Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography

To compare non‐invasive hemodynamic measurements obtained in pregnant and postpartum women using two automated cardiac output monitors against those obtained by two‐dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).

[1]  L. Peeters,et al.  Maternal cardiac adaptation to subsequent pregnancy in formerly pre‐eclamptic women according to recurrence of pre‐eclampsia , 2016, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  H. Mcnamara,et al.  Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. , 2014, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  R. Devereux,et al.  Reference values for echocardiographic assessment of the diameter of the aortic root and ascending aorta spanning all age categories. , 2014, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  B. Thilaganathan,et al.  Cardiovascular Implications in Preeclampsia: An Overview , 2014, Circulation.

[5]  J. Francis,et al.  Observational study of regional aortic size referenced to body size: production of a cardiovascular magnetic resonance nomogram , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[6]  A. Artigas,et al.  Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients. , 2013, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  C. Trepte,et al.  Cardiac index assessment using bioreactance in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery in ovarian carcinoma , 2013, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[8]  P. Peyton,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) , 2012, Anaesthesia.

[9]  G. Sutherland,et al.  Preeclampsia Is Associated With Persistent Postpartum Cardiovascular Impairment , 2011, Hypertension.

[10]  Rob A Phillips,et al.  Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement. , 2009, Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine.

[11]  A. Ho,et al.  A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  O. Thom,et al.  Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  G. Novelli,et al.  Early and Late Preeclampsia: Two Different Maternal Hemodynamic States in the Latent Phase of the Disease , 2008, Hypertension.

[14]  M. Irwin,et al.  Comparison of the USCOM ultrasound cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation , 2008, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[15]  Arik Wolak,et al.  Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  D. Bettex,et al.  Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement , 2008, Intensive Care Medicine.

[17]  Daniel Burkhoff,et al.  Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[18]  P. V. van Heerden,et al.  Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. , 2005, British journal of anaesthesia.

[19]  C. Otto,et al.  Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[20]  L. Critchley,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques , 1999, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[21]  D. Porembka,et al.  Use of a pulmonary artery catheter in the management of the severe preeclamptic patient. , 1990, Anesthesiology review.

[22]  S. Hunter,et al.  Combined Doppler and echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output: theory and application in pregnancy , 1987, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[23]  L Seipel,et al.  Influence of sampling site and flow area on cardiac output measurements by Doppler echocardiography. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  T. Benedetti,et al.  Measurement of Cardiac Output During Pregnancy: Validation of Doppler Technique and Clinical Observations in Preeclampsia , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  M. Quiñones,et al.  Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography: a critical appraisal. , 1986, Herz.

[26]  K. Ueland,et al.  Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. I. Cesarean section under subarachnoid block anesthesia. , 1969, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  K. Ueland,et al.  Maternal cardiovascular dynamics , 1969 .