Plant survival and keystone pollinator species in stochastic coextinction models: role of intrinsic dependence on animal-pollination

Coextinction models are useful to understand community robustness to species loss and resilience to disturbances. We simulated pollinator extinctions in pollination networks by using a hybrid model that combined a recently developed stochastic coextinction model (SCM) for plant extinctions and a topological model (TCM) for animal extinctions. Our model accounted for variation in interaction strengths and included empirical estimates of plant dependence on pollinators to set seeds. The stochastic nature of such model allowed us determining plant survival to single (and multiple) extinction events, and identifying which pollinators (keystone species) were more likely to trigger secondary extinctions. Consistently across three different pollinator removal sequences, plant robustness was lower than in a pure TCM, and plant survival was more determined by dependence on the mutualism than by interaction strength. As expected, highly connected and dependent plants were the most sensitive to pollinator loss and collapsed faster in extinction cascades. We predict that the relationship between dependence and plant connectivity is crucial to determine network robustness to interaction loss. Finally, we showed that honeybees and several beetles were keystone species in our communities. This information is of great value to foresee consequences of pollinator losses facing current global change and to identify target species for effective conservation.

[1]  J. Ramos,et al.  High Resilience of Seed Dispersal Webs Highlighted by the Experimental Removal of the Dominant Disperser , 2016, Current Biology.

[2]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[3]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Pollination success following loss of a frequent pollinator: the role of compensatory visitation by other effective pollinators , 2017, AoB PLANTS.

[4]  M. Aizen,et al.  Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[5]  Anna Traveset,et al.  Mutualistic Interactions and Biological Invasions , 2014 .

[6]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  Species Coextinctions and the Biodiversity Crisis , 2004, Science.

[7]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[8]  Owen T Lewis,et al.  Structural dynamics and robustness of food webs. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[9]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Complexity and fragility in ecological networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Jason M Tylianakis,et al.  Specialization and Rarity Predict Nonrandom Loss of Interactions from Mutualist Networks , 2012, Science.

[11]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  The robustness of a network of ecological networks to habitat loss. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[12]  J. Dushoff,et al.  Species Abundance, Not Diet Breadth, Drives the Persistence of the Most Linked Pollinators as Plant-Pollinator Networks Disassemble , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Ignasi Bartomeus,et al.  Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  Strong contributors to network persistence are the most vulnerable to extinction , 2011, Nature.

[15]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Combined effects of global change pressures on animal-mediated pollination. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Paulo R. Guimarães,et al.  The Robustness of Plant-Pollinator Assemblages: Linking Plant Interaction Patterns and Sensitivity to Pollinator Loss , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Correlates of extinction proneness in tropical angiosperms , 2008 .

[18]  F. Jordán Keystone species and food webs , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Colin Fontaine,et al.  Stability of Ecological Communities and the Architecture of Mutualistic and Trophic Networks , 2010, Science.

[20]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  The Robustness and Restoration of a Network of Ecological Networks , 2012, Science.

[21]  C. Fenster,et al.  Reproductive Assurance and the Evolution of Pollination Specialization , 2007, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[22]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[23]  F. Perfectti,et al.  Fitness consequences of centrality in mutualistic individual-based networks , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Anna Eklöf,et al.  Species loss and secondary extinctions in simple and complex model communities. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[25]  Mário Almeida-Neto,et al.  A simple stochastic model for complex coextinctions in mutualistic networks: robustness decreases with connectance. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[26]  C. Herrera Components of pollinator "quality": comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage , 1987 .

[27]  C. Tur,et al.  Linking Plant Specialization to Dependence in Interactions for Seed Set in Pollination Networks , 2013, PloS one.

[28]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Floral scents repel facultative flower visitors, but attract obligate ones. , 2010, Annals of botany.

[29]  What if we lose a hub? Experimental testing of pollination network resilience to removal of keystone floral resources , 2016, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

[30]  David W. Inouye,et al.  ENDANGERED MUTUALISMS: The Conservation of Plant-Pollinator Interactions , 1998 .

[31]  Stuart R. Borrett,et al.  Weighting and indirect effects identify keystone species in food webs , 2016, Ecology letters.

[32]  J. Olesen,et al.  Impact of Alien Plant Invaders on Pollination Networks in Two Archipelagos , 2009, PloS one.

[33]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants , 2005 .

[34]  D. Goulson,et al.  Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers , 2015, Science.

[35]  Annie Jonsson,et al.  Food web structure affects the extinction risk of species in ecological communities , 2006 .

[36]  Horacio Ceva,et al.  Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  Ruben H. Heleno,et al.  Invaders of pollination networks in the Galápagos Islands: emergence of novel communities , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Universal resilience patterns in complex networks , 2016, Nature.

[39]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Bumblebee Vulnerability: Common Correlates of Winners and Losers across Three Continents , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[41]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[42]  Juan M Morales,et al.  Invasive Mutualists Erode Native Pollination Webs , 2008, PLoS biology.

[43]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[44]  D. Vázquez,et al.  The strength of plant-pollinator interactions. , 2012, Ecology.

[45]  William J. Bond,et al.  Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction , 1994 .

[46]  H. Sahli,et al.  Characterizing ecological generalization in plant-pollination systems , 2006, Oecologia.

[47]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[48]  C. Herrera,et al.  Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the “quantity” component in a plant-pollinator system , 1989, Oecologia.