Indirect effects in ecological interaction networks. I. The chain rule approach.

A mathematical method for evaluating indirect effects propagated through ecosystems consisting of multiple species is developed. The time-backward expansion of the sensitivity matrix of a system at steady state represents the tracking back of the total effects received by species. Aggregating those portions of the total effect between two species that travel through a common path with various schedules gives the path partitioning of the total effect. From this path partitioning, a chain rule is derived that expresses the indirect effect transmitted through an individual path as the products of direct effects associated with the links constituting the path. The evaluation of indirect effects by this chain rule is applied to example systems to reveal the entire structure of influence propagation through the systems. The results of this application suggest three basic mechanisms through which indirect effects contribute to the complexity and contingency of species interactions: (i) the globalization of influence by bundles of long indirect paths, (ii) the amplification (or reduction) of effects by positive (or negative) cycles, and (iii) the alteration in sign of interactions between a pair of species due to the change in dominance among the effects carried by parallel paths connecting the species.

[1]  Mark A. McPeek,et al.  Predation, Competition, and Prey Communities: A Review of Field Experiments , 1985 .

[2]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  PREDICTING DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH USING EXPERIMENTS AND PATH ANALYSIS' , 1994 .

[3]  Ronald R. Mohler,et al.  Theory and applications of variable structure systems , 1972 .

[4]  P. Astor.  15 – The Sensitivity Substructure of Ecosystems , 1976 .

[5]  R Levins,et al.  DISCUSSION PAPER: THE QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARTIALLY SPECIFIED SYSTEMS , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[8]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Community Food Webs: Data and Theory , 1990 .

[9]  B. C. Patten.  Environs: Relativistic Elementary Particles for Ecology , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Foraging Time Optimization and Interactions in Food Webs , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Indirect effects in ecological interaction networks. II. The conjugate variable approach. , 1995, Mathematical biosciences.

[12]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[13]  W. Leak,et al.  Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology , 1974 .

[14]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Perturbation Experiments in Community Ecology: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[15]  Bernard C. Patten,et al.  Dominance of Indirect Causality in Ecosystems , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[16]  R. Holt.  Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[17]  Stephen H. Levine,et al.  Competitive Interactions in Ecosystems , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[18]  P. Abrams.  Functional Responses of Optimal Foragers , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[19]  P. Yodzis.  The Indeterminacy of Ecological Interactions as Perceived Through Perturbation Experiments , 1988 .

[20]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[21]  Robert W. Bosserman,et al.  17 – Propagation of Cause in Ecosystems , 1976 .

[22]  John Vandermeer,et al.  Indirect Mutualism: Variations on a Theme by Stephen Levine , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[23]  Hisao Nakajima,et al.  Sensitivity and stability of flow networks , 1992 .

[24]  Bernard C. Patten,et al.  Further aspects of the analysis of indirect effects in ecosystems , 1986 .

[25]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities , 1988 .