Effects of disparity on visual discomfort caused by short-term stereoscopic viewing based on electroencephalograph analysis

BackgroundDiscomfort evoked by stereoscopic depth has been widely concerned. Previous studies have proposed a comfortable disparity range and considered that disparities exceed this range would cause visual discomfort. Brain activity recordings including Electroencephalograph (EEG) monitoring enable better understanding of perceptual and cognitive processes related to stereo depth-induced visual comfort.MethodsEEG data was collected using a stereo-visual evoked potential (VEP) test system by providing visual stimulus to subjects aged from 21 to 25 with normal stereoscopic vision. For each type of visual stimulus, data were processed using directed transfer function (DTF) and adaptive directed transfer function (ADTF) in combination with subjective feedbacks (comfort or discomfort). The topographies of information flow were constructed to compare responses stimulated by different stereoscopic depth, and to determine the difference in comfort and discomfort situations upon stimulation with same stereoscopic depth.ResultsBased on EEG analysis results, we found that the occipital P270 was moderately related to the disparity. Moreover, the ADTF of P270 showed that the information flows at frontal lobe and central-parietal lobe changed when stimulation with different stereoscopic depth applied. As to the stereo images with same stereoscopic depth, the DTF outflows at the temporal and temporal-parietal lobes in δ band, central and central-parietal lobes in α and θ bands, and the comparison of inflows in these three bands could be considered as discriminated indexes for matching the stereoscopic effect with viewers’ comfort or discomfort state impacted by disparity. The subjective feedbacks indicated that the comfort judgments remained as a result of cumulative effect.ConclusionsThis study proposed a short-term stereo-VEP experiment that shorted the duration of each stimulus in the experimental scheme to minimize the interference from other factors except the disparity. The occipital P270 had a mid-relevance to the disparity and its ADTF showed the affected areas when viewers are receiving stimulations with different disparities. DTF could be considered as discriminated indexes for matching the stereoscopic effect with viewers’ comfort or discomfort state induced by disparity. This study proposed a preferable experiment to observe the single effect of disparity and provided an intuitive and easy-to-read result in a more convenient manner.

[1]  Mtm Marc Lambooij,et al.  Visual Discomfort and Visual Fatigue of Stereoscopic Displays: A Review , 2009 .

[2]  Keetaek Kham,et al.  Measurement of 3D Visual Fatigue Using Event-Related Potential (ERP): 3D Oddball Paradigm , 2008, 2008 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video.

[3]  Kang Yue,et al.  P-34: Compare and Model Multi-level Stereoscopic 3D Visual Fatigue Based on EEG , 2017 .

[4]  Tao Yin,et al.  Preliminary Study on EEG-Based Analysis of Discomfort Caused by Watching 3D Images , 2015 .

[5]  Jérémy Frey,et al.  Classifying EEG Signals during Stereoscopic Visualization to Estimate Visual Comfort , 2015, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[6]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Connectome : A MATLAB toolbox for mapping and imaging of brain , 2010 .

[7]  Yongtian Wang,et al.  EEG-Based Assessment of Stereoscopic 3D Visual Fatigue Caused by Vergence-Accommodation Conflict , 2015, Journal of Display Technology.

[8]  Kun Li,et al.  Assessment visual fatigue of watching 3DTV using EEG power spectral parameters , 2014, Displays.

[9]  A. Revonsuo,et al.  Timing of the earliest ERP correlate of visual awareness. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Jérémy Frey,et al.  Assessing the zone of comfort in stereoscopic displays using EEG , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  S. Bender,et al.  The topography of the scalp-recorded visual N700 , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  The Temporal Responses of Neurons in The Primary Visual Cortex to Transient Stimuli*: The Temporal Responses of Neurons in The Primary Visual Cortex to Transient Stimuli* , 2013 .

[13]  Jinguo Liu,et al.  An Interactive Astronaut-Robot System with Gesture Control , 2016, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[14]  F. Shawkat,et al.  A study of the effects of contrast change on pattern VEPs, and the transition between onset, reversal and offset modes of stimulation , 2000, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[15]  David M. Hoffman,et al.  The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[16]  Stephan Bender,et al.  Am I safe? The ventrolateral prefrontal cortex ‘detects’ when an unpleasant event does not occur , 2007, NeuroImage.

[17]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain , 2006 .

[18]  Song Gao,et al.  Preliminary fMRI research of the human brain activation under stereoscopic vision , 2013 .

[19]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  Localization of ictal onset zones in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome using directional connectivity analysis of intracranial electroencephalography , 2011, Seizure.

[20]  Aamir Saeed Malik,et al.  EEG based evaluation of stereoscopic 3D displays for viewer discomfort , 2015, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[21]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  The role of the posterior parietal cortex in stereopsis and hand-eye coordination during motor task behaviours , 2014, Cognitive Processing.

[22]  Rodrick Wallace,et al.  Pathologies in functional connectivity, feedback control and robustness: a global workspace perspective on autism spectrum disorders , 2014, Cognitive Processing.

[23]  Bin He,et al.  Estimation of Time-Varying Connectivity Patterns Through the Use of an Adaptive Directed Transfer Function , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Min-Koo Kang,et al.  A wellness platform for stereoscopic 3D video systems using EEG-based visual discomfort evaluation technology. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  Gregory A. Worrell,et al.  Ictal source analysis: Localization and imaging of causal interactions in humans , 2007, NeuroImage.

[26]  Hang-Bong Kang,et al.  The measurement of eyestrain caused from diverse binocular disparities, viewing time and display sizes in watching stereoscopic 3D content , 2012, 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.

[27]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Min-Chul Park,et al.  SSVEP and ERP measurement of cognitive fatigue caused by stereoscopic 3D , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Towards a Physiology-Based Measure of Visual Discomfort: Brain Activity Measurement While Viewing Stereoscopic Images With Different Screen Disparities , 2015, Journal of Display Technology.

[30]  The influence of Mozart's sonata K.448 on visual attention: An ERPs study , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Identification of epileptogenic foci from causal analysis of ECoG interictal spike activity , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  S. Luck,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.