Mitotic spindle disruption in human preimplantation embryos activates the spindle assembly checkpoint but not apoptosis until Day 5 of development

STUDY QUESTION Is the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) active during human preimplantation development? SUMMARY ANSWER Mitotic spindle disruption during mitosis activates the SAC from at least Day 3 of human preimplantation development, but this does not lead to apoptosis until Day 5. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Human preimplantation embryos frequently acquire chromosomal abnormalities, but the mechanisms behind this are poorly understood. It has been speculated that a dysfunctional SAC could be responsible. Although research has shown that the SAC components are present during early human development, functional studies are lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION In vitro study using human preimplantation embryos in a university research laboratory. We studied a total of 38 Day-3, 38 Day-4, 29 Day-5 and 21 Day-6 human preimplantation embryos, donated for research, during 16 h of incubation. PARTICIPANT/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We cultured human preimplantation embryos overnight in a time-lapse imaging system, in control or in a nocodazole-containing medium that prevents the formation of a proper mitotic spindle. The embryos were subsequently fixed and analysed by immunocytochemistry for tubulin or mitotic and apoptotic markers, or by FISH. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE All embryos showed an increase in M-phase cells from 4.1-8.8% to 21.4-53.5% when exposed to nocodazole (P < 0.05; two-way ANOVA for all groups except Day-4 embryos, P = 0.128) suggesting SAC functionality. Apoptosis, which was rarely detected between Day 3 and Day 6 in good-quality control embryos, increased from Day 5 onwards in nocodazole-treated embryos and became statistically different from Day 6 (P < 0.01; two-way ANOVA). The FISH data suggest that in compacted Day-4 embryos, approximately one in six cells started a polyploid new cell cycle rather than to go in apoptosis after the failure to maintain the SAC-mediated M-phase arrest. These results suggest that during early embryo development, blastomeres with unresolved chromosome misalignments during M-phase can escape SAC-mediated apoptosis, continue cell division which can then result in aneuploid daughter cells. LARGE SCALE DATA Not applicable. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study used nocodazole to inhibit microtubule polymerization, a drug that is regularly used to induce metaphase arrest and SAC activation. Results should be extrapolated to naturally occurring chromosome misalignments with care. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our results provide functional data that can help explain the high aneuploidy rates seen in human cleavage-stage embryos and suggest that this is due to their unusual cell cycle control. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO) Vlaanderen) and the Methusalem grant to Karen Sermon of the Research Council of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

[1]  Parveen Kumar,et al.  Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential , 2016, Nature Communications.

[2]  M. Vera-Rodríguez,et al.  Prediction model for aneuploidy in early human embryo development revealed by single-cell analysis , 2015, Nature Communications.

[3]  R. Gilchrist,et al.  Chromosome constitution of human embryos generated after in vitro maturation including 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine in the oocyte collection medium. , 2015, Human reproduction.

[4]  P. Ho,et al.  Array comparative genomic hybridization analyses of all blastomeres of a cohort of embryos from young IVF patients revealed significant contribution of mitotic errors to embryo mosaicism at the cleavage stage , 2014, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.

[5]  Sue Biggins,et al.  Signalling dynamics in the spindle checkpoint response , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  C. Spits,et al.  Low-grade chromosomal mosaicism in human somatic and embryonic stem cell populations , 2014, Nature Communications.

[7]  Ruiqiang Li,et al.  Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[8]  K. Sermon,et al.  Evolution of aneuploidy up to Day 4 of human preimplantation development. , 2013, Human reproduction.

[9]  J. Guérin,et al.  Subcellular dynamics of the maternal cell death regulator BCL2L10 in human preimplantation embryos. , 2013, Human reproduction.

[10]  A. Ciliberto,et al.  The spindle-assembly checkpoint and the beauty of self-destruction , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  Sjoerd Repping,et al.  Molecular origin of mitotic aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos. , 2012, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[12]  H. Bousbaa,et al.  The spindle assembly checkpoint and aneuploidy , 2012 .

[13]  Farshid Moussavi,et al.  Dynamic blastomere behaviour reflects human embryo ploidy by the four-cell stage , 2012, Nature Communications.

[14]  J. Korevaar,et al.  Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review. , 2011, Human reproduction update.

[15]  S. Roh,et al.  Fragmentation of embryos is associated with both necrosis and apoptosis. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  Zhenbo Wang,et al.  Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Regulates Mitotic Cell Cycle Progression during Preimplantation Embryo Development , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  J. de Vos,et al.  Involvement of BCL2 family members in the regulation of human oocyte and early embryo survival and death: gene expression and beyond. , 2011, Reproduction.

[18]  J. Vermeesch,et al.  The Human Cleavage Stage Embryo Is a Cradle of Chromosomal Rearrangements , 2011, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[19]  D. Wells,et al.  Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation. , 2011, Human reproduction.

[20]  D. Wells,et al.  Aneuploidy in the Human Blastocyst , 2011, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[21]  T. Baer,et al.  Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  B. Fauser,et al.  The fate of the mosaic embryo: chromosomal constitution and development of Day 4, 5 and 8 human embryos. , 2010, Human reproduction.

[23]  M. Kurokawa,et al.  Stalling in mitosis and releasing the apoptotic brake , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[24]  P. Clarke,et al.  Phosphorylation of Mcl‐1 by CDK1–cyclin B1 initiates its Cdc20‐dependent destruction during mitotic arrest , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[25]  P. Haentjens,et al.  Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers. , 2009, Human reproduction.

[26]  T. Chambers,et al.  Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 1-Mediated Bcl-xL/Bcl-2 Phosphorylation Acts as a Functional Link Coupling Mitotic Arrest and Apoptosis , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[27]  Geert Verbeke,et al.  Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[28]  P. Devroey,et al.  Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[29]  H. Broxmeyer,et al.  Checkpoint-apoptosis uncoupling in human and mouse embryonic stem cells: a source of karyotpic instability. , 2007, Blood.

[30]  E. Salmon,et al.  The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  A. Thornhill,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies. , 2006, Human reproduction.

[32]  Conly L. Rieder,et al.  Mitotic Checkpoint Slippage in Humans Occurs via Cyclin B Destruction in the Presence of an Active Checkpoint , 2006, Current Biology.

[33]  A. Handyside,et al.  Spindle abnormalities in normally developing and arrested human preimplantation embryos in vitro identified by confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 2005, Human reproduction.

[34]  R. Benezra,et al.  Mitotic checkpoints: from yeast to cancer. , 2001, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[35]  D. Brison Apoptosis in mammalian preimplantation embryos: Regulation by survival factors , 2000, Human fertility.

[36]  M. Raff,et al.  Constitutive expression of the machinery for programmed cell death , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  Y. Kato,et al.  Synchronous division of mouse two-cell embryos with nocodazole in vitro. , 1992, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[38]  Y Moreau,et al.  Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos. , 2013, Human reproduction.

[39]  B. Tarlatzis,et al.  Cytoskeletal analysis of human blastocysts by confocal laser scanning microscopy following vitrification. , 2012, Human reproduction.