A deep-learning-based unsupervised model on esophageal manometry using variational autoencoder

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the primary method for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders and its interpretation and classification are based on variables (features) from data of each swallow. Modeling and learning the semantics directly from raw swallow data could not only help automate the feature extraction, but also alleviate the bias from pre-defined features. With more than 32-thousand raw swallow data, a generative model using the approach of variational auto-encoder (VAE) was developed, which, to our knowledge, is the first deep-learning-based unsupervised model on raw esophageal manometry data. The VAE model was reformulated to include different types of loss motivated by domain knowledge and tuned with different hyper-parameters. Training of the VAE model was found sensitive on the learning rate and hence the evidence lower bound objective (ELBO) was further scaled by the data dimension. Case studies showed that the dimensionality of latent space have a big impact on the learned semantics. In particular, cases with 4-dimensional latent variables were found to encode various physiologically meaningful contraction patterns, including strength, propagation pattern as well as sphincter relaxation. Cases with so-called hybrid L2 loss seemed to better capture the coherence of contraction/relaxation transition. Discriminating capability was further evaluated using simple linear discriminative analysis (LDA) on predicting swallow type and swallow pressurization, which yields clustering patterns consistent with clinical impression. The current work on modeling and understanding swallow-level data will guide the development of study-level models for automatic diagnosis as the next stage.

[1]  Zhe Gan,et al.  Variational Autoencoder for Deep Learning of Images, Labels and Captions , 2016, NIPS.

[2]  Kipp W. Johnson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  A. Farmer,et al.  Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Gastroenterology— Promises and Pitfalls , 2018, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[4]  P J Kahrilas,et al.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0 , 2015, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[5]  M. Fox,et al.  Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Esophageal Pressure Topography vs. Conventional Line Tracing , 2015, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[6]  C. Le Berre,et al.  Application of Artificial Intelligence to Gastroenterology and Hepatology. , 2019, Gastroenterology.

[7]  H. Parkman,et al.  Advanced training in neurogastroenterology and gastrointestinal motility. , 2015, Gastroenterology.

[8]  Fei Wang,et al.  Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges , 2018, Briefings Bioinform..

[9]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  A continuum mechanics-based musculo-mechanical model for esophageal transport , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  A. Natali,et al.  A physiological model for the investigation of esophageal motility in healthy and pathologic conditions , 2016, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[11]  Stefano Merigliano,et al.  A Procedure for the Automatic Analysis of High-Resolution Manometry Data to Support the Clinical Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Yuan Yu,et al.  TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning , 2016, OSDI.

[13]  A. Bredenoord,et al.  Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic classification of esophageal motility disorders defined in high-resolution manometry. , 2015, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

[14]  N. Patankar,et al.  Studies of abnormalities of the lower esophageal sphincter during esophageal emptying based on a fully coupled bolus–esophageal–gastric model , 2018, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[15]  E. Savarino,et al.  High-resolution manometry is superior to endoscopy and radiology in assessing and grading sliding hiatal hernia: A comparison with surgical in vivo evaluation , 2018, United European gastroenterology journal.

[16]  D. Carlson Functional lumen imaging probe: The FLIP side of esophageal disease , 2016, Current opinion in gastroenterology.

[17]  Danail Stoyanov,et al.  Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: current evidence and future directions. , 2019, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[18]  Ahmed Hosny,et al.  Artificial intelligence in radiology , 2018, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[19]  B. Ravi Kiran,et al.  An overview of deep learning based methods for unsupervised and semi-supervised anomaly detection in videos , 2018, J. Imaging.

[20]  J. Pandolfino,et al.  Inter‐rater agreement of novel high‐resolution impedance manometry metrics: Bolus flow time and esophageal impedance integral ratio , 2018, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.