Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and maternal‐neonatal morbidity between balloon catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix.

[1]  C. Weiss,et al.  Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review. , 2016, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[2]  A. Agostini,et al.  [Risk of uterine rupture after cervical ripening with ballon catheter on uterus with previous cesarean section]. , 2016, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[3]  K. Ruhstaller.  Induction of labor in the obese patient. , 2015, Seminars in perinatology.

[4]  Yali Hu,et al.  Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, PloS one.

[5]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. , 2015, The Lancet. Global health.

[6]  R. Favre,et al.  Efficacy and safety of labour induction in patients with a single previous Caesarean section: a proposal for a clinical protocol , 2014, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[7]  M. Józwiak,et al.  Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[8]  O. Morel,et al.  [Balloon catheter for cervical ripening on scarred uterus with unfavorable cervix: multicenter retrospective study of 151 patients]. , 2014, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[9]  B. Mol,et al.  Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[10]  J. Dodd,et al.  Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  S. Hakim,et al.  The transcervical foley catheter versus the vaginal prostaglandin e2 gel in the induction of labour in a previous one caesarean section - a clinical study. , 2013, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[12]  E. Clouqueur,et al.  Mode de déclenchement du travail et conduite du travail en cas d’utérus cicatriciel , 2012 .

[13]  James B. Hill,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: comparison of ACOG practice bulletin with other national guidelines. , 2012 .

[14]  F. Ghezzi,et al.  A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  N. Lelong,et al.  Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995 to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. , 2012, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[16]  J. Post,et al.  Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[17]  J.-B. Haumonté,et al.  [Predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section]. , 2012, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[18]  Z. Vaknin,et al.  Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  Yvonne W. Cheng,et al.  Labor Induction With a Foley Balloon Inflated to 30 mL Compared With 60 mL: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  C. Pennell,et al.  Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women With an Unfavorable Cervix: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Double and Single Balloon Catheters and PGE2 Gel , 2010 .

[21]  D. Doherty,et al.  Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  M. Kashanian,et al.  Comparison of 30‐mL and 80‐mL Foley catheter balloons and oxytocin for preinduction cervical ripening , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[23]  A. Kaunitz,et al.  Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  Z. Hagay,et al.  A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  S. Blackwell,et al.  Cervical Ripening With Transcervical Foley Catheter and the Risk of Uterine Rupture , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  Z. Ben-Aroya,et al.  Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-Cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter , 2002, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[27]  Diane P. Martin,et al.  Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  J. Pollard,et al.  Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  E. Lieberman,et al.  Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  Kate C. Arnold,et al.  Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery , 1999 .