The search for the hydrophobic force law.

After nearly 30 years of research on the hydrophobic interaction, the search for the hydrophobic force law is still continuing. Indeed, there are more questions than answers, and the experimental data are often quite different for nominally similar conditions, as well as, apparently, for nano-, micro-, and macroscopic surfaces. This has led to the conclusion that the experimentally observed force-distance relationships are either a combination of different 'fundamental' interactions, or that the hydrophobic force-law, if there is one, is complex--depending on numerous parameters. The only unexpectedly strong attractive force measured in all experiments so far has a range of D approximately 100-200 angstroms, increasing roughly exponentially down to approximately 10-20 angstroms and then more steeply down to adhesive contact at D = 0 or, for power-law potentials, effectively at D approximately 2 angstroms. The measured forces in this regime (100-200 angstroms) and especially the adhesive forces are much stronger, and have a different distance-dependence from the continuum VDW force (Lifshitz theory) for non-conducting dielectric media. We suggest a three-regime force-law for the forces observed between hydrophobic surfaces: In the first, from 100-200 angstroms to thousands of angstroms, the dominating force is created by complementary electrostatic domains or patches on the apposing surfaces and/or bridging vapour cavities; a 'pure' but still not well-understood 'long-range hydrophobic force' dominates the second regime from approximately 150 to approximately 15 angstroms, possibly due to an enhanced Hamaker constant associated with the 'proton-hopping' polarizability of water; while below approximately 10-15 anstroms to contact there is another 'pure short-range hydrophobic force' related to water structuring effects associated with surface-induced changes in the orientation and/or density of water molecules and H-bonds at the water-hydrophobic interface. We present recent SFA and other experimental results, as well as a simplified model for water based on a spherically-symmetric potential that is able to capture some basic features of hydrophobic association. Such a model may be useful for theoretical studies of the HI over the broad range of scales observed in SFA experiments.

[1]  N. Ishida,et al.  Nano Bubbles on a Hydrophobic Surface in Water Observed by Tapping-Mode Atomic Force Microscopy , 2000 .

[2]  M Scott Shell,et al.  The relative entropy is fundamental to multiscale and inverse thermodynamic problems. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  The influence of temperature on pairwise hydrophobic interactions of methane‐like particles: A molecular dynamics study of free energy , 1996 .

[4]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[5]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Recent progress in understanding hydrophobic interactions , 2006 .

[6]  Barry W. Ninham,et al.  Effect of divalent electrolyte on the hydrophobic attraction , 1990 .

[7]  Derek Y. C. Chan,et al.  The drainage of thin liquid films between solid surfaces , 1985 .

[8]  R. Sharma,et al.  Interaction forces between hydrophobic mica surfaces , 1995 .

[9]  H. Christenson,et al.  Direct Measurements of the Force between Hydrophobic Surfaces in Water , 2001 .

[10]  Softened hydrophobic attraction between macroscopic surfaces in relative motion. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  Berg,et al.  Multicanonical ensemble: A new approach to simulate first-order phase transitions. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[12]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Further studies on the effect of degassing on the dispersion and stability of surfactant-free emulsions. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[13]  R. Sharma,et al.  Preparation of a Robust Hydrophobic Monolayer on Mica , 1994 .

[14]  M Scott Shell,et al.  Anomalous waterlike behavior in spherically-symmetric water models optimized with the relative entropy. , 2009, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[15]  Phil Attard,et al.  Atomic Force Microscope Images of Nanobubbles on a Hydrophobic Surface and Corresponding Force-Separation Data , 2002 .

[16]  Hiroyuki Sugimura,et al.  Scanning probe nanofabrication of chemically active areas on substrate covered with organosilane monolayers , 1997 .

[17]  V. Craig,et al.  Study of the Long-Range Hydrophobic Attraction in Concentrated Salt Solutions and Its Implications for Electrostatic Models , 1998 .

[18]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  A possible hydrodynamic origin of the forces of hydrophobic attraction , 1991 .

[19]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Measurement of the hydrophobic interaction between two hydrophobic surfaces in aqueous electrolyte solutions , 1984 .

[20]  Phil Attard,et al.  BUBBLES, CAVITIES, AND THE LONG-RANGED ATTRACTION BETWEEN HYDROPHOBIC SURFACES , 1994 .

[21]  B. Liedberg,et al.  Influence of Wetting Properties on the Long-Range “Hydrophobic” Interaction between Self-Assembled Alkylthiolate Monolayers , 2000 .

[22]  M. Hato.  Attractive Forces between Surfaces of Controlled “Hydrophobicity” across Water: A Possible Range of “Hydrophobic Interactions” between Macroscopic Hydrophobic Surfaces across Water† , 1996 .

[23]  H. Christenson,et al.  Forces between fluorocarbon surfactant monolayers: salt effects on the hydrophobic interaction , 1989 .

[24]  Phil Attard,et al.  Nanobubbles: the big picture , 2002 .

[25]  V. Craig,et al.  Effect of Dissolved Gas and Salt on the Hydrophobic Force between Polypropylene Surfaces , 1994 .

[26]  C. Brinker,et al.  Superhydrophobicity: Drying transition of confined water , 2006, Nature.

[27]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Optimized intermolecular potential functions for liquid hydrocarbons , 1984 .

[28]  Charles F. Zukoski,et al.  Interactions between hydrophobic self-assembled monolayers. Effect of salt and the chemical potential of water on adhesion , 1998 .

[29]  J. L. Parker,et al.  Surface forces between plasma polymer films , 1994 .

[30]  J. L. Parker,et al.  Comment on "Interactions between hydrophobic surfaces. Dependence on temperature and alkyl chain length" , 1992 .

[31]  Masanobu Sakamoto,et al.  Attraction between hydrophobic surfaces with and without gas phase , 2000 .

[32]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  The influence of dissolved gas on the interactions between surfaces of different hydrophobicity in aqueous media Part I. Measurement of interaction forces , 1999 .

[33]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Recent advances in the surface forces apparatus (SFA) technique , 2010 .

[34]  H. Chan,et al.  Temperature dependence of hydrophobic interactions: A mean force perspective , 2000 .

[35]  H. Christenson.  Phase behaviour in slits—when tight cracks stay wet , 1997 .

[36]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Interaction forces between colloidal particles in liquid: theory and experiment. , 2007, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[37]  D. F. Evans,et al.  Interactions between hydrophobic surfaces. Dependence on temperature and alkyl chain length , 1991 .

[38]  R. Hayes,et al.  Forces Measured between Latex Spheres in Aqueous Electrolyte: Non-DLVO Behavior and Sensitivity to Dissolved Gas , 1999 .

[39]  P. Attard.  Bridging Bubbles between Hydrophobic Surfaces , 1996 .

[40]  John L. Parker,et al.  Hydrophobic attraction: a reexamination of electrolyte effects , 1992 .

[41]  James W. G. Tyrrell,et al.  Images of nanobubbles on hydrophobic surfaces and their interactions. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[42]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  The hydrophobic interaction is long range, decaying exponentially with distance , 1982, Nature.

[43]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Origin of the long-range attraction between surfactant-coated surfaces. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  J. Klein,et al.  Long-range attraction between charge-mosaic surfaces across water. , 2006, Physical review letters.