Variations of the Earth's figure axis from satellite laser ranging and GRACE

[1] Satellite laser ranging (SLR) data were used to determine the variations in the Earth's principal figure axis represented by the degree 2 and order 1 geopotential coefficients: C21 and S21. Significant variations at the annual and Chandler wobble frequencies appear in the SLR time series when the rotational deformation or “pole tides” (i.e., the solid Earth and ocean pole tides) were not modeled. The contribution of the ocean pole tide is estimated to be only ∼8% of the total annual variations in the normalized coefficients: / based on the analysis of SLR data. The amplitude of the nontidal annual variation of is only ∼ 30% of from the SLR time series. The estimates of the annual variation in from SLR, the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and polar motion excitation function, are in a good agreement. The nature of the linear trend for the Earth's figure axis determined by these techniques during the last several years is in general agreement but does not agree as well with results predicted from current glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) models. The “fluid Love number” for the Earth is estimated to be ∼0.9 based on the position of the mean figure axis from the GRACE gravity model GGM03S and the mean pole defined by the IERS 2003 conventions. The estimate of / from GRACE and SLR provides an improved constraint on the relative rotation of the core. The results presented here indicate a possible tilt of the inner core figure axis of ∼2° and ∼3 arc sec displacement for the figure axis of the entire core.

[1]  Byron D. Tapley,et al.  Accelerated Antarctic ice loss from satellite gravity measurements , 2009 .

[2]  Low degree gravity changes from GRACE, Earth rotation, geophysical models, and satellite laser ranging , 2008 .

[3]  J. Wahr,et al.  Measurements of Time-Variable Gravity Show Mass Loss in Antarctica , 2006, Science.

[4]  E. C. Pavlis,et al.  A new gravitational model for the earth from satellite tracking data - GEM-T1 , 1988 .

[5]  Kurt Lambeck,et al.  The Earth's Variable Rotation: Geophysical Causes and Consequences , 1980 .

[6]  M. Greff-Lefftz,et al.  Surface gravitational field and topography changes induced by the Earth’s fluid core motions , 2004 .

[7]  Geoengineering Centres Gfz Publication Database Deutsches GeoFors Earth Observing Satellites,et al.  EIGEN-GL05C - A new global combined high-resolution GRACE-based gravity field model of the GFZ-GRGS cooperation , 2008 .

[8]  Shailen D. Desai,et al.  Observing the pole tide with satellite altimetry , 2002 .

[9]  I. Velicogna.  Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE , 2009 .

[10]  T. Eubanks.  Variations in the Orientation of the Earth , 2013 .

[11]  R. Ray,et al.  Barometric Tides from ECMWF Operational Analyses , 2003 .

[12]  Helmut Moritz,et al.  Earth Rotation: Theory and Observation , 1987 .

[13]  M. Cheng,et al.  GGM02 – An improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE , 2005 .

[14]  M. Cheng,et al.  Long-period perturbations in Starlette orbit and tide solution , 1990 .

[15]  Correction and update to ‘The earth's C21 and S21 gravity coefficients and the rotation of the core’ , 1990 .

[16]  M. Cheng,et al.  Variations in the Earth's oblateness during the past 28 years , 2004 .

[17]  M. Fang,et al.  Surface Deformation Caused by Pressure Changes in the Fluid Core , 1996 .

[18]  O. Francis,et al.  Modelling the global ocean tides: modern insights from FES2004 , 2006 .

[19]  S. Dickman.  Secular trend of the Earth's rotation pole: consideration of motion of the latitude observatories , 1977 .

[20]  G. Petit,et al.  IERS Conventions (2010) , 2010 .

[21]  Dennis D. McCarthy.  IERS Conventions (1996). , 1996 .

[22]  M. Watkins,et al.  The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results , 2004 .

[23]  Gary D. Egbert,et al.  Deviation of Long-Period Tides from Equilibrium: Kinematics and Geostrophy , 2003 .

[24]  W. Munk,et al.  Astronomy-Geophysics. (Book Reviews: The Rotation of the Earth. A geophysical discussion) , 1975 .

[25]  The Earth's C21 and S21 gravity coefficients and the rotation of the core , 1987 .

[26]  U. Meyer,et al.  An Earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S , 2005 .

[27]  J. Bloxham,et al.  Inner core tilt and polar motion , 2002 .

[28]  C. Reigber.  Representation of orbital element variations and force function with respect to various reference systems , 1981 .

[29]  E. W. Schwiderski,et al.  Atlas of ocean tidal charts and maps, Part I: The semidiurnal principal lunar tide M2 , 1983 .

[30]  John M. Wahr,et al.  Deformation induced by polar motion , 1985 .

[31]  Bob E Schutz,et al.  Lageos Laser Ranging Contributions to Geodynamics, Geodesy, and Orbital Dynamics , 2013 .

[32]  Isabella Velicogna,et al.  Greenland mass balance from GRACE , 2005 .

[33]  Thomas A. Herring,et al.  Forced nutations of the Earth: Influence of inner core dynamics: 1. Theory , 1991 .

[34]  F. Barthelmes,et al.  Relative wobble of the Earth's inner core derived from polar motion and associated gravity variations , 2001 .

[35]  Gerard Petit,et al.  IERS Conventions (2003) , 2004 .