The recognition potential reflects an intermediate level of visual representation

A well-known event-related potential (ERP) component-the recognition potential (RP) is a response to recognizable stimuli, peaking at around 200-250 ms. The aim of the present study is to put to the test the contrasting perceptual and semantic accounts of the RP, with manipulation of word meaning and presentation format of stimuli. The hypothesis was that RP latencies would be observed to increase with the difficulty of identification in presentation formats in accord with both accounts and the present study would replicate the semantic effect independently of the perceptual manipulations. The stimuli were Chinese characters and presented to native speakers. The data yielded a negative component (RP) at around 250 ms for all formats of real characters and pseudocharacters at parietooccipital electrodes. The RP for real characters was larger in normal formats than in mirror formats and the RP for pseudocharacters was greater in normal-upright format than other formats. However, a significant RP latency difference was observed between real characters and pseudocharacters. It seems that our data could not be taken as evidence for semantic processing account. We suggest that the RP is a reflection of intermediate visual representation which integrates information from various pathways and then achieve word form analysis. When word form analysis becomes difficult, the categorical feature of word form contributes to word recognition.

[1]  F. Rubia,et al.  Common basal extrastriate areas for the semantic processing of words and pictures , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Rudell,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Wave Evidence for Automatic Processing of Orthographically Regular Letter Strings , 2000, Brain and Language.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  Computational mechanisms of object constancy for visual recognition revealed by event-related potentials , 2007, Vision Research.

[5]  A. Proverbio,et al.  Early involvement of the temporal area in attentional selection of grating orientation: an ERP study. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  M Martín-Loeches,et al.  An early electrophysiological sign of semantic processing in basal extrastriate areas. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[7]  F. Rubia,et al.  Functional differences in the semantic processing of concrete and abstract words , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Werner Sommer,et al.  ERP components reflecting stimulus identification: contrasting the recognition potential and the early repetition effect (N250r). , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  The recognition potential: semantic processing or the detection of differences between stimuli? , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  J A Hinojosa,et al.  Semantic processing of open- and closed-class words: an event-related potentials study. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations , 1998 .

[12]  M. A. Pozo,et al.  Studying semantics in the brain: the rapid stream stimulation paradigm. , 2001, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[13]  D. Tucker,et al.  Parametric analysis of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension: evidence for parallel brain mechanisms. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  Joseph Dien,et al.  The neurocognitive basis of reading single words as seen through early latency ERPs: A model of converging pathways , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[15]  G. Houghton,et al.  ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  The recognition potential and the word frequency effect at a high rate of word presentation. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Alan P. Rudell,et al.  The Recognition Potential and Reversed Letters , 2000, The International journal of neuroscience.

[18]  A. Rudell,et al.  Effects of target area and letter complexity on event-related potentials and reaction time. , 1999, The International journal of neuroscience.

[19]  J. Hinojosa,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of an early effect of sentence context in reading , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[20]  Qinglin Zhang,et al.  The recognition potential and rotated Chinese characters , 2008, Brain Research.

[21]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Localization in alexia. , 1994 .

[22]  J. Hinojosa,et al.  The recognition potential during sentence presentation: stimulus probability, background stimuli, and SOA. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[23]  Manuel Martín-Loeches,et al.  The gate for reading: Reflections on the recognition potential , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[24]  Miguel A. Pozo,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of automatic early semantic processing , 2004, Brain and Language.

[25]  A P Rudell,et al.  The recognition potential contrasted with the P300. , 1991, The International journal of neuroscience.

[26]  A P Rudell,et al.  The recognition potential, word difficulty, and individual reading ability: on using event-related potentials to study perception. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Ying Liu,et al.  Visual Analysis and Lexical Access of Chinese Characters by Chinese as Second Language Readers , 2006 .

[28]  A P Rudell,et al.  The recognition potential and conscious awareness. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  Manuel Martín-Loeches,et al.  The Recognition Potential: An ERP Index of Lexical Access , 1999, Brain and Language.

[30]  A. Paivio Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[31]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.