Low Rectal Cancer: Classification and Standardization of Surgery

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of low rectal cancer is controversial, and one of the reasons is the lack of definition and standardization of surgery in low rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: We classified low rectal cancers in 4 groups with the aim of demonstrating that most patients with low rectal cancer can receive conservative surgery without compromising oncologic outcome. DESIGN: Patients with low rectal cancer <6 cm from anal verge were defined in 4 groups: type I (supra-anal tumors: >1 cm from anal ring) had coloanal anastomosis, type II (juxta-anal tumors: <1 cm from anal ring) had partial intersphincteric resection, type III (intra-anal tumors: internal anal sphincter invasion) had total intersphincteric resection, and type IV (transanal tumors: external anal sphincter invasion) had abdominoperineal resection. Patients with ultra-low sphincter-preserving surgery (types II-III) were compared with those with conventional sphincter-preserving surgery (type I). OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative mortality, morbidity, surgical margins, local and distant recurrence, and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 404 patients with low rectal cancer, 135 were type I, 131 type II, 55 type III, and 83 type IV. There was no difference in local recurrence (5% to 9% vs 6%), distant recurrence (23% vs 23%), and disease-free survival (70%-73% vs 68%) at 5 years between ultra-low (types II-III) and conventional (type I) sphincter-preserving surgery. Predictive factors of survival were tumor stage and R1 resection but not the type of tumor or type of surgery. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the retrospective analysis of a database, obtained from a single institution and covering a 16-year period. CONCLUSION: Classification of low rectal cancers and standardization of surgery permitted sphincter-preserving surgery in 79% of patients with low rectal cancer without compromising oncologic outcome. This new surgical classification should be used to standardize surgery and increase sphincter-preserving surgery in low rectal cancer.

[1]  F. Zerbib,et al.  Sphincter-Saving Resection for All Rectal Carcinomas: The End of the 2-cm Distal Rule , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[2]  T. Fitzgerald,et al.  Pushing the envelope beyond a centimeter in rectal cancer: oncologic implications of close, but negative margins. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  Hein Putter,et al.  Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  P. Tekkis,et al.  Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer , 2007, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[5]  J. Macfarlane,et al.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997. , 1998, Archives of surgery.

[6]  F. Zerbib,et al.  Risk Factors for Fecal Incontinence After Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer , 2011, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[7]  V. Fazio,et al.  Total mesorectal excision is not necessary for cancers of the upper rectum. , 1998, Surgery.

[8]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  Circumferential Margin Involvement Is Still an Important Predictor of Local Recurrence in Rectal Carcinoma: Not One Millimeter but Two Millimeters Is the Limit , 2002, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[9]  K. Shirouzu,et al.  Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter‐preserving surgery , 1995, Cancer.

[10]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  B. Moran,et al.  Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. , 2006, Techniques in coloproctology.

[12]  T. Fitzgerald,et al.  Pushing the envelope beyond a centimeter in rectal cancer: Oncologic implications of close but negative margins. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  P. Quirke,et al.  One millimetre is the safe cut‐off for magnetic resonance imaging prediction of surgical margin status in rectal cancer , 2011, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  J. Saric,et al.  Preoperative Radiochemotherapy and Sphincter-Saving Resection for T3 Carcinomas of the Lower Third of the Rectum , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[15]  P. Quirke,et al.  The Modern Abdominoperineal Excision: The Next Challenge After Total Mesorectal Excision , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[16]  F. Leblanc,et al.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Long-Term Oncologic Results , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[17]  K. Bujko,et al.  Does rectal cancer shrinkage induced by preoperative radio(chemo)therapy increase the likelihood of anterior resection? A systematic review of randomised trials. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  H. Thaler,et al.  Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[19]  A. Parks,et al.  Resection and sutured colo‐anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma , 1982, The British journal of surgery.

[20]  M. Ychou,et al.  Restorative and Nonrestorative Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer After High-Dose Radiation , 2002, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[21]  K. Goodman,et al.  Sphincter Preservation in Low Rectal Cancer is Facilitated by Preoperative Chemoradiation and Intersphincteric Dissection , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[22]  P. Quirke,et al.  Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  D. Forman,et al.  Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene? , 2008, Gut.

[24]  G. Beets,et al.  Local staging of rectal cancer: A review of imaging , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  D. Sebag‐Montefiore,et al.  Sphincter saving is the primary objective for local treatment of cancer of the lower rectum. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[26]  Rainer Fietkau,et al.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  H. Heneghan,et al.  Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[28]  Gina Brown,et al.  Defining the surgical planes on MRI improves surgery for cancer of the low rectum. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  N. Baxter,et al.  Variability in Reconstructive Procedures Following Rectal Cancer Surgery in the United States , 2010, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[30]  J. Guillem,et al.  Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer with preoperative radiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis: long term follow-up. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  J. Saric,et al.  Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer , 1999, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[32]  Wendy Frankel,et al.  Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinomas of the colon and rectum. , 2008, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[33]  B. Téleky,et al.  Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[34]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.