The use of artificial neural networks to predict delayed discharge and readmission in enhanced recovery following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery

AbstractBackground Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can be used to develop predictive tools to enable the clinical decision-making process. This study aimed to investigate the use of an ANN in predicting the outcomes from enhanced recovery after colorectal cancer surgery.MethodsData were obtained from consecutive colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery within the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program between 2002 and 2009 in a single center. The primary outcomes assessed were delayed discharge and readmission within a 30-day period. The data were analyzed using a multilayered perceptron neural network (MLPNN), and a prediction tools were created for each outcome. The results were compared with a conventional statistical method using logistic regression analysis.ResultsA total of 275 cancer patients were included in the study. The median length of stay was 6 days (range 2–49 days) with 67 patients (24.4 %) staying longer than 7 days. Thirty-four patients (12.5 %) were readmitted within 30 days. Important factors predicting delayed discharge were related to failure in compliance with ERAS, particularly with the postoperative elements in the first 48 h. The MLPNN for delayed discharge had an area under a receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.817, compared with an AUROC of 0.807 for the predictive tool developed from logistic regression analysis. Factors predicting 30-day readmission included overall compliance with the ERAS pathway and receiving neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. The MLPNN for readmission had an AUROC of 0.68.ConclusionsThese results may plausibly suggest that ANN can be used to develop reliable outcome predictive tools in multifactorial intervention such as ERAS. Compliance with ERAS can reliably predict both delayed discharge and 30-day readmission following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

[1]  K. Lassen,et al.  Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme , 2009, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  R. Bleichrodt,et al.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Versus Conventional Postoperative Care in Colorectal Surgery , 2009, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[3]  K. Lassen,et al.  A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  L. Påhlman,et al.  Adverse effects of preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer: long-term follow-up of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  K. Misawa,et al.  Complications associated with postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy for advanced rectal cancer. , 2014, International surgery.

[6]  N. Francis,et al.  Deviation and failure of enhanced recovery after surgery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: early prediction model , 2012, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[7]  M. Solomon,et al.  A Qualitative Study Assessing the Barriers to Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , 2014, World Journal of Surgery.

[8]  Editorial comment on: development, validation, and head-to-head comparison of logistic regression-based nomograms and artificial neural network models predicting prostate cancer on initial extended biopsy. , 2008, European urology.

[9]  L. Bottaci,et al.  Artificial neural networks applied to outcome prediction for colorectal cancer patients in separate institutions , 1997, The Lancet.

[10]  R. Andersson Artificial Neural Networks: Useful Aid in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[11]  Robert L. Grossman,et al.  Data Mining for Scientific and Engineering Applications , 2001, Massive Computing.

[12]  J. Griffith,et al.  Short‐term outcome following elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in octogenarians and nonagenarians , 2012, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[13]  J. Macfie,et al.  Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols – compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery , 2012, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[14]  Hao-Yun Kao,et al.  Predicting quality of life after breast cancer surgery using ANN-based models: performance comparison with MR , 2013, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[15]  Olle Ljungqvist,et al.  The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2010, Clinical nutrition.

[16]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[17]  P. Ewings,et al.  Factors predicting deviation from an enhanced recovery programme and delayed discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery , 2012, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[18]  Hon-Yi Shi,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Model for Predicting 5-Year Mortality After Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma : A Nationwide Study , 2012 .

[19]  Jacek M. Zurada,et al.  Introduction to artificial neural systems , 1992 .

[20]  M. Braga,et al.  Enhanced Recovery Program in Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2014, World Journal of Surgery.

[21]  J V Tu,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  Kathleen Steinhöfel,et al.  Artificial intelligence in medicine , 1989 .