Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Ragot | P. Poulain | P. Marés | O. Morel | F. Pierre | M. Sarreau | H. Isly | È. Mousty | Brigitte Fontaine | P. Villemonteix | Alain Godard
[1] C. Weiss,et al. Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review. , 2016, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[2] A. Agostini,et al. [Risk of uterine rupture after cervical ripening with ballon catheter on uterus with previous cesarean section]. , 2016, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.
[3] K. Ruhstaller. Induction of labor in the obese patient. , 2015, Seminars in perinatology.
[4] Yali Hu,et al. Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, PloS one.
[5] Jun Zhang,et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. , 2015, The Lancet. Global health.
[6] R. Favre,et al. Efficacy and safety of labour induction in patients with a single previous Caesarean section: a proposal for a clinical protocol , 2014, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
[7] M. Józwiak,et al. Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.
[8] O. Morel,et al. [Balloon catheter for cervical ripening on scarred uterus with unfavorable cervix: multicenter retrospective study of 151 patients]. , 2014, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.
[9] B. Mol,et al. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[10] J. Dodd,et al. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[11] S. Hakim,et al. The transcervical foley catheter versus the vaginal prostaglandin e2 gel in the induction of labour in a previous one caesarean section - a clinical study. , 2013, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.
[12] E. Clouqueur,et al. Mode de déclenchement du travail et conduite du travail en cas d’utérus cicatriciel , 2012 .
[13] James B. Hill,et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: comparison of ACOG practice bulletin with other national guidelines. , 2012 .
[14] F. Ghezzi,et al. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[15] N. Lelong,et al. Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995 to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. , 2012, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.
[16] J. Post,et al. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2011, The Lancet.
[17] J.-B. Haumonté,et al. [Predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section]. , 2012, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.
[18] Z. Vaknin,et al. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[19] Yvonne W. Cheng,et al. Labor Induction With a Foley Balloon Inflated to 30 mL Compared With 60 mL: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[20] C. Pennell,et al. Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women With an Unfavorable Cervix: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Double and Single Balloon Catheters and PGE2 Gel , 2010 .
[21] D. Doherty,et al. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[22] M. Kashanian,et al. Comparison of 30‐mL and 80‐mL Foley catheter balloons and oxytocin for preinduction cervical ripening , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[23] A. Kaunitz,et al. Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[24] Z. Hagay,et al. A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[25] S. Blackwell,et al. Cervical Ripening With Transcervical Foley Catheter and the Risk of Uterine Rupture , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[26] Z. Ben-Aroya,et al. Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-Cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter , 2002, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[27] Diane P. Martin,et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.
[28] J. Pollard,et al. Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[29] E. Lieberman,et al. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[30] Kate C. Arnold,et al. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery , 1999 .