Shu,et al.  GISAID: Global initiative on sharing all influenza data – from vision to reality , 2017, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[42]  David J. Fleet,et al.  cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination , 2017, Nature Methods.

[43]  Stefan Elbe,et al.  Data, disease and diplomacy: GISAID's innovative contribution to global health , 2017, Global challenges.

[44]  B. L. de Groot,et al.  CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins , 2016, Nature Methods.

[45]  W. Kong,et al.  N463 Glycosylation Site on V5 Loop of a Mutant gp120 Regulates the Sensitivity of HIV-1 to Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies VRC01/03 , 2015, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[46]  Jing Huang,et al.  CHARMM36 all‐atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[47]  J. Nie,et al.  A systematic study of the N-glycosylation sites of HIV-1 envelope protein on infectivity and antibody-mediated neutralization , 2013, Retrovirology.

[48]  Jan H. Jensen,et al.  PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical pKa Predictions. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[49]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  CHARMM Additive All-Atom Force Field for Glycosidic Linkages between Hexopyranoses. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[50]  Bette Korber,et al.  Tracking global patterns of N-linked glycosylation site variation in highly variable viral glycoproteins: HIV, SIV, and HCV envelopes and influenza hemagglutinin. , 2004, Glycobiology.

[51]  M Kundi,et al.  One-hit models for virus inactivation studies. , 1999, Antiviral research.

[52]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[53]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[54]  M. Klein,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms , 1994 .

[55]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[57]  D. Ermak,et al.  Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions , 1978 .

[58]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .