Lowering the potential barrier of a bistable energy harvester with mechanically rectified motion of an auxiliary magnet oscillator

In this study, we propose a bistable energy harvester with an auxiliary magnet oscillator (BEH-O), whose motion is mechanically rectified to enhance its broadband energy harvesting performance. The design of the proposed BEH-O system is based on local modification of the double-well potential. The auxiliary oscillator with the mechanical rectifier is designed in such a manner that its rectified half-sine motion tends to reduce the saddle barrier of restoring potential, leading to a possibility of an easier escape from the potential well, while keeping other parts of the potential, thereby maintaining high-energy orbital motion. Consequently, the lower bound of the operating frequency band of the BEH-O is reduced, when compared to its conventional counterpart, i.e., conventional bistable energy harvester (CBEH), while its upper bound remains unchanged. Such a broader frequency band of the BEH-O can be directly compared with that of the CBEH, as there is little difference in the high-energy orbital motion between the two. This beneficial effect of the BEH-O system is theoretically and experimentally supported by bifurcation analyses and frequency response analyses.In this study, we propose a bistable energy harvester with an auxiliary magnet oscillator (BEH-O), whose motion is mechanically rectified to enhance its broadband energy harvesting performance. The design of the proposed BEH-O system is based on local modification of the double-well potential. The auxiliary oscillator with the mechanical rectifier is designed in such a manner that its rectified half-sine motion tends to reduce the saddle barrier of restoring potential, leading to a possibility of an easier escape from the potential well, while keeping other parts of the potential, thereby maintaining high-energy orbital motion. Consequently, the lower bound of the operating frequency band of the BEH-O is reduced, when compared to its conventional counterpart, i.e., conventional bistable energy harvester (CBEH), while its upper bound remains unchanged. Such a broader frequency band of the BEH-O can be directly compared with that of the CBEH, as there is little difference in the high-energy orbital motion b...

[1]  Young-Jin Kim,et al.  Phase-dependent dynamic potential of magnetically coupled two-degree-of-freedom bistable energy harvester , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Pilkee Kim,et al.  Resonant behaviors of a nonlinear cantilever beam with tip mass subject to an axial force and electrostatic excitation , 2012 .

[3]  Sihong Zhao,et al.  Electroelastic modeling and experimental validations of piezoelectric energy harvesting from broadband random vibrations of cantilevered bimorphs , 2012 .

[4]  K. W. Wang,et al.  Concise and high-fidelity predictive criteria for maximizing performance and robustness of bistable energy harvesters , 2013 .

[5]  Pilkee Kim,et al.  Triple-well potential with a uniform depth: Advantageous aspects in designing a multi-stable energy harvester , 2016 .

[6]  Yong-Jin Yoon,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic analyses on a magnetopiezoelastic energy harvester with reversible hysteresis , 2016 .

[7]  A. Erturk,et al.  On the Role of Nonlinearities in Vibratory Energy Harvesting: A Critical Review and Discussion , 2014 .

[8]  Muhammad R. Hajj,et al.  Global nonlinear distributed-parameter model of parametrically excited piezoelectric energy harvesters , 2012 .

[9]  Pilkee Kim,et al.  Dynamic and energetic characteristics of a tri-stable magnetopiezoelastic energy harvester , 2015 .

[10]  Marco P. Soares dos Santos,et al.  Magnetic levitation-based electromagnetic energy harvesting: a semi-analytical non-linear model for energy transduction , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Ryan L. Harne,et al.  A review of the recent research on vibration energy harvesting via bistable systems , 2013 .

[12]  B. Mann,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics for broadband energy harvesting: Investigation of a bistable piezoelectric inertial generator , 2010 .

[13]  Jeehyun Jung,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic and energetic characteristics of piezoelectric energy harvester with two rotatable external magnets , 2015 .

[14]  M. Meyyappan,et al.  Floating Oscillator-Embedded Triboelectric Generator for Versatile Mechanical Energy Harvesting , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Lihong Zhang,et al.  Portable Wind Energy Harvesters for Low-Power Applications: A Survey , 2016, Sensors.

[16]  Marco Ferrari,et al.  A single-magnet nonlinear piezoelectric converter for enhanced energy harvesting from random vibrations ☆ , 2011 .

[17]  Wei Wang,et al.  Influence of potential well depth on nonlinear tristable energy harvesting , 2015 .

[18]  Brian P. Mann,et al.  Investigations of a nonlinear energy harvester with a bistable potential well , 2010 .

[19]  Sheng-Bo Fan,et al.  An elastic-support model for enhanced bistable piezoelectric energy harvesting from random vibrations , 2015 .

[20]  Junyi Cao,et al.  Broadband tristable energy harvester: Modeling and experiment verification , 2014 .

[21]  Yonggang Leng,et al.  Performance of bistable piezoelectric cantilever vibration energy harvesters with an elastic support external magnet , 2014 .

[22]  Marco Ferrari,et al.  Piezoelectric buckled beams for random vibration energy harvesting , 2012 .

[23]  L. Gammaitoni,et al.  Nonlinear energy harvesting. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[24]  D. Inman,et al.  Broadband piezoelectric power generation on high-energy orbits of the bistable Duffing oscillator with electromechanical coupling , 2011 .

[25]  D. Inman,et al.  Nonlinear piezoelectricity in electroelastic energy harvesters: Modeling and experimental identification , 2010 .

[26]  Alper Erturk,et al.  Enhanced broadband piezoelectric energy harvesting using rotatable magnets , 2013 .

[27]  Pilkee Kim,et al.  A multi-stable energy harvester: Dynamic modeling and bifurcation analysis , 2014 .